IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The importance of obtaining a more balanced relationship between the long and short food chain in the worldwide market for farm and food produce. A contribution to the debate on the capabilities of the short chain

Listed author(s):
  • Sini, Maria Paola
Registered author(s):

    This paper is intended as an approach to the complex matter of the co-existence of long and short chains. It introduces a stimulus to further study these questions more thoroughly, which current market situations lead us to believe will be an interesting field, and one well worthy of consideration. The potentials and limits of short chain efficiency are analyzed in different contexts, in order to help identify its correct collocation in the search for the best combination of the different ways by which products can be released on the markets, with specific reference to the coexistence of the short and long chain. On this regard, a brief examination is also made of the effects of growing wholesaler power and the possibilities of a relevant control. Amongst other aspects, the paper highlights the fact that the relationship between short and long chain need not always be one of conflict, and refers particularly to the scope of agricultural-industrial districts. Context analysis, and specifically SWOT analysis, has been used to debate two different contexts. Many different situations have been examined and summarized, and amassed into two large context groups: developed and underdeveloped countries. The connections between short chain, self-centred development and protectionism are considered. The need is highlighted, and difficulty evaluated, of construction suitable models simulating alternative agricultural-food market function both on a local and global scale, also with reference to region and international trade growth models based on heterodox rather than orthodox development theories. This involves the need to identify emblematic indicators that are able to provide a summary expression of data and information to be included in these models in order to active them. As such, as set of indicators of the short chain juxtaposed to the long chain, suitable to assessing the social and economic, as well as environmental impacts, is proposed, and its validity discussed. The results of the analyses performed contribute towards evaluating and choosing the most appropriate options for the release of the product, for the different types of agricultural companies in different settings.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by European Association of Agricultural Economists in its series 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy with number 95342.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 27 Oct 2010
    Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa116:95342
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. De Benedictis, Michele & De Filippis, Fabrizio & Salvatici, Luca, 1991. "Between Scylla and Charibdys: Agricultural Economists' Navigation around Protectionism and Free Trade," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 18(3-4), pages 311-337.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa116:95342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.