IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/123087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Product Procurement: A Summary of Buying Practices and Acceptance Criteria at U.S. Supermarket Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Fredericks, Peter J.
  • McLaughlin, Edward W.

Abstract

The introduction of new products to U.s. supermarkets is a business function with significant implications for all food system participants -from manufactures and supermarket retailers to consumers. In 1991 over 16,000 new items were introduced into the U.s. grocery distribution system, more than a 1,000 percent increase from the average number of annual introductions during the 1970s. Despite the magnitude of product introductions, and given the central role supermarket buyers play in the ultimate success or failure of manufacturers' new products, the new product procurement process of U.s. supermarket chains has comparatively been little researched. The intent of this study was to examine the new product review process of U.s. supermarket chains and thereby gain an improved understanding of supermarket procurement procedures. Additionally, this study reviews some of the factors behind the growing number ofnew product introductions and discusses the impacts and costs of the proliferation of grocery products on food system participants. Data for the study came from a nationwide survey of the top 200 U.s. supermarket chains. Responses from more than 100 different chains provided information on the typical buying structures utilized by food retailers, the role supermarket buyers play in the introduction and acceptance/rejection of new products, and important attributes buyers look for when evaluating new products.More than 60 percent of all newly introduced products are turned down by supermarket chains and never make it onto store shelves. Of all products accepted by supermarkets, approximately one-half have been removed from retailers shelves within a year due in part to poor sales levels. The development and introduction of new products when combined with the substantial number of product failures consumes considerable resources among all participants in the grocery product distribution system. There are however, steps manufacturers can take to increase the probability of their new product being successful. These include developing and offering products that are fundamentally new, or that are in strong growth categories, to working more closely with their retail accounts and forging true "partnership" relationships. In today's competitive food industry it is imperative for manufacturers and retailers to understand each other's actions and expectations regarding the introduction of new products for the long term success and profitability of all parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredericks, Peter J. & McLaughlin, Edward W., 1992. "New Product Procurement: A Summary of Buying Practices and Acceptance Criteria at U.S. Supermarket Chains," Research Bulletins 123087, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:123087
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.123087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123087/files/Cornell_Dyson_rb9212.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.123087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward W. McLaughlin & Vithala R. Rao, 1990. "The Strategic Role of Supermarket Buyer Intermediaries in New Product Selection: Implications for Systemwide Efficiency," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(2), pages 358-370.
    2. Robert C. Blattberg & Alan Levin, 1987. "Modelling the Effectiveness and Profitability of Trade Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 124-146.
    3. Richard Schmalensee, 1978. "Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 305-327, Autumn.
    4. Rao, Vithala R. & McLaughlin, Edward W., 1988. "Modeling the Decision to Add New Products by Channel Intermediaries," Working Papers 178699, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. John M. Connor, 1981. "Food Product Proliferation: A Market Structure Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 607-617.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Perosio, Debra J., 1996. "The Role of the Supermarket Buyer," Research Bulletins 122826, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Stoneman, Paul, 2011. "Soft Innovation: Economics, Product Aesthetics, and the Creative Industries," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199697021.
    3. Groff, Andrew J. & Christy, Ralph D., 1996. "New Food Products: Innovation, Improvement, Or Imitation?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 1-7, February.
    4. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Perosio, Debra J., 1994. "Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Procurement Dynamics: The Role of the Supermarket Buyer," Research Bulletins 123000, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McLaughlin, Edward W. & Rao, Vithala R., 1988. "The Strategic Role of Supermarket Buyer Intermediaries in New Product Selection: Implications for Systemwide Efficiency," Working Papers 115905, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    2. Daniel Levy & Andrew T. Young, 2021. "Promise, trust, and betrayal: Costs of breaching an implicit contract," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(3), pages 1031-1051, January.
    3. Grunewald, Orlen & Faulds, David J., 1990. "Product Quality And Value For Processed Foods," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270913, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Barry L. Bayus & William P. Putsis, Jr., 1999. "Product Proliferation: An Empirical Analysis of Product Line Determinants and Market Outcomes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 137-153.
    5. Sarangi, Subrat & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Triantis, Konstantinos P., 2021. "Multimarket competition effects on product line decisions – A multi-objective decision model in fast moving consumer goods industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 388-398.
    6. Haimanti Bhattacharya & Robert Innes, 2016. "Concentration, Product Variety, and Entry-for-Merger: Evidence from New Product Introductions in the U.S. Food Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1360-1376.
    7. Yanhui Zhao & Yufei Zhang & Joyce (Feng) Wang & Wyatt A. Schrock & Roger J. Calantone, 2020. "Brand relevance and the effects of product proliferation across product categories," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1192-1210, November.
    8. Cotterill, Ronald, 1998. "Jawboning Cereal: The Campaign to Lower Cereal Prices," Issue Papers 161559, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    9. Martinez, Stephen W., 2013. "Introduction of New Food Products With Voluntary Health- and Nutrition-Related Claims, 1989-2010," Economic Information Bulletin 145319, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Herrmann, Roland & Schröck, Rebecca, 2011. "Determinanten des Innovationserfolgs: eine Analyse mit Scannerdaten für den deutschen Joghurtmarkt," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(03), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Putsis, William Jr. & Dhar, Ravi, 2001. "An empirical analysis of the determinants of category expenditure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 277-291, June.
    12. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Sridhar, Shrihari & Naik, Prasad A. & Kelkar, Ajay, 2017. "Metrics unreliability and marketing overspending," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 761-779.
    14. Montgomery, D. & Swinnen, G. & Vanhoof, K., 1997. "Comparison of some AI and statistical classification methods for a marketing case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 312-325, December.
    15. Dirk Crass & Franz Schwiebacher, 2017. "The importance of trademark protection for product differentiation and innovation," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(2), pages 199-220, June.
    16. Claudio Giachetti & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2014. "Detecting the relationship between competitive intensity and firm product line length: Evidence from the worldwide mobile phone industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9), pages 1398-1409, September.
    17. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    18. Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2000. "Market Entry Strategy Under Firm Heterogeneity and Asymmetric Payoffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 313-327, November.
    19. Nevo, Aviv, 2001. "Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 307-342, March.
    20. Vidyanand Choudhary & Mingdi Xin & Zhe Zhang, 2023. "Sequential IT Investment: Can the Risk of IT Implementation Failure Be Your Friend?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1017-1044, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:123087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.