IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea13/150752.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating Spatial Dimension into Jointly Dynamic Groundwater Extraction

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hongliang
  • Antle, John M.

Abstract

One of the most important groundwater problems in Oregon, Washington and Idaho is the long-term decline of the groundwater surface level, which has been intensified by wells through discharging water from aquifers. Groundwater contamination from agriculture aggravates the depletion problem in irrigated regions since quality has a decisive role in ways of water use. We developed a spatial agricultural groundwater extraction model by coupling a hydrological model and a contamination migration model. We find that the optimal groundwater extraction is reduced if spatial interactions are incorporated, and that spatial heterogeneities such as crop varieties and soil types affect individual extraction. The socially optimal paths of shadow prices of groundwater quantity and quality depend on time preference, stock effect and dilution effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hongliang & Antle, John M., 2013. "Integrating Spatial Dimension into Jointly Dynamic Groundwater Extraction," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150752, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:150752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/150752
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brozovic, Nicholas & Sunding, David L. & Zilberman, David, 2010. "On the spatial nature of the groundwater pumping externality," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 154-164, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Groundwater; Dynamic; Spatial; Groundwater quantity; Groundwater Quality; Agricultural Water Use; Crop Production/Industries; Environmental Economics and Policy; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:150752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.