IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea05/19243.html

Why Nicaraguan Peasants Remain in Agricultural Production Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Lerman, Zvi
  • Ruben, Ruerd

Abstract

Many Nicaraguan peasants remain members in agricultural production cooperatives despite the change in the policy environment that now supports parcellation of cooperative lands into individual holdings. Institutional factors, such as uncertainty of land ownership rights and difficulties with resolution of cooperative debt, are found to play a dominant role in keeping Nicaraguan peasants in cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Lerman, Zvi & Ruben, Ruerd, 2005. "Why Nicaraguan Peasants Remain in Agricultural Production Cooperatives," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19243, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19243
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19243/files/sp05le01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lerman, Zvi & Csaki, Csaba & Feder, Gershon, 2002. "Land policies and evolving farm structures in transition countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2794, The World Bank.
    2. Carter, Michael R, 1987. "Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Decollectivization of Agriculture," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 577-595, September.
    3. Barham, Bradford L & Childress, Malcolm, 1992. "Membership Desertion as an Adjustment Process on Honduran Agrarian Reform Enterprises," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(3), pages 587-613, April.
    4. Putterman, Louis, 1981. "On optimality in collective institutional choice," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 392-403, December.
    5. Wilson, Paul N & Thompson, Gary D, 1993. "Common Property and Uncertainty: Compensating Coalitions by Mexico's Patoral Ejidatarios," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 299-318, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mujawamariya, Gaudiose & D’Haese, Marijke & Speelman, Stijn, 2013. "Exploring double side-selling in cooperatives, case study of four coffee cooperatives in Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 72-83.
    2. Aniseh S. Bro & Daniel C. Clay & David L. Ortega & Maria C. Lopez, 2019. "Determinants of adoption of sustainable production practices among smallholder coffee producers in Nicaragua," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 895-915, April.
    3. Bina Agarwal, 2019. "The interplay of ideas, institutional innovations and organisational structures: Insights from group farming in India," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-116-19, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Seung C. Ahn & Josef C. Brada & Jos� A. M�ndez, 2012. "Effort, Technology and the Efficiency of Agricultural Cooperatives," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1601-1616, November.
    5. Bina Agarwal & Bruno Dorin, 2017. "Group farming in France. Why are some regions more conducive to cooperation than others?," Working Papers hal-01684032, HAL.
    6. Bina Agarwal & Bruno Dorin, 2019. "Group farming in France: Why do some regions have more cooperative ventures than others?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 781-804, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Espinoza, Mauricio & Escobal, Javier, 2025. "The impact of Peru’s land reform on national agricultural productivity: A synthetic control study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Rizov, Marian & Gavrilescu, Dinu & Gow, Hamish & Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F. M., 2001. "Transition and Enterprise Restructuring: The Development of Individual Farming in Romania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(7), pages 1257-1274, July.
    3. Chen, Jing & Rozelle, Scott, 2003. "Market Emergence And The Rise And Fall Of Backyard Hog Production In China," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21969, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Radeloff, Volker C. & Muller, Daniel & Dubinin, Maxim & Baumann, Matthias, 2011. "Determinants Of Agricultural Land Abandonment In Post-Soviet European Russia," 2011 IAMO Forum, June 23-24, 2011, Halle (Saale), Germany 115363, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2007. "Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation : productivity and equity impacts in China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4454, The World Bank.
    6. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2011. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content in Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE - Vantaggi comparati, costi di transazione e contenuto dei fattori nel commercio agr," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 64(1), pages 67-101.
    7. Visser, Oane, 2007. "Virtues of Being Large? Farm Restructuring, Labour Arrangements and network strategies of Russian Large Farms Enterprises in Rostov and Pskov," 102nd Seminar, May 17-18, 2007, Moscow, Russia 10012, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Mathijs, Erik & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 1997. "Agricultural Decollectivization in Central and Eastern Europe," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197062, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Malcolm Dunn, 2000. "Privatization, Land Reform, and Property Rights: the Mexican Experience," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 215-230, September.
    10. Josef C. Brada & Jose A. Mendez, 2009. "Technology, Effort and the Efficiency of Production: Labor-managed versus Capitalist Firms," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 7(1), pages 35-53.
    11. Georgiev, Nenad & Gjosevski, Dragon & Simonovska, Ana & Nacka, Marina, 2015. "Opportunities to profit under competitive market conditions: The case of the Macedonian wineries," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211650, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Savov, Radovan & Lančarič, Drahoslav & Kozáková, Jana & Némethová, Veronika, 2017. "Human resources in Slovak agriculture: impact of selected factors," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 14, pages 1-12.
    13. Guirkinger, Catherine & Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2015. "Transformation of the family farm under rising land pressure: A theoretical essay," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 112-137.
    14. Goetghebuer, Tatiana, 2011. "Productive inefficiency in patriarchal family farms: evidence from Mali," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 34, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    15. Bojnec, Stefan, 2011. "Land Markets in the Three Candidate Countries of the EU," Working papers 117482, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    16. Herzfeld, Thomas & Akhmadiyeva, Zarema, 2021. "Agricultural labour in transition: An update," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 144-160.
    17. Jarmila Lazíková & Ľubica Rumanovská & Ivan Takáč & Piotr Prus & Alexander Fehér, 2021. "Regional Differences of Agricultural Land Market in Slovakia: A Challenge for Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Varga, Mihai, 2022. "Getting the “basics”? The World Bank’s narrative construction of poverty reduction in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    19. repec:lic:licosd:16906 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Cimpoies, Dragos & Lerman, Zvi, 2007. "Land Policy And Farm Efficiency: The Lessons Of Moldova," 104th Seminar, September 5-8, 2007, Budapest, Hungary 7839, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Guirkinger, Catherine & Platteau, Jean-Philippe & Goetghebuer, Tatiana, 2015. "Productive inefficiency in extended agricultural households: Evidence from Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 17-27.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.