IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Identifying Asset Poverty Thresholds – New methods with an application to Pakistan and Ethiopia

  • Naschold, Felix
Registered author(s):

    Understanding how households escape poverty depends on understanding how they accumulate assets over time. Therefore, identifying the degree of linearity in household asset dynamics, and specifically any potential asset poverty thresholds, is of fundamental interest to the design of poverty reduction policies. If household asset holdings converged unconditionally to a single long run equilibrium, then all poor could be expected to escape poverty over time. In contrast, if there are critical asset thresholds that trap households below the poverty line, then households would need specific assistance to escape poverty. Similarly, the presence of asset poverty thresholds would mean that short term asset shocks could lead to long term destitution, thus highlighting the need for social safety nets. In addition to the direct policy relevance, identifying household asset dynamics and potential asset thresholds presents an interesting methodological challenge to researchers. Potential asset poverty thresholds can only be identified in a framework that allows multiple dynamic equilibria. Any unstable equilibrium points would indicate a potential poverty threshold, above which households are expected to accumulate further and below which households are on a trajectory that makes them poorer over time. The key empirical issue addressed in the paper is whether such threshold points exist in Pakistan and Ethiopia and, if so, where they are located. Methodologically, the paper explores what econometric technique is best suited for this type of analysis. The paper contributes to the small current literature on modeling nonlinear household welfare dynamics in three ways. First, it compares previously used techniques for identifying asset poverty traps by applying them to the same dataset, and examines whether, and how, the choice of estimation technique affects the result. Second, it explores whether other estimation techniques may be more suitable to locate poverty thresholds. Third, it adds the first study for a South Asian country and makes a comparison with Ethiopia. Household assets are combined into a single asset index using two techniques: factor analysis and regression. These indices are used to estimate asset dynamics and locate dynamic asset equilibria, first by nonparametric methods including LOWESS, kernel weighted local regression and spline smoothers, and then by global polynomial parametric techniques. To combine the advantages of nonparametric and parametric techniques - a flexible functional form and the ability to control for covariates, respectively - the paper adapts a mixed model representation of a penalized spline to estimate asset dynamics through a semiparametric partially linear model. This paper identifies a single dynamic asset equilibrium with a slightly concave dynamic asset accumulation path in each country. There is no evidence for multiple dynamic equilibria. This result is robust across econometric methods and across different ways of constructing the asset index. The concave accumulation path means that poorer households recover more slowly from asset shocks. Concavity also implies that greater initial equality of assets would lead to higher growth. Moreover, the dynamic asset equilibria are very low. In Pakistan it is below the average asset holdings of the poor households in the sample. In Ethiopia, the equilibrium is barely above the very low mean. This, together with the slow speed of asset accumulation for the poorest households, suggests that convergence towards the long run equilibrium may be slow and insufficient for rural households in Pakistan and Ethiopia to escape poverty.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) in its series 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI with number 19115.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19115
    Contact details of provider: Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
    Phone: (414) 918-3190
    Fax: (414) 276-3349
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Aghion, Philippe & Caroli, Eve & Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia, 1999. "Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of the new growth theories," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9908, CEPREMAP.
    2. Patrick M. Emerson & Andre Portela Souza, 2002. "Is There a Child Labor Trap? Inter-Generational Persistence of Child Labor in Brazil," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0214, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    3. Basu, Kaushik, 1998. "Child labor : cause, consequence, and cure, with remarks on International Labor Standards," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2027, The World Bank.
    4. Christopher B. Barrett, 2005. "Rural poverty dynamics: development policy implications," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 45-60, 01.
    5. Jalan, Jyotsna & Ravallion, Martin, 2001. "Household income dynamics in rural China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2706, The World Bank.
    6. Pagan,Adrian & Ullah,Aman, 1999. "Nonparametric Econometrics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521586115, October.
    7. Sahn, David E. & Stifel, David C., 2000. "Poverty Comparisons Over Time and Across Countries in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 2123-2155, December.
    8. Oded Galor & Joseph Zeira, 2013. "Income Distribution and Macroeconomics," Working Papers 2013-12, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    9. Lybbert, Travis J. & Barrett, Christopher B. & Desta, Solomon & Coppock, D. Layne, 2002. "Stochastic Wealth Dynamics And Risk Management Among A Poor Population," Working Papers 14736, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Andrew F. Newman, 1990. "Occupational Choice and the Process of Development," Discussion Papers 911, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    11. Michael Carter & Christopher Barrett, 2006. "The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 178-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea05:19115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.