IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/364814.html

Stakeholders’ Use and Awareness of the Benefits of Wetland Management Practices in Ewaso Narok Swamp in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Mwangi, Magdalene Mutumi
  • Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo
  • Otieno, David Jakinda

Abstract

A wetland is a distinct ecosystem that is occupied by water either permanently or seasonally and in which plants or animals have been adapted. Wetlands are important for their richness in biodiversity and livelihood support functions. Wise use of wetlands is advocated in the Ramsar Convention which encompasses the implementation of conservation approaches to maintain the ecological character of such lands. According to this, the factors that are responsible for degradation, like the indiscriminate use of fertilizers should be controlled. Wetland management practices (WMPs) are essential and safe substitutes for fertilizers because they promote resource conservation and increase farm yields. Awareness of the benefits of the WMPs is expected to enhance their utilization and reduce the use of fertilizers and chemicals which affect wetland and human health. In order to ascertain the felt needs in Ewaso Narok Swamp, participatory baseline surveys were carried out among two major stakeholder groups; Water Resource Users Association (WRUA) and Water Resource Authority (WRA). It showed low uptake of WMPs and high use of fertilizer and other chemicals. Subsequently, a study was carried out to determine if benefit awareness influenced the use of WMPs. Results showed that an increase of benefit awareness is likely to increase the use of soil and water conservation practices by 27 percent and decrease the likelihood of not using any wetland management practice by 44 percent. Group membership has to be encouraged while fertilizer use should be discouraged in order to promote sustainable wetland management.

Suggested Citation

  • Mwangi, Magdalene Mutumi & Nyikal, Rose Adhiambo & Otieno, David Jakinda, 2023. "Stakeholders’ Use and Awareness of the Benefits of Wetland Management Practices in Ewaso Narok Swamp in Kenya," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364814, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364814
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364814/files/138.%20Wetlands%20in%20Kenya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayele, Getaneh K & Gessess, Azalu A & Addisie, Meseret B & Tilshun, Seifu A & Tenessa, Daregot B & Langendoen, Eddy J & Steenhuis, Tammo S & Nicholson, Charles F, 2015. "The economic cost of upland and gully erosion on subsistence agriculture for a watershed in the Ethiopian highlands," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14.
    2. Jackson Bunyangha & Agnes. W. N. Muthumbi & Anthony Egeru & Robert Asiimwe & Dunston W. Ulwodi & Nathan. N. Gichuki & Mwanjalolo. J. G. Majaliwa, 2022. "Preferred Attributes for Sustainable Wetland Management in Mpologoma Catchment, Uganda: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Xinyun Gu & Shimei Weng & Yu’e Li & Xiaoqi Zhou, 2022. "Effects of Water and Fertilizer Management Practices on Methane Emissions from Paddy Soils: Synthesis and Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Parita Shah & George Atisa, 2021. "Environmental education and awareness: the present and future key to the sustainable management of Ramsar convention sites in Kenya," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 611-630, December.
    5. Cragg, John G, 1971. "Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(5), pages 829-844, September.
    6. Mwangi, Magdalene Mutumi & Ritho, Cecilia Nyawira & Willy, Daniel Kyalo & Guthiga, Paul Maina, "undated". "Factors Influencing Resource Use Behavior In Ewaso Narok Wetland, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269531, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Mensah-Bonsu, Akwasi & Sarpong, Daniel Bruce & Al-Hassan, Ramatu & Asuming-Brempong, Samuel & Egyir, Irene S. & Kuwornu, John K. M. & Osei-Asare, Yaw B., . "Intensity of and factors affecting land and water management practices among smallholder maize farmers in Ghana," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(02).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yungtai Lo, 2017. "Joint modeling of bottle use, daily milk intake from bottles, and daily energy intake in toddlers," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2301-2316, October.
    2. Love, James H. & Ganotakis, Panagiotis, 2013. "Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-17.
    3. Chetty, Rinelle & Hofmeyr, Andre & Kincaid, Harold & Monroe, Brian, 2021. "The Trust Game Does Not (Only) Measure Trust: The Risk-Trust Confound Revisited," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Gebremedhin, Berhanu & Swinton, Scott M., 1999. "Reconciling Food-For-Work Objectives: Resource Conservation Vs. Food Aid Targeting In Tigray, Ethiopia," Staff Paper Series 11708, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Sandipta Debanshi & Swades Pal, 2020. "Assessing gully erosion susceptibility in Mayurakshi river basin of eastern India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 883-914, February.
    6. Bucchianeri Grace Wong, 2010. "Is SARS a Poor Man's Disease? Socioeconomic Status and Risk Factors for SARS Transmission," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, July.
    7. Kani, Masayo & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2012. "Understanding the technology market for patents: New insights from a licensing survey of Japanese firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 226-235.
    8. Levison S. Chiwaula & Gowokani Chijere Chirwa & Lucy S. Binauli & James Banda & Joseph Nagoli, 2018. "Gender differences in willingness to pay for capital-intensive agricultural technologies: the case of fish solar tent dryers in Malawi," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Castro N. Gichuki & Jiqin Han & Tim Njagi, 2020. "The Impact of Household Wealth on Adoption and Compliance to GLOBAL GAP Production Standards: Evidence from Smallholder farmers in Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Matteo M. Galizzi & Krystal W. Lau & Marisa Miraldo & Katharina Hauck, 2022. "Bandwagoning, free‐riding and heterogeneity in influenza vaccine decisions: An online experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 614-646, April.
    11. Monica Roman, 2013. "Financial Effects of the International Migration in Europe: Modelling the Decision to Remit," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 60(4), pages 541-555, June.
    12. Aron TOROK & Jozsef TOTH & Jeremias Mate BALOGH, 2018. "Networking theory of innovation in practice - The Hungarian case," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(12), pages 536-545.
    13. Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto & Morales, Marina, 2018. "The effect of culture on the fertility decisions of immigrant women in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 15-28.
    14. Fanghella, Valeria & Ibanez, Lisette & Thøgersen, John, 2025. "What you don't know, can't hurt you: Avoiding donation requests for environmental causes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Bhagyashree Katare & Hyejin Yim & Anne Byrne & H. Holly Wang & Michael Wetzstein, 2023. "Consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable meat and a plant‐based meat substitute," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 145-163, March.
    16. Abate, Gashaw T. & Bachewe, Fantu N. & Regassa, Mekdim D., 2021. "Rural Income Diversification in Ethiopia: Patterns, Trends, and Welfare Impacts," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315315, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Niclas Hagelin & Bengt Pramborg, 2004. "Empirical evidence on the incentives to hedge transaction and translation exposure," Finance 0407020, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Rudolf, Katrin & Romero, Miriam & Asnawi, Rosyani & Irawan, Bambang & Wollni, Meike, 2020. "Effects of information and seedling provision on tree planting and survival in smallholder oil palm plantations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    20. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.