IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/unaaed/269531.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Factors Influencing Resource Use Behavior In Ewaso Narok Wetland, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Mwangi, Magdalene Mutumi
  • Ritho, Cecilia Nyawira
  • Willy, Daniel Kyalo
  • Guthiga, Paul Maina

Abstract

Wetlands are areas permanently or seasonally flooded by water where plants and animals have become adapted over time. They provide critical ecosystem services and contribute to the national economy both directly and indirectly. The Ewaso Narok Wetland is an important ecosystem providing water, farming land and pasture for the livestock. Despite its importance, the wetland is threatened by human activities such as over-cultivation and overgrazing. Therefore, there is a need for sustainable management of the wetland in order to increase its contribution to livelihoods of the current and future generations. The objective of this study was to characterize the major wetland users, to assess the determinants of the individual rate of time preference and resource use behavior among the users. Stratified simple random sampling technique was used to select 99 pastoralists, 95 commercial and 106 small scale farmers in Ewaso Narok Wetland, Kenya. A questionnaire was used to collect household level data. Descriptive statistics, cross tabulations, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD test were used to characterize the wetland users. Hyperbolic model was used in after the choice and matching tasks in calculating the individual rate of time preference while land use intensity index was used as a proxy for the resource use behaviour. Seemingly unrelated regression estimator (SURE) model was used to identify the factors influencing the individual rate of time preference and resource use behavior of the wetland users. Results show that the individual rate of time preference was influenced positively by the size of land area under crop, conflicts among the users, being a commercial farmer and the distance of a homestead to piped water. The resource use behavior was influenced positively by the individual rate of time preference, household size, the number of years of using the wetland and tropical livestock units and negatively by membership to credit lending groups, the level of education, and security of land tenure. The study concludes that the individual rate of time preference was the major contributor of the high intensity of land use and hence its determinants should be considered in sustainable management of the Ewaso Narok Wetland. Consequently, the study recommends that there should be a provision of title deeds to users in areas outside the wetland area to facilitate sustainable wetland use. Diversification into alternative income generating activities should be encouraged through groups and encourage infrastructural development like installation of piped water as an alternative source of resource to minimize dependency on the wetland.

Suggested Citation

  • Mwangi, Magdalene Mutumi & Ritho, Cecilia Nyawira & Willy, Daniel Kyalo & Guthiga, Paul Maina, 2017. "Factors Influencing Resource Use Behavior In Ewaso Narok Wetland, Kenya," Dissertations and Theses 269531, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269531
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.269531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269531/files/Magdalene%20%20Thesis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/269531/files/Magdalene%20%20Thesis.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.269531?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. Kip Viscusi & Joel Huber, 2006. "Hyperbolic Discounting of Public Goods," NBER Working Papers 11935, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Maarten Voors & Eleonora Nillesen & Philip Verwimp & Erwin Bulte & Robert Lensink & Daan van Soest, 2010. "Does Conflict affect Preferences? Results from Field Experiments in Burundi," HiCN Working Papers 71, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Teh, Louise S.L. & Teh, Lydia C.L. & Rashid Sumaila, U., 2014. "Time preference of small-scale fishers in open access and traditionally managed reef fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 222-231.
    4. Taruvinga, Amon & Mushunje, Abbyssinia, 2010. "Socio-economic Factors that Influence Households: Participation in Wetland Cultivation: A Binary Logistic Regression of Wetland Cultivators and Noncultivators," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95967, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    5. Paul A. Samuelson, 1937. "A Note on Measurement of Utility," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 155-161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bård Harstad, 2013. "Investment Policy for Time-Inconsistent Discounters," CESifo Working Paper Series 4546, CESifo.
    2. Drouhin, Nicolas, 2015. "A rank-dependent utility model of uncertain lifetime," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 208-224.
    3. Mononen, Lasse, 2024. "Dynamically Consistent Intergenerational Welfare," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 687, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. Min Gong & David Krantz & Elke Weber, 2014. "Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 103-124, October.
    5. Lovric, M. & Kaymak, U. & Spronk, J., 2008. "A Conceptual Model of Investor Behavior," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-030-F&A, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    6. Lex Borghans & Angela Lee Duckworth & James J. Heckman & Bas ter Weel, 2008. "The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 43(4).
    7. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2020. "Recursive objective and subjective multiple priors," Post-Print halshs-02900497, HAL.
    8. David Macro & Jeroen Weesie, 2016. "Inequalities between Others Do Matter: Evidence from Multiplayer Dictator Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    9. repec:voc:wpaper:tech82012 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Jihyo Kim & Suhyeon Nam, 2021. "Do Household Time, Risk, and Social Preferences Affect Home Energy Retrofit Decisions in Korea?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Sylvain Béal & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "Discounted Tree Solutions," Working Papers hal-01377923, HAL.
    12. Ida, Takanori & Goto, Rei & Takahashi, Yuko & Nishimura, Shuzo, 2011. "Can economic-psychological parameters predict successful smoking cessation?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 285-295, May.
    13. Steinhorst, M.P. & Bahrs, E., 2013. "Renditansprüche im Kontext gleichmäßiger Rückflüsse – Ergebnisse eines Experiments mit Stakeholdern des Agribusiness," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    14. Schilirò, Daniele & Graziano, Mario, 2011. "Scelte e razionalità nei modelli economici: un'analisi multidisciplinare [Choices and rationality in economic models: a multidisciplinary analysis]," MPRA Paper 31910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Jindrich Matousek & Tomas Havranek & Zuzana Irsova, 2022. "Individual discount rates: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 318-358, February.
    16. Hansen, Anders Chr., 2006. "Do declining discount rates lead to time inconsistent economic advice?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 138-144, November.
    17. Meyer, Andrew G., 2015. "The impacts of elicitation mechanism and reward size on estimated rates of time preference," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 132-148.
    18. Luigi Mittone & Lucia Savadori, 2008. "Influence of time delay on choice between gambles: Savoring the emotion," CEEL Working Papers 0802, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    19. Giles W Story & Ivaylo Vlaev & Ben Seymour & Joel S Winston & Ara Darzi & Raymond J Dolan, 2013. "Dread and the Disvalue of Future Pain," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Philip Streich & Jack S. Levy, 2007. "Time Horizons, Discounting, and Intertemporal Choice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(2), pages 199-226, April.
    21. Gabriel Leite Mota, 2022. "Unsatisfying ordinalism: The breach through which happiness (re)entered economics," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 513-528, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:unaaed:269531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://agrieconomics.uonbi.ac.ke/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.