IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afd/wpaper/2501.html

Do Judges Contribute to Gender Inequalities Following Divorce? An Empirical Analysis of the Determination of Alimony by French Judges

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Bourreau-Dubois

    (Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA) UMR 7522, CNRS, University of Lorraine)

  • Myriam Doriat-Duban

    (Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA) UMR 7522, CNRS, University of Lorraine)

  • Agnès Gramain

    (Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA) UMR 7522, CNRS, University of Lorraine)

  • Bruno Jeandidier

    (Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA) UMR 7522, CNRS, University of Lorraine)

  • Jean-Claude Ray

    (Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA) UMR 7522, CNRS, University of Lorraine)

Abstract

Drawing upon an exhaustive dataset of French court decisions involving a claim for alimony, this paper presents new findings on the determinants of the level of alimony set by judges in divorce cases. In particular, we show that the amount of alimony can be explained as the result of a twofold logic of compromise. The first is a compromise between the amount of alimony that peers would have set in this specific case and the proposal of the ex-spouses. The second is a compromise between the debtor’s proposal and the creditor’s proposal, with greater weight given to the debtor’s proposal. In this way, our results shed light on the mechanisms by which judges’ decisions have little effect on reducing postdivorce economic gender inequalities, even though the main function of alimony is to reduce the differences in couples’ living standards after divorce. This weak corrective effect can be explained by the overemphasis on the proposal of the debtor and by the fact that judges incorporate the peer norm, which is itself dragged down by the proposals of the debtors.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Bourreau-Dubois & Myriam Doriat-Duban & Agnès Gramain & Bruno Jeandidier & Jean-Claude Ray, 2025. "Do Judges Contribute to Gender Inequalities Following Divorce? An Empirical Analysis of the Determination of Alimony by French Judges," Working Papers AFED 25-01, Association Francaise d'Economie du Droit (AFED).
    • Handle: RePEc:afd:wpaper:2501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://afed.ovh/RePEc/afd/wpaper/AFED-WP-25-01.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorian Kessler, 2020. "Economic Gender Equality and the Decline of Alimony in Switzerland," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 493-518, September.
    2. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mason, Susan G. & Holley, Don & Wells, Aaron & Jain, Amit & Wuerzer, Thomas & Joshi, Alark, 2016. "An experiment-based methodology to understand the dynamics of group decision making," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 14-26.
    2. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    3. Isabel Melguizo & Sergio Tovar, 2026. "Effort Provision in Peer Groups," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 28(1), February.
    4. Mao, Zhaofang & Yuan, Ruiying & Wang, Jianan, 2024. "Precision marketing for newly-launched products: How to offer free trials to consumers?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Christine Bertram & Heini Ahtiainen & Jürgen Meyerhoff & Kristine Pakalniete & Eija Pouta & Katrin Rehdanz, 2020. "Contingent Behavior and Asymmetric Preferences for Baltic Sea Coastal Recreation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(1), pages 49-78, January.
    6. Barbara Sgouraki Kinsey & Hugh Bartling & Anne F. Peterson & Brady P. Baybeck, 2010. "Location of Public Goods and the Calculus of Voting: The Seattle Monorail Referendum," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 91(3), pages 741-761, September.
    7. A. Banerji & Jeevant Rampal, 2020. "Reverse Endowment Effect for a New Product," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 786-805, May.
    8. Levy-Garboua, L. & Blondel, S., 2000. "From Normative Rationality to Cognitive Consistency," Papiers d'Economie Mathématique et Applications 2000.67, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    9. Park, Chang Hee & Yoon, Tae Jung, 2022. "The dark side of up-selling promotions: Evidence from an analysis of cross-brand purchase behavior☆," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 647-666.
    10. Götte, Lorenz & Huffman, David B., 2005. "Do Emotions Improve Labor Market Outcomes?," IZA Discussion Papers 1895, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Fang, Zheng & Niimi, Yoko, 2015. "Do Losses Bite More than Gains? Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Analysis of Subjective Well-being in Japan," MPRA Paper 68059, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Christopher Boyce & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Nick Hanley & Charles Noussair & Michael Townsend & Steve Tucker, 2015. "The effects of emotions on preferences and choices for public goods," Working Papers 2015-13, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. Xu Guan & Yulan Wang & Zelong Yi & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2020. "Inducing Consumer Online Reviews Via Disclosure," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1956-1971, August.
    14. Tian, Ye & Chiu, Yi-Chang & Sun, Jian, 2019. "Understanding behavioral effects of tradable mobility credit scheme: An experimental economics approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Valeria Fanghella & Thi-Thanh-Tam Vu & Luigi Mittone, 2021. "Priming prosocial behavior and expectations in response to the Covid-19 pandemic -- Evidence from an online experiment," Papers 2102.13538, arXiv.org.
    16. Jidong Zhou, 2011. "Reference Dependence and Market Competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 1073-1097, December.
    17. Grösche, Peter, 2006. "Marktkonforme Möglichkeiten zur Forcierung privatwirtschaftlicher Investitionen in den Wohngebäudebestand zum Zwecke einer effizienteren Energieverwendung: Endbericht, April 2006," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 70901.
    18. Xingrong Hou & Jianmin Zeng & Hong Chen & Li Su, 2019. "The endowment effect in the genes: An exploratory study," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 293-298, May.
    19. Luigi Guiso, 2015. "A Test of Narrow Framing and its Origin," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 1(1), pages 61-100, March.
    20. Pingle, Mark & Mitchell, Mike, 2002. "What motivates positional concerns for income?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 127-148, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • K36 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Family and Personal Law
    • J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afd:wpaper:2501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFED (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afeddea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.