IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/209287.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains

In: Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 22

Author

Listed:
  • Flitsch, Verena
  • Brümmerstedt, Katrin

Abstract

Macroeconomic freight transport models serve as decision support for transport policy development. To evaluate infrastructure investments or policy measures these tools need to capture the underlying complexity of freight transport networks in a sufficient way. Recent developments in this field outline possibilities to combine aggregated and disaggregated approaches in freight transport modelling in order to integrate more realistic freight agent behaviour. In contrast to aggregated models, disaggregated approaches are able to simulate the decision behaviour on the microlevel of an individual decision maker. In maritime container supply chains liner carriers or their brokers/agents and freight forwarders face a variety of interconnected logistical choices such as carrier, port, mode, route, shipment, or inventory choice. Modelling at least parts of these choices in disaggregated way could be of high value for adequate maritime hinterland policy development. This paper provides both an overview of present freight transport models with and without a logistics step and applied methods to study maritime supply chain freight agents' behaviour. A summarizing framework for behavioural freight transport modelling in maritime container supply chains is introduced. Finally, the framework is applied to a container freight transport model under development.

Suggested Citation

  • Flitsch, Verena & Brümmerstedt, Katrin, 2015. "Freight Transport Modelling of Container Hinterland Supply Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.),Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 233-266, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/209287/1/hicl-2015-22-233.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Chow & Choon Yang & Amelia Regan, 2010. "State-of-the art of freight forecast modeling: lessons learned and the road ahead," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1011-1030, November.
    2. Dong-Wook Song & Ki-Tae Yeo, 2004. "A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 34-52, March.
    3. Tran, Nguyen Khoi, 2011. "Studying port selection on liner routes: An approach from logistics perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 39-53.
    4. Eelco van Asperen & Rommert Dekker, 2013. "Centrality, flexibility and floating stocks: A quantitative evaluation of port-of-entry choices," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 15(1), pages 72-100, March.
    5. Mary R Brooks & Sean M Puckett & David A Hensher & Adrian Sammons, 2012. "Understanding mode choice decisions: A study of Australian freight shippers," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(3), pages 274-299, September.
    6. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2013. "Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 311-316.
    7. Chinonye Ugboma & Ogochukwu Ugboma & Innocent C Ogwude, 2006. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach to Port Selection Decisions – Empirical Evidence from Nigerian Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(3), pages 251-266, September.
    8. Lorena Garcia-Alonso & Joaquín Sanchez-Soriano, 2009. "Port selection from a hinterland perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(3), pages 260-269, September.
    9. Durbach, Ian N. & Stewart, Theodor J., 2012. "Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 1-14.
    10. Matthew Malchow & Adib Kanafani, 2001. "A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing port selection," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 265-277, July.
    11. John Mangan & Chandra Lalwani & Bernard Gardner, 2001. "Identifying Relevant Variables and Modelling the Choice Process in Freight Transportation," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 3(3), pages 278-297, September.
    12. T C Lirn & H A Thanopoulou & M J Beynon & A K C Beresford, 2004. "An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 70-91, March.
    13. Chinonye Ugboma & Innocent C. Ogwude & Ogochukwu Ugboma & Kenneth Nnadi, 2007. "Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: an exploration," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 331-346, August.
    14. Murphy, Paul R. & Daley, James M. & Hall, Patricia K., 1997. "Carrier selection: Do shippers and carriers agree, or not?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-72, March.
    15. Simme Veldman & Lorena Garcia-Alonso & José Ángel Vallejo-Pinto, 2011. "Determinants of container port choice in Spain," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 509-522, January.
    16. Malchow, Matthew B. & Kanafani, Adib, 2004. "A disaggregate analysis of port selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 317-337, July.
    17. Tongzon, Jose & Heng, Wu, 2005. "Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 405-424, June.
    18. Loon Tang & Joyce Low & Shao Lam, 2011. "Understanding Port Choice Behavior—A Network Perspective," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 65-82, March.
    19. Jose Tongzon & Lavina Sawant, 2007. "Port choice in a competitive environment: from the shipping lines' perspective," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 477-492.
    20. Tsung-Yu Chou & Gin-Shuh Liang, 2001. "Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for shipping company performance evaluation," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 375-392, October.
    21. Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-291, March.
    22. Piyush Tiwari & Hidekazu Itoh & Masayuki Doi, 2003. "Shippers' Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 23-39, March.
    23. Chang, Young-Tae & Lee, Sang-Yoon & Tongzon, Jose L., 2008. "Port selection factors by shipping lines: Different perspectives between trunk liners and feeder service providers," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 877-885, November.
    24. Wang, Xin & Kopfer, Herbert & Gendreau, Michel, 2014. "Operational transportation planning of freight forwarding companies in horizontal coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1133-1141.
    25. Emmanuel Guy & Bruno Urli, 2006. "Port Selection and Multicriteria Analysis: An Application to the Montreal-New York Alternative," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(2), pages 169-186, June.
    26. Naima Saeed, 2009. "An analysis of carriers’ selection criteria when choosing container terminals in Pakistan," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(3), pages 270-288, September.
    27. Mateus Magala & Adrian Sammons, 2008. "A New Approach to Port Choice Modelling," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 10(1-2), pages 9-34, March.
    28. Gi-Tae Yeo & Adolf K.Y. Ng & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Zaili Yang, 2014. "Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 251-267, May.
    29. Christopher M Anderson & James J Opaluch & Thomas A Grigalunas, 2009. "The Demand for Import Services at US Container Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 11(2), pages 156-185, June.
    30. An-Shuen Nir & Kuang Lin & Gin-Shuh Liang, 2003. "Port choice behaviour--from the perspective of the shipper," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 165-173, January.
    31. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    32. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Jing Dai, 2012. "A decision support system for port selection," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 509-524, January.
    33. Talley, Wayne K., 2014. "Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 174-179.
    34. Lu, Chin-Shan, 2000. "Logistics services in Taiwanese maritime firms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 79-96, June.
    35. Koi Yu (Adolf) Ng, 2006. "Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(3), pages 234-250, September.
    36. Theo Notteboom, 2008. "Bundling of Freight Flows and Hinterland Network Developments," Chapters, in: Rob Konings & Hugo Priemus & Peter Nijkamp (ed.),The Future of Intermodal Freight Transport, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    37. Simme J Veldman & Ewout H Bückmann, 2003. "A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 3-22, March.
    38. Gerard Jong & Inge Vierth & Lori Tavasszy & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2013. "Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 347-371, February.
    39. Peter C. Wong & Hong Yan & Colin Bamford, 2008. "Evaluation of factors for carrier selection in the China Pearl River delta," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 27-52, February.
    40. Bart W. Wiegmans & Anthony Van Der Hoest & Theo E. Notteboom, 2008. "Port and terminal selection by deep-sea container operators," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 517-534, December.
    41. Tongzon, Jose L., 2009. "Port choice and freight forwarders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 186-195, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meersman, Hilde & Van de Voorde, Eddy, 2019. "Freight transport models: Ready to support transport policy of the future?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 97-101.
    2. América Ivonne Zamora Torres, 2019. "Cambio tecnológico y eficiencia logística del transporte de carga internacional a través del modelo DEA. (Technological change and efficiency of the logistics system of international freight through t," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 183-204, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.