IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Beyond Results: What Makes the Difference Between Argentina, Chile and Mexico in PISA 2009?

In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 6

Listed author(s):
  • Héctor R. Gertel


    (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)

  • Roberto F. Giuliodori


    (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)

  • Santiago Gastelu


    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)

  • María Luz Vera


    (Instituto de Economía y Finanzas (FCE-UNC))

Registered author(s):

    Considerable effort has been exercised in the construction of school achievement tests that provide international comparability of results. One of the most widely accepted studies for international comparison of student achievement is PISA. Argentina, Chile and Mexico mean score in language was quite similar in PISA 2000. However, a statistically significant gap developed during the decade, resulting in Chile and Mexico outperforming Argentina by some 50 and 30 points, respectively, in PISA 2009, and is the issue that motivates the research. This paper represents an attempt to develop some answers to the question of what makes the difference. Potential factors of policy interest explaining the gap in language test score between these countries are introduced through a linear model in which the relative effect of personal attributes of the student, relevant characteristics of his/her family and public/private school control are treated as covariates. The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition technique is then applied and allows us to explain the mean gap between these three countries in PISA 2009 reading test scores in terms of coefficient and characteristics effects. Preliminary results suggested that compared to Argentina, Chile performed better in both, coefficient and characteristics dimensions, and 66% of the 50 point gap was associated with coefficient effects. The Mexico-Argentina 23 point gap resulted from the former’s hefty coefficient effects overcompensating for its relatively poorer characteristics.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    in new window

    This chapter was published in:
  • Antonio Caparrós Ruiz (ed.), 2011. "Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación," E-books Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación, Asociación de Economía de la Educación, edition 1, volume 6, number 06.
  • This item is provided by Asociación de Economía de la Educación in its series Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 6 with number 06-05.
    Handle: RePEc:aec:ieed06:06-05
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Ben Jann, 2008. "A Stata implementation of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition," ETH Zurich Sociology Working Papers 5, ETH Zurich, Chair of Sociology, revised 14 May 2008.
    2. Frauke Kreuter & Richard Valliant, 2007. "A survey on survey statistics: What is done and can be done in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aec:ieed06:06-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.