IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/ppe589.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Stefanie Peer

Personal Details

First Name:Stefanie
Middle Name:
Last Name:Peer
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppe589
http://www.wu.ac.at/ruw/mitarbeiter/mitarbeiter/peer
Terminal Degree:2013 School of Business and Economics; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

(99%) Institut für Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft
Department Sozioökonomie
WU Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien

Wien, Austria
http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/ruw

:


RePEc:edi:irwuwat (more details at EDIRC)

(1%) Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie
School of Business and Economics
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Amsterdam, Netherlands
https://sbe.vu.nl/nl/afdelingen-en-instituten/spatial-economics/

:

De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam
RePEc:edi:vrevunl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Martin Adler & Stefanie Peer & Tanja Sinozic, 2019. "Autonomous, Connected, Electric Shared vehicles (ACES) and public finance: an explorative analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-005/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  2. Ondřej Krčál & Rostislav Staněk & Bára Karlínová & Stefanie Peer, 2019. "Real consequences matters: why hypothetical biases in the valuation of time persist even in controlled lab experiments," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2019-03, Masaryk University.
  3. Jasper Knockaert & Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "Identification of self-selection biases in field experiments using stated preference experiments," Natural Field Experiments 00568, The Field Experiments Website.
  4. Chaloupka, Christine & Kölbl, Robert & Loibl, Wolfgang & Molitor, Romain & Nentwich, Michael & Peer, Stefanie & Risser, Ralf & Sammer, Gerd & Schützhofer, Bettina & Seibt, Claus, 2015. "Nachhaltige Mobilität aus sozioökonomischer Perspektive – Diskussionspapier der Arbeitsgruppe "Sozioökonomische Aspekte" der ÖAW-Kommission "Nachhaltige Mobilität" (ITA-manu," ITA manu:scripts 15_02, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA).
  5. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Erik Verhoef, 2015. "Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-078/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  6. Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer & Thijs Dekker, 2014. "Memory, Expectation Formation and Scheduling Choices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-154/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  7. Eric Kroes & Paul R. Koster & Stefanie Peer, 2014. "A Practical Method to estimate the Benefits of Improved Network Reliability: An Application to Departing Air Passengers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-130/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  8. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Erik Verhoef, 2013. "Overreporting vs. Overreacting: Commuters' Perceptions of Travel Times," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-123/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2013.
  9. Stefanie Peer & Erik T. Verhoef, 2013. "Equilibrium at a Bottleneck when Long-Run and Short-Run Scheduling Preferences diverge," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-028/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
  10. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng & Erik Verhoef, 2011. "Door-to-Door Travel Times in RP Departure Time Choice Models: An Approximation Method based on GPS," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-180/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.
  11. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng, 2011. "Long-Run vs. Short-Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed-Preference Experiment among Peak-Hour Road Commuters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-181/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.
  12. Stefanie Peer & Carl Koopmans & Erik T. Verhoef, 2010. "Predicting Travel Time Variability for Cost-Benefit Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-071/3, Tinbergen Institute.

Articles

  1. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.
  2. Schmid, Basil & Jokubauskaite, Simona & Aschauer, Florian & Peer, Stefanie & Hössinger, Reinhard & Gerike, Regine & Jara-Diaz, Sergio R. & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "A pooled RP/SP mode, route and destination choice model to investigate mode and user-type effects in the value of travel time savings," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 262-294.
  3. Eric Kroes & Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer, 2018. "A practical method to estimate the benefits of improved road network reliability: an application to departing air passengers," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1433-1448, September.
  4. Peer, Stefanie & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "Temporal framing of stated preference experiments: does it affect valuations?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 319-333.
  5. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Train commuters’ scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 314-333.
  6. Koster, Paul & Peer, Stefanie & Dekker, Thijs, 2015. "Memory, expectation formation and scheduling choices," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 256-265.
  7. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin‐Yen Tseng, 2015. "Long‐Run Versus Short‐Run Perspectives On Consumer Scheduling: Evidence From A Revealed‐Preference Experiment Among Peak‐Hour Road Commuters," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 303-323, February.
  8. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Koster, Paul & Verhoef, Erik T., 2014. "Over-reporting vs. overreacting: Commuters’ perceptions of travel times," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 476-494.
  9. Peer, Stefanie & Verhoef, Erik T., 2013. "Equilibrium at a bottleneck when long-run and short-run scheduling preferences diverge," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 12-27.
  10. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Koster, Paul & Tseng, Yin-Yen & Verhoef, Erik T., 2013. "Door-to-door travel times in RP departure time choice models: An approximation method using GPS data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 134-150.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Erik Verhoef, 2015. "Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-078/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Jasper Knockaert & Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "Identification of self-selection biases in field experiments using stated preference experiments," Natural Field Experiments 00568, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2017. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," Working Papers halshs-01644639, HAL.
    3. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2019. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 16(2), pages 171-205, December.
    4. Jiang, Feng & Cacchiani, Valentina & Toth, Paolo, 2017. "Train timetabling by skip-stop planning in highly congested lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 149-174.
    5. Peer, Stefanie & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "Temporal framing of stated preference experiments: does it affect valuations?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 319-333.
    6. Yang, Hai & Tang, Yili, 2018. "Managing rail transit peak-hour congestion with a fare-reward scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 122-136.

  2. Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer & Thijs Dekker, 2014. "Memory, Expectation Formation and Scheduling Choices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-154/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2016. "The private (unnoticed) welfare cost of highway speeding behavior from time saving misperceptions," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 24-37.
    2. Ondřej Krčál & Rostislav Staněk & Bára Karlínová & Stefanie Peer, 2019. "Real consequences matters: why hypothetical biases in the valuation of time persist even in controlled lab experiments," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2019-03, Masaryk University.

  3. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Erik Verhoef, 2013. "Overreporting vs. Overreacting: Commuters' Perceptions of Travel Times," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-123/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2013.

    Cited by:

    1. Koster, Paul R. & Koster, Hans R.A., 2015. "Commuters’ preferences for fast and reliable travel: A semi-parametric estimation approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 289-301.
    2. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    3. Jasper Knockaert & Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "Identification of self-selection biases in field experiments using stated preference experiments," Natural Field Experiments 00568, The Field Experiments Website.
    4. Dixit, Vinayak & Jian, Sisi & Hassan, Asif & Robson, Edward, 2019. "Eliciting perceptions of travel time risk and exploring its impact on value of time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 36-45.
    5. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A. & Rose, John M., 2010. "Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 384-403, May.
    6. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 520-541.
    7. Ondřej Krčál & Rostislav Staněk & Bára Karlínová & Stefanie Peer, 2019. "Real consequences matters: why hypothetical biases in the valuation of time persist even in controlled lab experiments," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2019-03, Masaryk University.
    8. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:3, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    9. Varotto, Silvia F. & Glerum, Aurélie & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Bierlaire, Michel & Longo, Giovanni, 2017. "Mitigating the impact of errors in travel time reporting on mode choice modelling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 236-246.

  4. Stefanie Peer & Erik T. Verhoef, 2013. "Equilibrium at a Bottleneck when Long-Run and Short-Run Scheduling Preferences diverge," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-028/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Takayama, Yuki & Kuwahara, Masao, 2016. "Bottleneck congestion and residential location of heterogeneous commuters," MPRA Paper 68940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Takayama, Yuki, 2014. "Bottleneck congestion and distribution of work start times: The economics of staggered work hours revisited," MPRA Paper 59033, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng, 2011. "Long-Run vs. Short-Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed-Preference Experiment among Peak-Hour Road Commuters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-181/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.
    4. Takayama, Yuki & Kuwahara, Masao, 2016. "Scheduling preferences, parking competition, and bottleneck congestion: A model of trip timing and parking location choices by heterogeneous commuters," MPRA Paper 68938, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Erik (E.T.) Verhoef, 2017. "Optimal Congestion Pricing with Diverging Long-run and Short-run Scheduling Preferences," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-077/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

  5. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng & Erik Verhoef, 2011. "Door-to-Door Travel Times in RP Departure Time Choice Models: An Approximation Method based on GPS," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-180/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.

    Cited by:

    1. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Erik Verhoef, 2013. "Overreporting vs. Overreacting: Commuters' Perceptions of Travel Times," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-123/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2013.

  6. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng, 2011. "Long-Run vs. Short-Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed-Preference Experiment among Peak-Hour Road Commuters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-181/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.

    Cited by:

    1. Peer, Stefanie & Verhoef, Erik T., 2013. "Equilibrium at a bottleneck when long-run and short-run scheduling preferences diverge," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 12-27.
    2. Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer & Thijs Dekker, 2014. "Memory, Expectation Formation and Scheduling Choices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-154/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Jasper Knockaert & Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "Identification of self-selection biases in field experiments using stated preference experiments," Natural Field Experiments 00568, The Field Experiments Website.
    4. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Erik Verhoef, 2015. "Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-078/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Ondřej Krčál & Rostislav Staněk & Bára Karlínová & Stefanie Peer, 2019. "Real consequences matters: why hypothetical biases in the valuation of time persist even in controlled lab experiments," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2019-03, Masaryk University.
    6. Erik (E.T.) Verhoef, 2017. "Optimal Congestion Pricing with Diverging Long-run and Short-run Scheduling Preferences," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-077/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

  7. Stefanie Peer & Carl Koopmans & Erik T. Verhoef, 2010. "Predicting Travel Time Variability for Cost-Benefit Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-071/3, Tinbergen Institute.

    Cited by:

    1. Bergström, Anna & Krüger, Niclas, 2013. "Modeling Passenger Train Delay Distributions - Evidence and Implications," Karlstad University Working Papers in Economics 10, Karlstad University, Department of Economics.
    2. Paul Koster & Eric Pels & Erik Verhoef, 2016. "The User Costs of Air Travel Delay Variability," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 120-131, February.
    3. Eric Kroes & Paul R. Koster & Stefanie Peer, 2014. "A Practical Method to estimate the Benefits of Improved Network Reliability: An Application to Departing Air Passengers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-130/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Jeremy Webb & Max Briggs & Clevo Wilson, 2018. "Breaking automotive modal lock-in: a choice modelling study of Jakarta commuters," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(1), pages 47-68, January.
    5. Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer & Thijs Dekker, 2014. "Memory, Expectation Formation and Scheduling Choices," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-154/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    6. Bardal, Kjersti Granås & Mathisen, Terje Andreas, 2015. "Winter problems on mountain passes – Implications for cost-benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 59-72.
    7. Sjoerd van der Spoel & Chintan Amrit & Jos van Hillegersberg, 2017. "Predictive analytics for truck arrival time estimation: a field study at a European distribution centre," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 5062-5078, September.
    8. Paul Koster & Hans Koster, 2013. "Analysing Heterogeneity in the Value of Travel Time and Reliability: A Semiparametric Estimation Approach," ERSA conference papers ersa13p1032, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Wang, Qian & Sundberg, Marcus & Karlström, Anders, 2013. "Scheduling choices under rank dependent utility maximization," Working papers in Transport Economics 2013:16, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    10. Eric Kroes & Paul Koster & Stefanie Peer, 2018. "A practical method to estimate the benefits of improved road network reliability: an application to departing air passengers," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1433-1448, September.
    11. Alejandro Tirachini & David Hensher & Michiel Bliemer, 2014. "Accounting for travel time variability in the optimal pricing of cars and buses," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 947-971, September.
    12. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng, 2011. "Long-Run vs. Short-Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed-Preference Experiment among Peak-Hour Road Commuters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-181/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.
    13. de Jong, Gerard C. & Bliemer, Michiel C.J., 2015. "On including travel time reliability of road traffic in appraisal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 80-95.
    14. Eliasson, Jonas, 2019. "Modelling reliability benefits," MPRA Paper 94817, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Ian Parry, 2014. "Designing Fiscal Policy to Address the External Costs of Energy," CESifo Working Paper Series 5128, CESifo Group Munich.

Articles

  1. Lehner, Stephan & Peer, Stefanie, 2019. "The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 177-191.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Albalate & Albert Gragera, 2019. "“The impact of curbside parking regulations on car ownership”," IREA Working Papers 201909, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jun 2019.
    2. Dave, Sanjaykumar M. & Joshi, Gaurang J. & Ravinder, Kayitha & Gore, Ninad, 2019. "Data monitoring for the assessment of on-street parking demand in CBD areas of developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-171.

  2. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Verhoef, Erik T., 2016. "Train commuters’ scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 314-333.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Koster, Paul & Peer, Stefanie & Dekker, Thijs, 2015. "Memory, expectation formation and scheduling choices," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 256-265.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin‐Yen Tseng, 2015. "Long‐Run Versus Short‐Run Perspectives On Consumer Scheduling: Evidence From A Revealed‐Preference Experiment Among Peak‐Hour Road Commuters," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56, pages 303-323, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Abegaz, Dereje & Hjorth, Katrine & Rich, Jeppe, 2017. "Testing the slope model of scheduling preferences on stated preference data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 409-436.
    2. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A. & Rose, John M., 2010. "Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 384-403, May.
    3. Lindsey, Robin & de Palma, André & Silva, Hugo E., 2019. "Equilibrium in a dynamic model of congestion with large and small users," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 82-107.
    4. Beck, Matthew J. & Hess, Stephane & Cabral, Manuel Ojeda & Dubernet, Ilka, 2017. "Valuing travel time savings: A case of short-term or long term choices?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 133-143.

  5. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Koster, Paul & Verhoef, Erik T., 2014. "Over-reporting vs. overreacting: Commuters’ perceptions of travel times," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 476-494.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Peer, Stefanie & Verhoef, Erik T., 2013. "Equilibrium at a bottleneck when long-run and short-run scheduling preferences diverge," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 12-27. See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Peer, Stefanie & Knockaert, Jasper & Koster, Paul & Tseng, Yin-Yen & Verhoef, Erik T., 2013. "Door-to-door travel times in RP departure time choice models: An approximation method using GPS data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 134-150.

    Cited by:

    1. Li, Zheng & Hensher, David A. & Rose, John M., 2010. "Willingness to pay for travel time reliability in passenger transport: A review and some new empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 384-403, May.
    2. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Erik Verhoef, 2015. "Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-078/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    3. Zhao, Yun & Yu, Hongbo, 2018. "A door-to-door travel time approach for evaluating modal competition of intercity travel: A focus on the proposed Dallas-Houston HSR route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 13-22.
    4. Dubé, Jean & Legros, Diègo & Thériault, Marius & Des Rosiers, François, 2014. "A spatial Difference-in-Differences estimator to evaluate the effect of change in public mass transit systems on house prices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 24-40.
    5. Paul Koster & Hans Koster, 2013. "Analysing Heterogeneity in the Value of Travel Time and Reliability: A Semiparametric Estimation Approach," ERSA conference papers ersa13p1032, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Wong, Wai & Wong, S.C., 2015. "Systematic bias in transport model calibration arising from the variability of linear data projection," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Stefanie Peer & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Erik Verhoef, 2013. "Overreporting vs. Overreacting: Commuters' Perceptions of Travel Times," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-123/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2013.
    8. Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef & Jasper Knockaert & Paul Koster & Yin-Yen Tseng, 2011. "Long-Run vs. Short-Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed-Preference Experiment among Peak-Hour Road Commuters," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 11-181/3, Tinbergen Institute, revised 25 Aug 2014.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 12 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-TRE: Transport Economics (9) 2012-05-29 2013-03-02 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-07-11 2019-02-04. Author is listed
  2. NEP-URE: Urban & Real Estate Economics (7) 2011-02-26 2013-03-02 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-07-11 2019-02-04. Author is listed
  3. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (4) 2015-04-25 2015-04-25 2015-07-11 2016-10-16
  4. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (4) 2015-04-25 2015-07-11 2016-10-16 2019-03-04
  5. NEP-UPT: Utility Models & Prospect Theory (2) 2016-10-16 2019-03-04
  6. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (1) 2012-05-29
  7. NEP-ENE: Energy Economics (1) 2019-02-04
  8. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2015-11-15
  9. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2019-02-04
  10. NEP-TUR: Tourism Economics (1) 2013-03-02

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Stefanie Peer should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.