Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/n/nep-upt/2016-10-16.html
Report NEP-UPT-2016-10-16
This is the archive for NEP-UPT, a report on new working papers in the area of Utility Models and Prospect Theory. Alexander Harin issued this report. It is usually issued weekly.Subscribe to this report: email, RSS, or Mastodon, or Bluesky.
Other reports in NEP-UPT
The following items were announced in this report:
- Jakusch, Sven Thorsten & Meyer, Steffen & Hackethal, Andreas, 2019, "Taming models of prospect theory in the wild? Estimation of Vlcek and Hens (2011)," SAFE Working Paper Series, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, number 146, revised 2019, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2845338.
- Clark, Ephraim & Qiao, Zhuo & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2016, "Theories of Risk: Testing Investor Behaviour on the Taiwan Stock and Stock Index Futures Markets," MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany, number 74344, Apr.
- Mark Schneider, 2016, "Dual Process Utility Theory: A Model of Decisions Under Risk and Over Time," Working Papers, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute, number 16-23.
- Müller, Stephan & Rau, Holger A., 2017, "Decisions under uncertainty in social contexts," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics, number 290, revised 2017.
- Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017, "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, number 148, revised 2017, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2845871.
- Brit Grosskopf & Graeme Pearce, 2016, "Do you mind me paying less? Measuring Other-Regarding Preferences in the Market for Taxis," Natural Field Experiments, The Field Experiments Website, number 00556.
- Hackethal, Andreas & Jakusch, Sven Thorsten & Meyer, Steffen, 2016, "Taring all investors with the same brush? Evidence for heterogeneity in individual preferences from a maximum likelihood approach," SAFE Working Paper Series, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, number 147, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2845866.
- Noé Biheng & Jean-Marc Bonnisseau, 2015, "Regular economies with ambiguity aversion," Post-Print, HAL, number halshs-01185486, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.04.004.
- Santosh Anagol & Vimal Balasubramaniam & Tarun Ramadorai, 2016, "Endowment Effects in the Field: Evidence from India's IPO Lotteries," Natural Field Experiments, The Field Experiments Website, number 00551.
- Jasper Knockaert & Stefanie Peer & Erik Verhoef, 2016, "Identification of self-selection biases in field experiments using stated preference experiments," Natural Field Experiments, The Field Experiments Website, number 00568.
- Item repec:hal:wpaper:halshs-01294917 is not listed on IDEAS anymore
- Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2016, "Stochastic representatitve agent," Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, number 1536, Sep.
- Tsang, Chun-Kei & Wong, Wing-Keung & Horowitz, Ira, 2016, "Arbitrage Opportunities, Efficiency, and the Role of Risk Preferences in the Hong Kong Property Market," MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany, number 74347, May.
- Romina Boarini & Fabrice Murtin & Paul Schreyer & Marc Fleurbaey, 2016, "Multi-dimensional Living Standards: A Welfare Measure Based on Preferences," OECD Statistics Working Papers, OECD Publishing, number 2016/5, Oct, DOI: 10.1787/5jlpq7qvxc6f-en.
- Dmitry Taubinsky & Alex Rees-Jones, 2016, "Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment," Natural Field Experiments, The Field Experiments Website, number 00563.