IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to follow this author

Graham Loomes

This is information that was supplied by Graham Loomes in registering through RePEc. If you are Graham Loomes, you may change this information at the RePEc Author Service. Or if you are not registered and would like to be listed as well, register at the RePEc Author Service. When you register or update your RePEc registration, you may identify the papers and articles you have authored.

Personal Details

First Name:Graham
Middle Name:
Last Name:Loomes
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:plo422
in new window
  1. Andrea Isoni & Peter Brooks & Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden, 2011. "Do markets reveal preferences - or shape them?," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 11-03, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  2. Graham Loomes & José Luis Pinto-Prades & Jose Maria Abellan-Perpinan & Eva Rodriguez-Miguez, 2010. "Modelling Noise and Imprecision in Individual Decisions," Working Papers 10.03, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  3. Jose Luis Pinto & Raul Brey & Graham Loomes, 2009. "Trying to estimate a monetary value for qualy," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2009/03, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
  4. Graham Loomes & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2009. "Preference reversals and disparities between willingness to pay and willingness to accept in repeated markets," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 09-07, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  5. Andrea Isoni & Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden, 2009. "The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the "endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experiemntal procedures for eliciting valuations: A reassessment," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 09-14, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  6. Jose Luis Pinto Prades & Graham Loomes & Raul Brey, 2008. "Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY," Working Papers 08.09, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  7. Anne Spencer & Judith Covey & Angela Robinson & Graham Loomes, 2007. "Are Some Deaths Worse Than Others? The Effect of 'Labelling' on People's Perceptions," Working Papers 620, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
  8. Angela Robinson & Judith Covey & Anne Spencer & Graham Loomes, 2007. "Are Some Deaths Worse Than Others? Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment," Working Papers 597, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
  9. Loomes, Graham & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2002. "Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets?," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 132, Royal Economic Society.
  10. Loomes, G. & Moffatt, P.G. & Sugden, R., 1998. "A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice," University of East Anglia Discussion Papers in Economics 9806, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
  11. D.J. Butler & G. Loomes, 1992. "Procedural Rationality in Consumer Search: An experimental investigation," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 92-14, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
  12. Graham Loomes & Uzi Segal, "undated". "Observing Different Orders of Risk Aversion," Discussion Papers 92/5, Department of Economics, University of York.
  1. David Butler & Andrea Isoni & Graham Loomes & Kei Tsutsui, 2014. "Beyond choice: investigating the sensitivity and validity of measures of strength of preference," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 537-563, December.
  2. David Butler & Andrea Isoni & Graham Loomes & Daniel Navarro-Martinez, 2014. "On the Measurement of Strength of Preference in Units of Money," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 90, pages 1-15, 06.
  3. Graham Loomes & Ganna Pogrebna, 2014. "Testing for independence while allowing for probabilistic choice," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 189-211, December.
  4. Graham Loomes & Ganna Pogrebna, 2014. "Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes when Preferences are Imprecise," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(576), pages 569-593, 05.
  5. David Butler & Andrea Isoni & Graham Loomes, 2012. "Testing the ‘standard’ model of stochastic choice under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 191-213, December.
  6. Andrea Isoni & Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden, 2011. "The Willingness to Pay—Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 991-1011, April.
  7. Butler, David & Loomes, Graham, 2011. "Imprecision as an account of violations of independence and betweenness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 511-522.
  8. Nicholas Bardsley & Chris Starmer & Robin Cubitt & Graham Loomes & Peter Moffatt & Robert Sugden, 2011. "A response to Binmore, Harrison and Ross on Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 195-199.
  9. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 2010. "Preference reversals and disparities between willingness to pay and willingness to accept in repeated markets," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 374-387, June.
  10. Brett Day & Graham Loomes, 2010. "Conflicting violations of transitivity and where they may lead us," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 233-242, February.
  11. Robinson, Angela & Covey, Judith & Spencer, Anne & Loomes, Graham, 2010. "Are some deaths worse than others? The effect of 'labelling' on people's perceptions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 444-455, June.
  12. Judith Covey & Angela Robinson & Michael Jones-Lee & Graham Loomes, 2010. "Responsibility, scale and the valuation of rail safety," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 85-108, February.
  13. Graham Loomes & Shepley Orr & Robert Sugden, 2009. "Taste uncertainty and status quo effects in consumer choice," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 113-135, October.
  14. Pinto-Prades, Jose Luis & Loomes, Graham & Brey, Raul, 2009. "Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 553-562, May.
  15. Judith Covey & Graham Loomes & Ian J. Bateman, 2007. "Valuing risk reductions: Testing for range biases in payment card and random card sorting methods," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(4), pages 467-482.
  16. David J. Butler & Graham C. Loomes, 2007. "Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal Phenomenon," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 277-297, March.
  17. Ian Bateman & Brett Day & Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden, 2007. "Can ranking techniques elicit robust values?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 49-66, February.
  18. Graham Loomes & Judith Mehta, 2007. "The sensitivity of subjective probability to time and elicitation method," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 201-216, June.
  19. Loomes, Graham, 2006. "(How) Can we value health, safety and the environment?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 713-736, December.
  20. Graham Loomes, 2005. "Modelling the Stochastic Component of Behaviour in Experiments: Some Issues for the Interpretation of Data," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 8(4), pages 301-323, December.
  21. Jagadish Guria & Joanne Leung & Michael Jones-Lee & Graham Loomes, 2005. "The Willingness to Accept Value of Statistical Life Relative to the Willingness to Pay Value: Evidence and Policy Implications," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 113-127, 09.
  22. Graham Loomes & Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden, 2003. "Do Anomalies Disappear in Repeated Markets?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages 153-166, March.
  23. Loomes, Graham & Moffatt, Peter G & Sugden, Robert, 2002. "A Microeconometric Test of Alternative Stochastic Theories of Risky Choice," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 103-130, March.
  24. Loomes, Graham, 1999. "Experimental Economics: Introduction," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(453), pages 1-4, February.
  25. Loomes, Graham, 1999. "Some Lessons from Past Experiments and Some Challenges for the Future," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 109(453), pages 35-45, February.
  26. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1998. "Testing Different Stochastic Specifications of Risky Choice," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 65(260), pages 581-598, November.
  27. Loomes, Graham, 1998. "Probabilities vs Money: A Test of Some Fundamental Assumptions about Rational Decision Making," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(447), pages 477-489, March.
  28. Butler, David & Loomes, Graham, 1997. "Quasi-rational Search under Incomplete Information: Some Evidence from Experiments," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 65(2), pages 127-144, March.
  29. Beattie, Jane & Loomes, Graham, 1997. "The Impact of Incentives upon Risky Choice Experiments," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 155-168, March.
  30. Dubourg, W R & Jones-Lee, M W & Loomes, Graham, 1997. "Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 64(256), pages 681-702, November.
  31. Jones-Lee, Michael W & Loomes, Graham & Philips, P R, 1995. "Valuing the Prevention of Non-fatal Road Injuries: Contingent Valuation vs. Standard Gambles," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 676-695, October.
  32. Jones-Lee, Michael W & Loomes, Graham, 1995. "Discounting and Safety," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 501-512, July.
  33. Jones-Lee, M W & Loomes, G, 1995. "Scale and Context Effects in the Valuation of Transport Safety," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 183-203, December.
  34. Loomes, Graham, 1995. "The myth of the HYE," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-7, May.
  35. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1995. "Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(3-4), pages 641-648, April.
  36. Dubourg, W R & Jones-Lee, M W & Loomes, Graham, 1994. "Imprecise Preferences and the WTP-WTA Disparity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 115-133, October.
  37. Burrows, Paul & Loomes, Graham, 1994. "The Impact of Fairness on Bargaining Behaviour," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 201-221.
  38. Loomes, Graham & Segal, Uzi, 1994. "Observing Different Orders of Risk Aversion," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 239-256, December.
  39. Loomes, Graham & Taylor, Caron, 1992. "Non-transitive Preferences over Gains and Losses," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 102(411), pages 357-365, March.
  40. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1992. "Are Preferences Monotonic? Testing Some Predictions of Regret Theory," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 59(233), pages 17-33, February.
  41. Loomes, Graham, 1991. "Evidence of a New Violation of the Independence Axiom," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 91-108, January.
  42. Loomes, Graham, 1991. "Testing Decision Theories by Using 'Value Equivalences'," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 644-666, October.
  43. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1991. "Observing Violations of Transitivity by Experimental Methods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 425-439, March.
  44. Loomes, Graham & McKenzie, Lynda, 1989. "The use of QALYs in health care decision making," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 299-308, January.
  45. Loomes, Graham & Starmer, Chris & Sugden, Robert, 1989. "Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-transitive Choice?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(395), pages 140-151, Supplemen.
  46. Loomes, Graham, 1988. "When Actions Speak Louder Than Prospects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(3), pages 463-470, June.
  47. Loomes, Graham, 1988. "Further Evidence of the Impact of Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 55(217), pages 47-62, February.
  48. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1987. "Testing for Regret and Disappointment in Choice under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 97(388a), pages 118-129, Supplemen.
  49. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1987. "Some implications of a more general form of regret theory," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-287, April.
  50. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1984. "Regret Theory and Information: A Reply," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(375), pages 649-650, September.
  51. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1983. "Regret theory and measurable utility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 19-21.
  52. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1983. "A Rationale for Preference Reversal," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(3), pages 428-432, June.
  53. Loomes, Graham C, 1982. "Choices Involving a Risk of Death: An Empirical Study," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 29(3), pages 272-282, November.
  54. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1982. "Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(368), pages 805-824, December.
  1. Graham Loomes & Simone Blackburn, 2014. "Towards a more complex model of risky choice," Chapters,in: Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 4, pages 73-98 Edward Elgar Publishing.
  1. Weber,Elke U. & Baron,Jonathan & Loomes,Graham (ed.), 2011. "Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521176323, February.
  2. Weber,Elke U. & Baron,Jonathan & Loomes,Graham (ed.), 2001. "Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521772389, February.
NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 9 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CBE: Cognitive & Behavioural Economics (4) 2008-01-12 2008-01-12 2009-12-19 2010-04-17. Author is listed
  2. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (3) 2008-01-12 2009-12-19 2010-04-17. Author is listed
  3. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (3) 2007-05-19 2008-01-12 2008-05-24. Author is listed
  4. NEP-UPT: Utility Models & Prospect Theory (3) 2008-01-12 2009-12-19 2010-04-17. Author is listed
  5. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (1) 2007-05-19
This author is among the top 5% authors according to these criteria:
  1. Average Rank Score
  2. Number of Distinct Works, Weighted by Simple Impact Factor
  3. Number of Distinct Works, Weighted by Number of Authors and Simple Impact Factors
  4. Number of Citations
  5. Number of Citations, Discounted by Citation Age
  6. Number of Citations, Weighted by Simple Impact Factor
  7. Number of Citations, Weighted by Simple Impact Factor, Discounted by Citation Age
  8. Number of Citations, Weighted by Recursive Impact Factor
  9. Number of Citations, Weighted by Recursive Impact Factor, Discounted by Citation Age
  10. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors
  11. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors, Discounted by Citation Age
  12. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors and Simple Impact Factors
  13. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors and Simple Impact Factors, Discounted by Citation Age
  14. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors and Recursive Impact Factors
  15. Number of Citations, Weighted by Number of Authors and Recursive Impact Factors, Discounted by Citation Age
  16. h-index
  17. Number of Registered Citing Authors
  18. Number of Registered Citing Authors, Weighted by Rank (Max. 1 per Author)
  19. Number of Journal Pages
  20. Number of Journal Pages, Weighted by Simple Impact Factor
  21. Number of Journal Pages, Weighted by Recursive Impact Factor
  22. Number of Journal Pages, Weighted by Number of Authors
  23. Number of Journal Pages, Weighted by Number of Authors and Simple Impact Factors
  24. Number of Journal Pages, Weighted by Number of Authors and Recursive Impact Factors
  25. Euclidian citation score
  26. Breadth of citations across fields
  27. Wu-Index

Most cited item

Most downloaded item (past 12 months)

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Graham Loomes should log into the RePEc Author Service

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.