IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodcs/24.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Public Support for Science and Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Productivity Commission

Abstract

The Productivity Commission’s research report into ‘Public Support for Science and Innovation’ was released March 2007. The Australian Government asked the Commission to evaluate the economic, social and environmental returns on this investment. The main message from the Commission’s report is that there are widespread economic, social and environmental benefits to Australia from supporting science and innovation. However, the Commission identified a number of stresses in the science and innovation system that need resolution. The Commission proposes changes to certain business programs, including the R&D tax concession. It believes there is a better chance of stimulating R&D in the business sector if changes are made to the design and scope of the tax concession. The Commission also makes findings in relation to program evaluation, governance issues and intellectual property frameworks. The Commission canvasses some options that might increase the possibility of net benefits from the recent Government decision to adopt the Research Quality Framework. The Commission favours a scheme that is more strongly weighted against the poorest research performers than apparently currently envisaged. But as the Research Quality Framework evolves, the Commission suggests the use of a lower cost, risk minimisation approach that only applies to poor performing areas in universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Productivity Commission, 2007. "Public Support for Science and Innovation," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 24.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:24
    Note: 901 pages
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/37123/science.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/science/docs/finalreport
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sinnewe, Elisabeth & Charles, Michael B. & Keast, Robyn, 2016. "Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 195-204.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (MAPS). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.