IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ces/ifofob/82.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Reform of the income tax: the rate of the Federal State of Lower Saxony

Author

Listed:
  • Clemens Fuest
  • Stefanie Gäbler
  • Björn Kauder
  • Luisa Lorenz
  • Martin Mosler
  • Luisa Dörr

Abstract

This study investigates four reform options that lead to tax relief for low and medium-income earners, while moderately burdening higher income-earners. The solidarity surcharge is abolished. The minimum exempted income and the lowest marginal income tax rate remain unchanged in all scenarios. The upper limit of the second tax bracket is always increased to 58,000 euros, whereas the upper limit of the third tax bracket (the amount as of which the "wealth tax" has been applied to date) is dropped to 150,000 euros. The marginal tax rates at the second and third borders are increased to 45 and 49%, respectively. In reform option I, for example, the end of the first bracket is shifted from 14,000 euros to 25,000 euros and the marginal tax rate is raised from 24% to 30.5%. Taxpayers in the lower and middle income tax brackets are far better off. For childless (single) individuals the tax burden increases when their gross income exceeds 112,500 euros. Relative to their gross income, taxpayers in the seventh income decile benefit the most. The fiscal costs of this scenario amount to 10.7 billion euros. For reform option II, which completely removes the middle-class bulge, the losses in tax revenues, by contrast, would be 39.3 billion euros. Childless (single) taxpayers would only bear an additional burden if they earn more than around 160,000 euros in gross income. The maximum relative relief occurs in the eighth income decile, and the only tax increase occurs in the tenth decile.

Suggested Citation

  • Clemens Fuest & Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "Reform of the income tax: the rate of the Federal State of Lower Saxony," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 82.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifo_Forschungsberichte_82_2017_Fuest_etal_reform_einkommensteuer_niedersachsen-tarif.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sommer Eric & Pestel Nico & Schnabel Reinhold & Siegloch Sebastian & Spermann Alexander, 2016. "Ist eine Glättung des Mittelstandsbauchs finanzierbar?: Eine Mikrosimulationsstudie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 264-275, September.
    2. Gruber, Jon & Saez, Emmanuel, 2002. "The elasticity of taxable income: evidence and implications," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 1-32, April.
    3. Houben, Henriette & Baumgarten, Jörg, 2011. "Krankt das deutsche Steuersystem am Mittelstandsbauch und der kalten Progession?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 119, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    4. Martin Beznoska & Clemens Fuest & Thilo Schaefer, 2016. "Wirkungen einer Beseitigung des „Mittelstandsbauchs“ im Einkommensteuertarif [Effects of Levelling the “Middle Class Bulge” in the German Income Tax Tariff]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 96(9), pages 655-659, September.
    5. Clemens Fuest & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Niklas Potrafke & Florian Dorn, 2016. "Hidden tax increases - the extra tax burden of the bracket creep and the expected impact of income tax rates "on wheels" on tax reliefs," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 76, October.
    6. Manfred Rose, 2011. "Vorschlag für eine Reform des Einkommensteuertarifs," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 91(5), pages 323-327, May.
    7. Oecd, 2017. "Tuition fee reforms and international mobility," Education Indicators in Focus 51, OECD Publishing.
    8. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "The removal of the middle class bulge - models and costs," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 77, October.
    9. Stefan Bach & Peter Haan & Richard Ochmann, 2013. "Reformvorschläge zur Einkommensteuer: mehr echte und weniger kalte Progression," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 80(30), pages 3-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Luisa Lorenz & Niklas Potrafke, 2018. "In Search of a Government – on the Results of the Exploratory Talks between the CDU/CSU and the SPD," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(05), pages 30-34, March.
    2. Dieter Dziadkowski, 2018. "Plea for a Realistic Income Tax Rate Structure," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(11), pages 35-47, June.
    3. Florian Dorn & Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Luisa Lorenz & Niklas Potrafke, 2017. "Income Tax in Germany – Is There a Need for Reform?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(15), pages 31-37, August.
    4. Maximilian Joseph Blömer & Andreas Peichl, 2020. "The ifo Tax and Transfer Behavioral Microsimulation Model," ifo Working Paper Series 335, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Dorn & Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Luisa Lorenz & Niklas Potrafke, 2017. "Income Tax in Germany – Is There a Need for Reform?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(15), pages 31-37, August.
    2. Dieter Dziadkowski, 2018. "Plea for a Realistic Income Tax Rate Structure," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(11), pages 35-47, June.
    3. Lemmer, Jens, 2017. "Leistungsfeindlicher Mittelstandsbauch: Gerechtigkeitslücke im Einkommensteuertarif schließen," DSi kompakt 27, DSi - Deutsches Steuerzahlerinstitut des Bundes der Steuerzahler e.V., Berlin.
    4. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "The removal of the middle class bulge - models and costs," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 77, October.
    5. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Fabian Häring & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "Eliminating the Middle-class Bulge – Income Tax Reform Options and their Fiscal Costs," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(09), pages 31-38, May.
    6. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Potrafke. Niklas & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "Bracket Creep – Distribution Effects of a Rolling Income Tax Rate," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(03), pages 28-39, February.
    7. Florian Dorn & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Niklas Potrafke, 2017. "Inheritance Tax in Germany – Need for Reform and Compromises," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(01), pages 33-40, January.
    8. Florian Dorn & Clemens Fuest & Björn Kauder & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Niklas Potrafke & Luisa Dörr, 2017. "Tax Increases Via the Back Door – Fiscal Revenue Impact of Bracket Creep," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 70(02), pages 51-58, January.
    9. Blumkin, Tomer & Sadka, Efraim & Shem-Tov, Yotam, 2011. "Labor Migration and the Case for Flat Tax," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275759, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Hellwig, Christian & Werquin, Nicolas, 2022. "A Fair Day's Pay for a Fair Day's Work: Optimal Tax Design as Redistributional Arbitrage," TSE Working Papers 22-1284, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jan 2023.
    11. Nicole Simpson & Devin Reilly & Kartik Athreya, 2010. "The Earned Income Tax Credit: Insurance Without Disincentives?," 2010 Meeting Papers 1103, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    12. Bas Jacobs, 2013. "Optimal redistributive tax and education policies in general equilibrium," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(2), pages 312-337, April.
    13. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Matthieu Lequien & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2017. "Tax Simplicity and Heterogeneous Learning," NBER Working Papers 24049, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Junyi Zhu, 2014. "Bracket Creep Revisited - with and without r > g: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 23(3), pages 106-158, November.
    15. Matthias Krapf & David Staubli, 2020. "The Corporate Elasticity of Taxable Income: Event Study Evidence from Switzerland," CESifo Working Paper Series 8715, CESifo.
    16. Peter G. Backus & Nicky L. Grant, 2019. "How sensitive is the average taxpayer to changes in the tax-price of giving?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 26(2), pages 317-356, April.
    17. da Costa, Carlos E. & Pereira, Thiago, 2014. "On the efficiency of equal sacrifice income tax schedules," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 399-418.
    18. Britton, Jack & Gruber, Jonathan, 2020. "Do income contingent student loans reduce labor supply?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Stefan Bach, 2014. ""Reichensteuer"-Diskussion: Hintergrund und Perspektiven," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 16, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Findeisen, Sebastian & Sachs, Dominik, 2014. "Efficient Labor and Capital Income Taxation over the Life Cycle," Working Papers 14-17, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifofob:82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.