IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/341088.html

Does the usage of online agricultural information reduce agrochemical expenses in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Junzhe
  • Kuhn, Lena
  • Bobojonov, Ihtiyor
  • Babadjanova, Mashkhura
  • Sun, Zhanli

Abstract

Motivated by growing concerns about excessive agrochemical use and the resulting environmental pollution in China, this study explores the importance of online agricultural information for chemical fertilizer and pesticide use decisions among grain farmers. In particular, we focus on the functional agricultural information used for productive purposes for smallholders. Based on a survey dataset of 1,833 family farms across five Chinese provinces, we employ a propensity score matching (PSM) approach to estimate treatment effects of online agricultural information. The results reveal that online acquisition of agricultural information does not reduce the expenses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides in our sample; rather, the opposite is true. The use of online agricultural information significantly increased agrochemical expenses, particularly among smallholders. Within our sample region, the limited evolution of online information content and the inherent challenges faced by smallholder farmers are the major barriers to the beneficial effects of online agricultural information in reducing agrochemical use. Our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions and educational efforts to bridge the knowledge gaps of smallholders. Furthermore, there is a need to raise awareness among information providers to ensure that their recommendations avoid encouraging overdoses of agrochemicals. In addition, enhancing farmers’ digital literacy will be a future task of development policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Junzhe & Kuhn, Lena & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Babadjanova, Mashkhura & Sun, Zhanli, 2026. "Does the usage of online agricultural information reduce agrochemical expenses in China?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(6), pages 2255-2267.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:341088
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2026.04.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341088/1/Hu_2026_agrochemical_expenses_China.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jia.2026.04.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:341088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.