IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i5p5764-5780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographical indication, agricultural development and the alleviation of rural relative poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Sihui Zhang
  • Yong Sun
  • Yalin Wang
  • Xiaoxi Lin

Abstract

Sustainable development is the power source to promote rural economic and social prosperity and the necessary guarantee for rural revitalization, while rural relative poverty alleviation is the inherent requirement for promoting sustainable development and realizing rural revitalization. The pro‐agricultural attribute of geographical indication determines that it can be an important tool to alleviate rural relative poverty. This study analyzes the relationship between geographical indication and rural relative poverty alleviation, as well as the mediating role of agricultural industry agglomeration and the moderating role of agricultural scale operation. We use global Moran's I and spatial Durbin models to achieve these objectives, using panel data from 218 cities in China spanning from 2008 to 2019. The results show that: (1) During the study period, relative poverty in China exhibits a distinct pattern of contiguous distribution, and there has been a significant reduction in the number of areas with high levels. Notable progress has been made in alleviating relative poverty in the central, northeastern, and southern regions of China. (2) Geographical indication can alleviate rural relative poverty not only within its region but also in neighboring regions. (3) Geographical indication can alleviate rural relative poverty through agricultural industry agglomeration, and agricultural scale operation can strengthen the relative poverty alleviation effect of geographical indication. This paper enriches the study of relative poverty alleviation mechanisms and reveals how geographical indications can help. The results can provide useful insights for poverty alleviation in poor areas through geographical indication and a new practice path for rural revitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihui Zhang & Yong Sun & Yalin Wang & Xiaoxi Lin, 2024. "Geographical indication, agricultural development and the alleviation of rural relative poverty," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5764-5780, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5764-5780
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2997
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tasso Adamopoulos & Diego Restuccia, 2014. "The Size Distribution of Farms and International Productivity Differences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(6), pages 1667-1697, June.
    2. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    3. Yingchao Li & Ruyu Du & Linli Li & Guanghui Jiang & Zhiyuan Fan, 2020. "Influences of the Transaction Intention of Farmland Transfer under Information Asymmetry: An Empirical Study of 1100 Questionnaires from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao, 2022. "How does digital inclusive finance affect carbon intensity?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 174-190.
    5. Tian, Guangjin & Duan, Jinlong & Yang, Lan, 2021. "Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Zerong Wang & Donghao Zhang & Jiancheng Wang, 2022. "How does digital finance impact the leverage of Chinese households?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(6), pages 555-558, March.
    7. repec:ehl:lserod:110767 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Shuang Zhao & Mengqian Tang & Yangli Guo & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Dynamic Linkage between Aging, Mechanizations and Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Production," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Alkire, Sabina & Santos, Maria Emma, 2014. "Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 251-274.
    10. Wei Wang & Xin Luo & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "Can Land Transfer Alleviate the Poverty of the Elderly? Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Di Guo & Kun Jiang & Chenggang Xu & Xiyi Yang, 2020. "Clustering, growth and inequality in China [Reversal of fortune: geography and institutions in the making of the modem world income distribution]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1207-1239.
    12. Hongkai Qie & Yudie Chao & Hui Chen & Fan Zhang, 2023. "Do geographical indications of agricultural products promote county-level economic growth?," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 666-681, June.
    13. Sihui Zhang & Yong Sun & Xuzhou Yu & Yafeng Zhang, 2023. "Geographical Indication, Agricultural Products Export and Urban–Rural Income Gap," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Xi He & Aoxue Li & Junhong Li & Youbo Zhuang, 2022. "Conservation and Development: Spatial Identification of Relative Poverty Areas Affected by Protected Areas in China and Its Spatiotemporal Evolutionary Characteristics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Yubing Xu & Cuixia Li & Jing Wang, 2023. "How does agricultural global value chain affect ecological footprint? The moderating role of environmental regulation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2416-2427, August.
    16. Imran Ali Baig & Muhammad Irfan & Mohammad Aarif & Shah Husain & Mohammad Sulaiman, 2023. "How agricultural technologies and climatic factors affect India's crop production? A roadmap towards sustainable agriculture," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2908-2928, August.
    17. Jiake Li & Wei Wang & Meng Li & Qiao Li & Zeming Liu & Wei Chen & Yanan Wang, 2022. "Impact of Land Management Scale on the Carbon Emissions of the Planting Industry in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Picard, Pierre M. & Zeng, Dao-Zhi, 2005. "Agricultural sector and industrial agglomeration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 75-106, June.
    19. Yujing Huang, 2022. "The Impact of Government Official Assessment on Ecological Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Mara Giua & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro, 2022. "Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 381-393, March.
    21. Pradyot Ranjan Jena & Chuthaporn Ngokkuen & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Ulrike Grote, 2015. "Geographical indication protection and rural livelihoods: insights from India and Thailand," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 29(1), pages 174-185, May.
    22. Tim Josling, 2006. "The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 337-363, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunyan Li & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Weina Hu & Qi Ban, 2023. "Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Muhammad Zubair Chishti & Arshian Sharif & Qi Xu & Gagan Deep Sharma, 2024. "Toward sustainable development: Revealing the dynamic impacts of the belt and road initiative on energy transition," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7069-7095, December.
    4. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Kuang, Xianhua & Klein, Tony, 2024. "Does the urban–rural income gap matter for rural energy poverty?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    5. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Klein, Tony & Sheenan, Lisa, 2024. "Does the low-carbon pilot cities policy make a difference to the carbon intensity reduction?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 227-239.
    6. Ivana Radić & Clara Monaco & Claire Cerdan & Iuri Peri, 2023. "Establishing Communities of Value for Sustainable Localized Food Products: The Case of Mediterranean Olive Oil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Hasan, Morshadul & Hoque, Ariful & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Gasbarro, Dominic, 2024. "FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human- and machine-generated processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    8. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Wei Jia & Zhihao Wang & Lei Liu, 2025. "Digital Inclusive Finance and Carbon Emission Efficiency: Evidence from China’s Economic Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2018. "Un?alternativa alla retorica della dimensione aziendale e degli IDE: sistemi agro-alimentari sostenibili di PMI ed internazionalizzazione endogena per mezzo delle indicazioni geografiche," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 27-42.
    11. Liang, Shuzhen & Ye, Yongwei & Yun, Feng, 2024. "Social credit system construction and entrepreneurial activity: A quasi-natural experiment from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Xusen Zhu & Chaofu Wei & Fengtai Zhang & Junyi Zhang & Yuedong Xiao & Xingyu Yang, 2022. "Influencing Factors of Farmers’ Land Circulation in Mountainous Chongqing in China Based on A Multi-Class Logistic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Mu, Weiwei & Liu, Kefu & Tao, Yunqing & Ye, Yongwei, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Boga, Rubén & Paül, Valerià, 2023. "‘Because of its size, it’s not worth it!’: The viability of small-scale geographical indication schemes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Bie, Fan & Yang, Yifan & Shen, Hebin & Zhao, Qi, 2024. "Inclusive digital economy, resource dependence and changes in the urban energy mix: City level analysis from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Aimin Zhang & Moses Nanyun Nankpan & Bo Zhou & Joseph Ato Forson & Edmund Nana Kwame Nkrumah & Samuel Evergreen Adjavon, 2024. "A COP28 Perspective: Does Chinese Investment and Fintech Help to Achieve the SDGs of African Economies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    18. Chunyan Li & Qi Ban & Lanqing Ge & Liwen Qi & Chenchen Fan, 2024. "The Relationship between Geographical Indication Products and Farmers’ Incomes Based on Meta-Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Mara Giua & Luca Salvatici & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro & Roberto Solazzo, 2025. "Do Territories with Geographical Indications Trade Better?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 31-64, March.
    20. Xiuli Liu & Jing Cui & Yanrui Wu & Xiaohang Yue & Jun Shen & Pibin Guo, 2024. "The Nexus between Green Finance and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Maturity Mismatch in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5764-5780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.