IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p378-d1058197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographical Indication, Agricultural Products Export and Urban–Rural Income Gap

Author

Listed:
  • Sihui Zhang

    (School of Management, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yong Sun

    (School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Institute of Rural Revitalization, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xuzhou Yu

    (School of Management, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yafeng Zhang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

Abstract

The Nineteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the implementation of a rural revitalization strategy, which is an important way to achieve common prosperity for all the people, as promoting farmers’ income increase and narrowing the urban–rural income gap are key to promoting rural revitalization and common prosperity. So, under the background of vigorously promoting the rural revitalization strategy in China, it is very important to explore the effect and realization mechanism of geographical indication (GI) on reducing the urban–rural income gap. Based on the statistical data of 31 provinces in China from 2008 to 2019, this empirical study uses the spatial Durbin model (SDM) to analyze the relationship between GI and urban–rural income gap, and the stepwise regression method is used to explore the mediating effect of agricultural product exports on it. The results show that: (1) The potential economic value of GI branding can reduce the urban–rural income gap, and each additional unit of GI in this region will reduce the urban–rural income difference of this region by 0.160 units, and the urban–rural income difference of neighboring regions by 0.133 units. The result is still consistent after changing the proxy variable of urban–rural income gap for robustness test; (2) The brand effect of GI can form a stronger competitive advantage in foreign trade and promote the export level of agricultural products; (3) GI can narrow the urban–rural income gap through the export of agricultural products, and agricultural product export plays an important mediating effect. In the future, the government should not only strengthen the management and protection of GI but also actively market GI products. Promoting the international mutual recognition and mutual protection of GI can ensure the agricultural product export of GI and improve the foreign trade level of GI.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihui Zhang & Yong Sun & Xuzhou Yu & Yafeng Zhang, 2023. "Geographical Indication, Agricultural Products Export and Urban–Rural Income Gap," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:378-:d:1058197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guanghua Wan & Ming Lu & Zhao Chen, 2007. "Globalization And Regional Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence From Within China," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 53(1), pages 35-59, March.
    2. Feng, Shujie, 2020. "Geographical Indications: Can China Reconcile the Irreconcilable Intellectual Property Issue between EU and US?," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 424-445, July.
    3. Yari Vecchio & Abdul-Latif Iddrisu & Felice Adinolfi & Marcello De Rosa, 2020. "Geographical Indication to Build up Resilient Rural Economies: A Case Study from Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Riccardo Crescenzi & Fabrizio De Filippis & Mara Giua & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro, 2022. "Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 381-393, March.
    5. Agostino, Mariarosaria & Trivieri, Francesco, 2014. "Geographical indication and wine exports. An empirical investigation considering the major European producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 22-36.
    6. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim Nikolaevich Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2018. "Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2111-2132, September.
    7. Ransom, J. K. & Paudyal, K. & Adhikari, K., 2003. "Adoption of improved maize varieties in the hills of Nepal," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 299-305, December.
    8. Xi He, 2020. "US agricultural exports and labor market adjustments," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 609-621, July.
    9. Diandian Chen & Yong Ma, 2022. "Effect of industrial structure on urban–rural income inequality in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 547-566, February.
    10. Barbara Pick & Delphine Marie-Vivien, 2021. "Representativeness in Geographical Indications: A Comparison between the State-Driven and Producer-Driven Systems in Vietnam and France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Guohua Yu & Zheng Lu, 2021. "Rural credit input, labor transfer and urban–rural income gap: evidence from China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 872-893, June.
    12. van Berkum, Siemen & van Meijl, Hans, 2000. "The application of trade and growth theories to agriculture: a survey," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(4), pages 1-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyan Li & Jianmei Gao & Lanqing Ge & Weina Hu & Qi Ban, 2023. "Do Geographical Indication Products Promote the Growth of the Agricultural Economy? An Empirical Study Based on Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Xingling Jiang & Yong Sun & Mou Shen & Lixia Tang, 2024. "How Does Developing Green Agriculture Affect Poverty? Evidence from China’s Prefecture-Level Cities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Xiaoyu Yin & Jia Li & Jingyi Wu & Ruihan Cao & Siqian Xin & Jianxu Liu, 2024. "Impacts of Geographical Indications on Agricultural Growth and Farmers’ Income in Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingling Li & Yingzi Chen & Haoran Gao & Changjian Li, 2023. "How to Regulate the Infringements of Geographical Indications of Agricultural Products—An Empirical Study on Judicial Documents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-31, March.
    2. Xiao Yan & Saidatulakmal Mohd, 2023. "Trends and Causes of Regional Income Inequality in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2023. "Taste of home: Birth town bias in Geographical Indications," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp23089, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    4. Li, Linfei & Khan, Sufyan Ullah & Guo, Chenhao & Huang, Yanfen & Xia, Xianli, 2022. "Non-agricultural labor transfer, factor allocation and farmland yield: Evidence from the part-time peasants in Loess Plateau region of Northwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Christopher Candelaria & Mary C. Daly & Galina Hale, 2009. "Beyond Kuznets: persistent regional inequality in China," Working Paper Series 2009-07, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    7. Jing Li & Tsun Se Cheong & Jianfa Shen & Dahai Fu, 2019. "Urbanization And Rural–Urban Consumption Disparity: Evidence From China," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(04), pages 983-996, September.
    8. Jo H.M. Wijnands & Harry J. Bremmers & Bernd M.J. van der Meulen & Krijn J. Poppe, 2011. "Food Legislation and Competitiveness in the EU Food Industry," Chapters, in: Emiel F.M. Wubben (ed.), Institutions and Regulation for Economic Growth?, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Yuwan Duan & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los & Ruochen Dai, 2023. "Regional inequality in China during its rise as a giant exporter: A value chain analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 148-172, January.
    10. Francisco J. Castellano-Álvarez & Ana Nieto Masot & José Castro-Serrano, 2020. "Intangibles of Rural Development. The Case Study of La Vera (Extremadura, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Kazuhiro Kumo & Alexandra Koval & Irina Korgun & Olga Trofimenko, 2018. "Foreign Trade and Regional Inequality:The Case of the Russian Federation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 884-895.
    13. Xuejun Liu & Albert Park & Yaohui Zhao, 2010. "Explaining Rising Returns to Education in Urban China in the 1990s," Trade Working Papers 22720, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. McLeod, Elizabeth & Jensen, Kimberly & Griffith, Andrew & Lewis, Karen, 2017. "Tennessee Beef Producers' Willingness to Participate in a Tennessee Branded Beef Program," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252649, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    16. Mario Fernández-Zarza & Santiago Amaya-Corchuelo & Giovanni Belletti & Encarnación Aguilar-Criado, 2021. "Trust and Food Quality in the Valorisation of Geographical Indication Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Zhiming Cheng, 2011. "From planned to market economy: The rise and fall of the City of Textiles, Xi’an," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(5), pages 348-362, August.
    18. Sanzidur Rahman & Aree Wiboonpongse & Songsak Sriboonchitta & Yaovarate Chaovanapoonphol, 2009. "Production Efficiency of Jasmine Rice Producers in Northern and North‐eastern Thailand," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 419-435, June.
    19. Ming Lu & Shiqing Jiang, 2008. "Labor Market Reform, Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 16(6), pages 63-80, November.
    20. GOH, Chor-ching & LUO, Xubei & ZHU, Nong, 2009. "Income growth, inequality and poverty reduction: A case study of eight provinces in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 485-496, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:378-:d:1058197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.