IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v44y2023i8p4482-4506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fee or subsidy? Pricing strategies for digital content platforms with different content and advertising

Author

Listed:
  • Peipei Li
  • Shue Mei
  • Weijun Zhong

Abstract

The practice of offering basic and premium services with different content and advertising on digital content platforms has gained popularity. The challenge of balancing subscription fees and advertising fees to maximize revenue has led some platforms to charge consumers for the basic service, while others subsidize it. Therefore, this study aims to examine whether consumers should be charged or subsidized for the basic service, which includes lower‐quality content and advertisements. By utilizing an optimization model, we discover that when there is a significant surplus of advertising or a slight surplus of advertising with a minimal profit to advertisers, the platform should charge. However, when the surplus of advertising is low and the profit to advertisers is high, the platform should subsidize. Furthermore, under partial market coverage, when the surplus of advertising is low and the profit to advertisers is moderate, the platform should initially charge and then subsidize as the content quality difference increases. Surprisingly, the intuition that the pricing of the basic service and advertising should decrease with the nuisance of advertising and increase with the surplus of advertising may not always hold true. This study led to a novel approach to exploring differentiated pricing for digital content platforms, taking into account the advertising information value from a bilateral market perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Peipei Li & Shue Mei & Weijun Zhong, 2023. "Fee or subsidy? Pricing strategies for digital content platforms with different content and advertising," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 4482-4506, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:8:p:4482-4506
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claude Crampes & Carole Haritchabalet & Bruno Jullien, 2009. "Advertising, Competition And Entry In Media Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 7-31, March.
    2. Kristina Brecko, 2023. "New Features Free of Charge? Intertemporal Product Versions and Pricing in the Software Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 61-86, January.
    3. Xueqi (David) Wei & Barrie R. Nault, 2014. "Monopoly Versioning of Information Goods When Consumers Have Group Tastes," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 1067-1081, June.
    4. Hans Jarle Kind & Tore Nilssen & Lars Sørgard, 2009. "Business Models for Media Firms: Does Competition Matter for How They Raise Revenue?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1112-1128, 11-12.
    5. Ying-Ju Chen & Sridhar Seshadri, 2007. "Product Development and Pricing Strategy for Information Goods Under Heterogeneous Outside Opportunities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 150-172, June.
    6. Tåg, Joacim, 2009. "Paying to remove advertisements," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 245-252, November.
    7. Dietl, Helmut & Lang, Markus & Lin, Panlang, 2013. "Advertising pricing models in media markets: Lump-sum versus per-consumer charges," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 257-271.
    8. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2005. "Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(4), pages 947-972.
    9. Kumar, Subodha & Sethi, Suresh P., 2009. "Dynamic pricing and advertising for web content providers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(3), pages 924-944, September.
    10. Roy Jones & Haim Mendelson, 2011. "Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 164-176, January.
    11. David Godes & Elie Ofek & Miklos Sarvary, 2009. "Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 20-35, 01-02.
    12. Dimakopoulos, Philipp & Sudaric, Slobodan, 2018. "Privacy and Platform Competition," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 67, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    13. Dimakopoulos, Philipp D. & Sudaric, Slobodan, 2018. "Privacy and platform competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 686-713.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zennyo, Yusuke, 2020. "Freemium competition among ad-sponsored platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Attila Ambrus & Emilio Calvano & Markus Reisinger, 2016. "Either or Both Competition: A "Two-Sided" Theory of Advertising with Overlapping Viewerships," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 189-222, August.
    3. Stühmeier Torben & Wenzel Tobias, 2012. "Regulating Advertising in the Presence of Public Service Broadcasting," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Dietl, Helmut & Lang, Markus & Lin, Panlang, 2013. "Advertising pricing models in media markets: Lump-sum versus per-consumer charges," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 257-271.
    5. Reisinger, Markus, 2012. "Platform competition for advertisers and users in media markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 243-252.
    6. Charles Angelucci & Julia Cagé, 2019. "Newspapers in Times of Low Advertising Revenues," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 319-364, August.
    7. Simon P. Anderson & Joshua S. Gans, 2011. "Platform Siphoning: Ad-Avoidance and Media Content," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 1-34, November.
    8. Shivendu Shivendu & Zhe (James) Zhang, 2015. "Versioning in the Software Industry: Heterogeneous Disutility from Underprovisioning of Functionality," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 731-753, December.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4edekc99or8n2bu86nu4ua8adl is not listed on IDEAS
    10. E. Carroni & D. Paolini, 2019. "The business model of a streaming platform," Working Paper CRENoS 201902, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    11. Song Lin, 2020. "Two-Sided Price Discrimination by Media Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(2), pages 317-338, March.
    12. Xingzhen Zhu & Markus Lang & Helmut Dietl, 2022. "Content Quality Assurance on Media Platforms with User-Generated Content," Working Papers 395, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    13. Anderson, Simon & Kind, Hans Jarle & Foros, Øystein, 2012. "Product quality, competition, and multi-purchasing," CEPR Discussion Papers 8923, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Emilio Calvano & Michele Polo, 2020. "Strategic Differentiation by Business Models: Free-To-Air and Pay-TV," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(625), pages 50-64.
    15. Wenyi Wang & Qiang Guo, 2023. "Subscription strategy choices of network video platforms in the presence of social influence," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 577-604, March.
    16. Chutian Wang & Bo Zhou & Yogesh V. Joshi, 2024. "Endogenous Consumption and Metered Paywalls," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 158-177, January.
    17. Dietl Helmut & Lang Markus & Lin Panlang, 2023. "The Effects of Introducing Advertising in Pay TV: A Model of Asymmetric Competition between Pay TV and Free TV," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 291-326, January.
    18. Simon P. Anderson & Bruno Jullien, 2015. "The advertising-financed business model in two-sided media markets," Post-Print hal-02866192, HAL.
    19. Carroni, Elias & Paolini, Dimitri, 2020. "Business models for streaming platforms: Content acquisition, advertising and users," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4edekc99or8n2bu86nu4ua8adl is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Zixuan Meng & Lin Hao & Yong Tan, 2021. "Freemium Pricing in Digital Games with Virtual Currency," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 481-496, June.
    22. Øystein Foros & Hans Jarle Kind & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2012. "Ad Pricing by Multi-Channel Platforms: How to Make Viewers and Advertisers Prefer the Same Channel?," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 133-146, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:44:y:2023:i:8:p:4482-4506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.