IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnlmpe/v2023y2023i1n6639335.html

Multiagent Game of Intelligent Building Detection and Its Harm Rumor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mingjian Yang
  • Dandan She
  • Yangming Guo

Abstract

The “14th Five‐Year” development plan of the construction industry of the Chinese government makes it clear that intelligent buildings are the general direction of future construction development. However, the occurrence of construction accidents in recent years has brought huge casualties. With the rapid development of third‐party inspection institutions, their judgment has become an important threshold for the access to smart buildings. The failure of inspection institutions to detect the renewal of leases may lead to the failure of intelligent systems, leading to the failure of construction equipment and causing major safety accidents such as the uncontrolled fall of construction elevators and the fall of tower crane items. As the supervisor of third‐party inspection institutions, government functional departments are responsible for the failure of intelligent systems. All of them undertake the important role of intelligent building security. This paper builds an evolutionary game model with government regulatory authorities, third‐party testing institutions, and intelligent construction enterprises as the three game parties, based on variables that affect the factors of the players, and discusses the possible scenarios of the stabilization strategy, which draws the following points: (1) the increase of incentives and penalties by the government is conducive to promoting the construction of high‐quality intelligent buildings and the normative behavior of the third party without intention to seek rent, but the increase of incentives will not be conducive to the government fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities. (2) The reasonable reward and punishment mechanism set by the government must meet the condition that the sum of rewards and punishments for all parties is greater than their speculative returns so as to ensure the safety of intelligent buildings in the evolving and stable market environment. (3) The accountability of the superior government for the dereliction of duty of the regulatory authorities is of great significance to enhancing the stability of enterprises in building high‐quality intelligent buildings. (4) It is also an effective way to avoid the construction of low‐quality smart buildings by improving the listed sales income of enterprises and increasing the rent‐seeking cost of enterprises. Combined with the improved SIR model, it is calculated that after the occurrence of a construction accident, when the rumor first appears, the rumor will quickly spread out of control without timely management and supervision. The conclusion of the game model provides a great reference value for the government’s regulatory behavior. The quality of the government’s regulatory behavior is directly related to the future of high‐quality development of intelligent construction and also expands the application field of evolutionary game theory and SIR theory. The government should actively manage third‐party testing institutions and intelligent building enterprises before construction accidents happen. After the accident, strict management and supervision should be carried out on well‐known bloggers before the emergence of rumors so as to reduce the possibility of standardizing individuals’ reprinting of rumors and avoid the uncontrollable negative impact in the later period, thus seriously affecting the credibility of government supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingjian Yang & Dandan She & Yangming Guo, 2023. "Multiagent Game of Intelligent Building Detection and Its Harm Rumor Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2023(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:6639335
    DOI: 10.1155/2023/6639335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6639335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2023/6639335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Hong & Chen, Feiyu & Zhu, Dandan & Qi, Hui & Long, Ruyin, 2015. "Burnout in Chinese coal mine safety supervision," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 22-31.
    2. You, Qi & Yu, Kai & Zhou, Lujie & Zhang, Jing & Lv, Maoyun & Wang, Jiansheng, 2023. "Research on risk analysis and prevention policy of coal mine workers' group behavior based on evolutionary game," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Du, Weijian & Li, Mengjie & Wang, Faming, 2020. "Role of rent-seeking or technological progress in maintaining the monopoly power of energy enterprises: An empirical analysis based on micro-data from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    4. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jinrong He & Jingru Li & Xiang Liu & Yicheng Huang & Qiong Shen, 2022. "What Is the Mechanism of Government Green Development Behavior Considering Multi-Agent Interaction? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Liu, Changyu & Song, Yadong & Wang, Wei & Shi, Xunpeng, 2023. "The governance of manufacturers’ greenwashing behaviors: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    6. Okuguchi, Koji & Yamazaki, Takeshi, 2008. "Global stability of unique Nash equilibrium in Cournot oligopoly and rent-seeking game," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1204-1211, April.
    7. Yin, Fulian & Xia, Xinyu & Zhang, Xiaojian & Zhang, Mingjia & Lv, Jiahui & Wu, Jianhong, 2021. "Modelling the dynamic emotional information propagation and guiding the public sentiment in the Chinese Sina-microblog," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 396(C).
    8. Jingna Kou & Fengjun Sun & Wei Li & Jie Jin, 2022. "Could China Declare a “Coal Phase-Out”? An Evolutionary Game and Empirical Analysis Involving the Government, Enterprises, and the Public," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Xingwei Li & Ruonan Huang & Jiachi Dai & Jingru Li & Qiong Shen, 2021. "Research on the Evolutionary Game of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) Recycling Units’ Green Behavior, Considering Remanufacturing Capability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-32, September.
    10. Wang, Delu & Li, Chunxiao & Mao, Jinqi & Yang, Qing, 2023. "What affects the implementation of the renewable portfolio standard? An analysis of the four-party evolutionary game," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 250-261.
    11. Qiyun Huang & Junwu Wang & Mengwei Ye & Shiman Zhao & Xiang Si, 2022. "A Study on the Incentive Policy of China’s Prefabricated Residential Buildings Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Changyu & Sun, Jia & Zheng, Luhang & Zhu, Renkui, 2025. "Combating the rent-seeking among enterprises in China's emissions trading system," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Du, Kang & Fan, Ruguo & Wang, Dongxue, 2025. "Coupling effects of RPS and CET policies on the low-carbon transformation of the Chinese power industry: A combined perspective based on tripartite evolutionary game and system dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    3. Rui Song & Wen Shi & Wanyi Qin & Xingjian Xue, 2023. "Exploring the interplay of new energy vehicle enterprises, consumers, and government in the context of the "dual carbon" target: An evolutionary game and simulation analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Yan, Sizhe & Wang, Weiqing & Li, Xiaozhu & Maimaiti, Pakezhati & Zhao, Yi, 2024. "Cross-regional green certificate transaction strategies based on a double-layer game model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    5. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Yinglin Wang & Leqi Chen & Jiaxin Zhuang, 2024. "Research on ESG Investment Efficiency Regulation from the Perspective of Reciprocity and Evolutionary Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1665-1695, September.
    7. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Jinrong He & Jingru Li & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2022. "Mechanism of Enterprise Green Innovation Behavior Considering Coevolution Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Li, Jingjing & Wang, Zhaoxin & Li, Hui & Jiao, Jianling, 2024. "Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    9. Yuan Qiu & Di Zhou, 2024. "De‐politicization and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3668-3684, July.
    10. Da Gao & Chang Liu & Xinyan Wei & Yang Liu, 2023. "Can River Chief System Policy Improve Enterprises’ Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2022. "Emission Reduction and Value-added Export Nexus at Firm Level," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    12. Liu, Lu & Zhao, Qiuhong & Bi, Yanlin, 2020. "Why rent-seeking behavior may exist in Chinese mining safety production inspection system and how to alleviate it: A tripartite game analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Yong Sun & Yalin Wang & Baoyin Liu & Zhongrui Sun, 2023. "Evolutionary game of destination brand co‐construction with government involvement," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2125-2136, June.
    14. Hefti, Andreas, 2016. "On the relationship between uniqueness and stability in sum-aggregative, symmetric and general differentiable games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 83-96.
    15. Yao, Xusheng & Shao, Zhiqi & Wang, Ze & Zhu, Zhu & Chen, Zuanxu & Wu, Qingyang, 2025. "Policy incentives and market mechanisms dual-driven framework for new energy vehicles promotion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    16. Lingling Xu & Tingting Tian, 2024. "Blockchain-enabled enterprise bleaching green regulation banking evolution game analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27457-27483, November.
    17. Jannesar Niri, Anahita & Poelzer, Gregory A. & Zhang, Steven E. & Rosenkranz, Jan & Pettersson, Maria & Ghorbani, Yousef, 2024. "Sustainability challenges throughout the electric vehicle battery value chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Yonghong Ma & Huili Ni & Xiaomeng Yang & Lingkai Kong & Chunmei Liu, 2023. "Government subsidies and total factor productivity of enterprises: a life cycle perspective," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(1), pages 153-188, April.
    19. Andreas M. Hefti, 2013. "Local contraction-stability and uniqueness," ECON - Working Papers 112, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    20. Ji, Xiaoqing & Liu, Shuai & Lang, Jingyi, 2022. "Assessing the impact of officials' turnover on urban economic efficiency: From the perspective of political promotion incentive and power rent-seeking incentive," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnlmpe:v:2023:y:2023:i:1:n:6639335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/2629 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.