IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ijfiec/v31y2026i2p1979-1994.html

ESG Performance, Family Ownership, and Corporate Risk‐Taking: The Moderating Role of the CSR Committee

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Adardour
  • Slimane Ed‐Dafali
  • Hicham Sbai
  • Khaled Hussainey

Abstract

In today's dynamic business landscape, the importance of ESG factors in shaping risk management strategies has gained increasing attention. Within this context, corporate governance mechanisms play a key role in enhancing the effectiveness of ESG efforts and linking them to improved risk management. This research explores the potential relationship between ESG performance and firm risk while examining the moderating effect of family ownership and CSR committees. Based on 671 firm‐year observations from 61 French listed companies in the SBF120 index over the period 2012–2022, we performed EGLS regression analysis and robustness models to reinforce the validity and reliability of our results. Our findings indicate that ESG performance has a negative and significant impact on firm risks, specifically liquidity and default risks, as measured by cash and leverage. Firms with higher ESG scores tend to exhibit lower default and liquidity risks, suggesting that strong ESG practices contribute to better financial stability. Particularly, the effect of ESG performance in reducing firm risks is stronger in non‐family firms compared to family firms. In addition, the CSR committee has a significant and positive moderating role in reinforcing the impact of ESG performance in mitigating firm risks. These results are important for both businesses and investors, as ESG performance can lead to more stable cash flows and lower corporate debt, thereby improving investors' confidence and companies' financial resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Adardour & Slimane Ed‐Dafali & Hicham Sbai & Khaled Hussainey, 2026. "ESG Performance, Family Ownership, and Corporate Risk‐Taking: The Moderating Role of the CSR Committee," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1979-1994, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:1979-1994
    DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.70026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ijfe.70026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Rodrigue & Michel Magnan & Charles Cho, 2013. "Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 107-129, April.
    2. Kofi Mintah Oware & Harshitha Moulya & Thathaiah Mallikarjunappa, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility assurance, board characteristics and social performance disclosure. Evidence of listed firms in India," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1707-1721, April.
    3. Syed Hassan Jamil & Majid Jamal Khan, 2024. "Do corporate environmental protection efforts reduce firm‐level operating risk? Evidence from a developing country," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4480-4492, July.
    4. Paola Fandella & Bruno S. Sergi & Emiliano Sironi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility performance and the cost of capital in BRICS countries. The problem of selectivity using environmental, social and governance scores," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1712-1722, July.
    5. Minghui Yang & Yan Wang & Lu Bai & Petra Maresova, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility, family involvement, and stock price crash risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1204-1225, May.
    6. Liu, Bing & Zhang, Xiangmeng, 2024. "The impact of ESG and executive structure on the default risk of family businesses: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Ma, Liangbo, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility reporting in family firms: Evidence from China," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    8. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    9. Anwer, Zaheer & Goodell, John W. & Migliavacca, Milena & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "Does ESG impact systemic risk? Evidencing an inverted U-shape relationship for major energy firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 10-25.
    10. Jerry Hausman, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    11. Boubakri, Narjess & Cosset, Jean-Claude & Saffar, Walid, 2013. "The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 641-658.
    12. Ahmed Al‐Hadi & Bikram Chatterjee & Ali Yaftian & Grantley Taylor & Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility performance, financial distress and firm life cycle: evidence from Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(2), pages 961-989, June.
    13. Bradford Cornell, 2021. "ESG preferences, risk and return," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(1), pages 12-19, January.
    14. Jooh Lee & Kyungyeon (Rachel) Koh, 2024. "ESG performance and firm risk in the U.S. financial firms," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 328-344, July.
    15. Stefano Piserà & Luca Gandullia & Claudia Girardone, 2025. "Do responsible practices lead to higher firm productivity? Evidence from Europe," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 2186-2214, July.
    16. Mithilesh Gidage & Shilpa Bhide & Rajesh Pahurkar & Ashutosh Kolte, 2024. "ESG Performance and Systemic Risk Nexus: Role of Firm-Specific Factors in Indian Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, August.
    17. Gregor Dorfleitner & Johannes Grebler, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and systematic risk: international evidence," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(1), pages 85-120, January.
    18. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & María D. Odriozola, 2019. "CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Monferrà, Stefano & Mustilli, Mario, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    20. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Huda Khan & Nadia Zahoor & Shlomo Y. Tarba, 2025. "Value Creating Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies of Family and Non-Family Firms: An Interventionist Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 161-201, November.
    21. Bayelign Abebe Zelalem & Ayalew Ali Abebe & Sitotaw Wodajo Bezabih, 2022. "Corporate governance and financial performance in the emerging economy: The case of Ethiopian insurance companies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2117117-211, December.
    22. Wajdi Affes & Anis Jarboui, 2023. "The impact of corporate governance on financial performance: a cross-sector study," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 374-394, December.
    23. Muttanachai Suttipun, 2023. "ESG Performance and Corporate Financial Risk of the Alternative Capital Market in Thailand," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2168290-216, December.
    24. Xiao Li & Gang Liu & Qinghua Fu & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Abdelrhman Meero & Muhammad Safdar Sial, 2022. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    25. Isabel Abinzano & Pilar Corredor & Beatriz Martinez, 2021. "Does family ownership always reduce default risk?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4025-4060, September.
    26. Noor Muhammad & Frank Scrimgeour & Krishna Reddy & Sazali Abidin, 2015. "The Impact of Corporate Environmental Performance on Market Risk: The Australian Industry Case," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 347-362, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    2. Ali Uyar & Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Cemil Kuzey & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2022. "Do shareholders reward or punish risky firms due to CSR reporting and assurance?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1596-1620, July.
    3. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1655-1670, December.
    4. Changjun Zheng & Md. Abdul Mannan Khan & Mohammad Morshedur Rahman & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Md. Shahinur Rahman, 2025. "ESG Performance and Financial Stability: A Bibliometric and Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    5. Vincenzo Basile & Luana Serino & Antonello D’ Ambra & Francesco Campanella, 2026. "Board characteristics and effects on ESG performance: empirical evidence from the European banking system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 2121-2138, February.
    6. Michel Krah & Michael Kouadio & Fabrice Anzara, 2026. "Public debt and economic growth in WAEMU countries: evidence on the moderating effect of governance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Meghamrita Chakraborty, 2023. "Linking Migration, Diversity and Regional Development in India," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(1), pages 55-72, January.
    8. Hany Eldemerdash & Hugh Metcalf & Sara Maioli, 2014. "Twin deficits: new evidence from a developing (oil vs. non-oil) countries’ perspective," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 825-851, November.
    9. Huy Quang Doan, 2019. "Trade, Institutional Quality and Income: Empirical Evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Skoufias, Emmanuel, 1998. "Determinants of child health during the economic transition in Romania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 2045-2056, November.
    11. González, Maximiliano & Guzmán, Alexander & Pombo, Carlos & Trujillo, María Andréa, 2012. "Family involvement and dividend policy in listed and non-listed firms," Galeras. Working Papers Series 034, Universidad de Los Andes. Facultad de Administración. School of Management.
    12. McGovern, Mark E. & Rokicki, Slawa & Reichman, Nancy E., 2022. "Maternal depression and economic well-being: A quasi-experimental approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    13. A. Mahabbati & A. Izady & M. Mousavi Baygi & K. Davary & S. M. Hasheminia, 2017. "Daily soil temperature modeling using ‘panel-data’ concept," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1385-1401, June.
    14. Vassilis Tselios, 2008. "Income and educational inequalities in the regions of the European Union: Geographical spillovers under welfare state restrictions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 87(3), pages 403-430, August.
    15. Michele FRATIANNI & Chang HOON HO, 2007. "On the Relationship Between RTA Expansion and Openness," Working Papers 288, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    16. Massimo Postiglione & Cristian Carini & Alberto Falini, 2024. "ESG and firm value: A hybrid literature review on cost of capital implications from Scopus database," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 6457-6480, November.
    17. Mendieta-Aragón, Adrián & Rodríguez-Fernández, Laura & Navío-Marco, Julio, 2025. "Tourism usage of digital collaborative economy platforms in Europe: Situation, behaviours, and implications for the digital policies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    18. Wilman-Santiago Ochoa-Moreno & Byron Alejandro Quito & Carlos Andrés Moreno-Hurtado, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Quality: Revisiting the EKC in Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Raffaela Casciello & Rosalinda Santonastaso & Martina Prisco & Ilaria Martino, 2024. "Green innovation and financial performance. The role of R&D investments and ESG disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5372-5390, November.
    20. Pardo Martínez, Clara Inés & Silveira, Semida, 2012. "Analysis of energy use and CO2 emission in service industries: Evidence from Sweden," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5285-5294.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ijfiec:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:1979-1994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1076-9307/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.