IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaeuco/v24y2018i1p63-79n4.html

25 Years of Rural Development in post-Soviet Central Asia: Sustaining Inequalities

Author

Listed:
  • Spoor Max

Abstract

To show that post-Soviet rural development in Central Asia has been confronted with sustained inequalities, three particular factors are analysed in this paper have being viewed as fundamental in influencing national and rural development. Firstly, most countries have based their growth models on economic nationalism (not only creating borders and national institutions, but also choosing inward-looking strategies), while leaning one-sidedly on their natural resource wealth (carbohydrates such as oil, natural gas and minerals, but also industrial crops like cotton). Secondly, and related to the first explanatory factor, the region has been struck by hidden and open resource-based conflicts, in particular on land and water. Inter-state tensions have emerged, in particular between downstream (irrigation water dependent) countries, such as Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, and the upstream (hydropower energy dependent, and carbohydrate-poor) ones, such as Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Thirdly, all the countries analysed here have followed a rather unequal capital city-centric growth model, using the proceeds of exports of mineral wealth (or cotton) for rapid urbanisation with little or no investment in rural development, resulting in a growing urban-rural divide and increasing rural-urban and cross-border migration. While it is recognised that this region is indeed a bridge between West and East (also re-emphasised by the Chinese ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative), it is argued in this paper that there is a need to reduce these inequalities and unbalanced growth, being that they will be an obstacle to the sustainable growth and development of rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Spoor Max, 2018. "25 Years of Rural Development in post-Soviet Central Asia: Sustaining Inequalities," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 24(1), pages 63-79, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:63-79:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/eec-2018-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2018-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eec-2018-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macours, Karen & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2008. "Rural-Urban Poverty Differences in Transition Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2170-2187, November.
    2. Max Spoor & Luca Tasciotti & Mihail Peleah, 2014. "Quality of life and social exclusion in rural Southern, Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 201-219, June.
    3. Max Spoor, 1997. "Upheaval Along The Silk Route: The Dynamics Of Economic Transition In Central Asia," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 579-587.
    4. Franziska Gassmann, 2011. "Protecting Vulnerable Families in Central Asia: Poverty, vulnerability and the impact of the economic crisis," Papers inwopa639, Innocenti Working Papers.
    5. Pomfret, Richard, 2012. "Resource management and transition in Central Asia, Azerbaijan and Mongolia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 146-156.
    6. Swinnen, Johan F.M. & Rozelle, Scott, 2006. "From Marx and Mao to the Market: The Economics and Politics of Agricultural Transition," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199288915.
    7. Spoor, M.N., 1995. "Agrarian transition in former Soviet Central Asia : a comparative study of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18971, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    8. Nora Dudwick & Karin Fock & David Sedik, 2007. "Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Transition Countries : The Experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6685, April.
    9. Nodir Djanibekov & Kristof van Assche & Ihtiyor Bobojonov & John Lamers, 2012. "Farm Restructuring and Land Consolidation in Uzbekistan: New Farms with Old Barriers," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(6), pages 1101-1126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Synowiec, 2021. "Infrastructural and Social Aspects of ICT Dissemination in Rural Areas in Ukraine in Juxtaposition with Other Post-Transition Countries—State of Play and Prospects for Rural Development," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofman, Irna & Visser, Oane, 2014. "Geographies of transition: The political and geographical factors of agrarian change in Tajikistan," IAMO Discussion Papers 199945, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Hofman, Irna & Visser, Oane, 2014. "Geographies of transition: The political and geographical factors of agrarian change in Tajikistan [Geographien der Transformation: Die politischen und geographischen Faktoren der Landreform in Tadschikistan]," IAMO Discussion Papers 151, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    3. Petrick, Martin (Петрик, Мартин), 2022. "Post-Soviet transformation of agriculture: A success after all? [Постсоветская Трансформация Сельского Хозяйства: И Все-Таки Успех?]," Russian Peasant Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 7, pages 103-130.
    4. Petrick, Martin & Wandel, Jürgen & Karsten, Katharina, 2013. "Rediscovering the Virgin Lands: Agricultural Investment and Rural Livelihoods in a Eurasian Frontier Area," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 164-179.
    5. Spoor, M.N., 1999. "Agrarian transition in former Soviet Central Asia : a comparative study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19043, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    6. Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Post-Soviet agricultural restructuring: A success story after all?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 623-647.
    7. Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2009. "Reforms, globalization, and endogenous agricultural structures," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(s1), pages 719-732, November.
    8. Van Landeghem, Bert & Swinnen, Johan F.M. & Vranken, Liesbet, 2008. "Land and Happiness: Land Distribution and Subjective Well-Being in Moldova," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44375, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Varga, Mihai, 2020. "Poverty reduction through land transfers? The World Bank’s titling reforms and the making of “subsistence” agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    10. Petrick, Martin, 2013. "Competition for land and labour among individual farms and agricultural enterprises: Evidence from Kazakhstan's grain region [Der Wettbewerb zwischen Einzelbetrieben und Agrarunternehmen um Boden und Arbeit: Einsichten aus Kasachstans Getreideregi," IAMO Discussion Papers 141, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    11. Istvan Feher & Andrew Fieldsend, 2019. "The potential for expanding wheat production and exports in Kazakhstan," JRC Research Reports JRC113009, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Johan Swinnen & Kym Anderson, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6502, April.
    13. Swinnen, J.F.M. & Maertens, M., . "From Public to Private Governance in Agri-food Supply Chains of Transition and Developing Countries," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 42.
    14. Bhaduri, Anik & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2015. "Adoption of Water-Efficient Technology: Role of Water Price Flexibility, Tenure Uncerntainty and Production Targets in Uzbekistan," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211336, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Alessandro Olper & Jan Fałkowski & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "Political Reforms and Public Policy: Evidence from Agricultural and Food Policies," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 21-47.
    16. Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "Untangling the nexus between marketization, crop diversity, farmers' wealth and nutrition: The case of Uzbekistan," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1489-1506, March.
    17. Mylène Gaulard, 2014. "Les dangers de la bulle immobilière chinoise," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 77-96.
    18. Zafar Kurbanov & Nodir Djanibekov & Thomas Herzfeld, 2025. "Land Property Rights and Investment Incentives in Movable Farm Assets: Evidence from Post-Soviet Central Asia," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 67(2), pages 396-425, June.
    19. Rustamova, Iroda & Primov, Abdulla & Karimov, Aziz & Khaitov, Botir & Karimov, Akmal, 2023. "Crop Diversification in the Aral Sea Region: Long-Term Situation Analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(13).
    20. Petrick, Martin & Oshakbaev, Dauren & Wandel, Jürgen, 2014. "Kazakhstan's wheat, beef and dairy sectors: An assessment of their development constraints and recent policy responses," IAMO Discussion Papers 163932, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:63-79:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.