IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v13y2001i4p405-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wage-setting under Fordism: The rise of job evaluation and the ideology of equal pay

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Figart

Abstract

The use of job evaluation techniques during the Fordist period has been relatively neglected by political economists. Widely adopted in the 1940s by the large manufacturing firms that constituted the dynamic sector of industry, job evaluation helped to restructure relations between management and labor. As mass production replaced craft production, employers sought to pay their workers on the basis of 'deskilled' job content. Job evaluation was also a not-so-subtle repudiation of bargaining power, determining 'the rate for the job' on the basis of internal hierarchies and market wage surveys rather than collective negotiations. However, the practice of job evaluation also rested on a theory of wage determination that set wages according to the principle of equal pay for equal work. That is, wages were based on the attributes of the job rather than the individual incumbent. The process of reconciling equal pay as ideology with preexisting gender wage disparities resulted in a narrow definition of equal work.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Figart, 2001. "Wage-setting under Fordism: The rise of job evaluation and the ideology of equal pay," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 405-425.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:13:y:2001:i:4:p:405-425
    DOI: 10.1080/0953825012009935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0953825012009935
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0953825012009935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatsuo Naruse, 1991. "Taylorism and Fordism in Japan," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 32-48, September.
    2. Asa Lofstrom, 1999. "Can job evaluation improve women's wages?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1053-1060.
    3. Mattila, J. Peter & Orazem, Peter & Weikum, Sherry K., 1992. "Comparable Worth and Factor Point Pay Analysis in State Government," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10840, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Phillip Anthony O’Hara, 1994. "An Institutionalist Review of Long Wave Theories: Schumpeterian Innovation, Modes of Regulation, and Social Structures of Accumulation," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 489-500, June.
    5. Fairris, D., 1988. "Shopfloor Relations In The Postwar Capital-Labor Accord," Department of Economics Working Papers 128, Department of Economics, Williams College.
    6. Heather Boushey & Steven Pressman, 1997. "The Economic Contributions of David M. Gordon," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 225-245.
    7. Bob Jessop, 2002. "Critical forum," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 249-250, April.
    8. Marlene Kim, 2000. "Employers' Estimates of Market Wages: Implications for Wage Discrimination in the U.S," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 97-114.
    9. Deborah M. Figart, 2000. "Equal Pay for Equal Work: The Role of Job Evaluation in an Evolving Social Norm," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnaldo Camuffo, 2002. "The Changing Nature of Internal Labor Markets," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 6(4), pages 281-294, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruce Pietrykowski, 2017. "Revaluing Low-Wage Work," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 5-29, March.
    2. Ina Krause, 2019. "Coworking Spaces: Windows to the Future of Work? Changes in the Organizational Model of Work and the Attitudes of the Younger Generation," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 52-60.
    3. John Forth & Nikolaos Theodoropoulos & Alex Bryson, 2023. "The role of the workplace in ethnic wage differentials," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 259-290, June.
    4. Carl Mela & Praveen Kopalle, 2002. "The impact of collinearity on regression analysis: the asymmetric effect of negative and positive correlations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 667-677.
    5. Susan McGrath-Champ & Therese Jefferson, 2013. "Gender and pay equity in a global knowledge organisation," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 97-123, March.
    6. Orazem, Peter F & Vodopivec, Milan, 1995. "Winners and Losers in Transition: Returns to Education, Experience, and Gender in Slovenia," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 9(2), pages 201-230, May.
    7. Alex Kondonassis & A.G. Malliaris & Chris Paraskevopoulos, 2007. "The Future of the U.S. Dollar and its Competition with the Euro," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1-2), pages 97-110.
    8. Katherine A. Moos, 2020. "Making the Case for Equitable Growth: Comments on the 2020 David Gordon Memorial Lecture," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 610-615, December.
    9. Kimberly Christensen, 2015. "He-cession? She-cession? The Gendered Impact of the Great Recession in the United States," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 47(3), pages 368-388, September.
    10. Davide Castellani & Enzo Rullani & Antonello Zanfei, 2017. "Districts, multinationals and global/digital networks," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(4), pages 429-447, December.
    11. Castellacci, Fulvio & Grodal, Stine & Mendonca, Sandro & Wibe, Mona, 2005. "Advances and challenges in innovation studies," MPRA Paper 27519, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Ertürk, Korkut Alp & Mendieta-Muñoz, Ivan, 2018. "The changing dynamics of short-run output adjustment," MPRA Paper 87409, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Joanne D. Leck, 2002. "Making Employment Equity Programs Work for Women," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(s1), pages 85-100, May.
    14. Arne Isaksen, "undated". "Location and innovation. Geographical variations in innovative activity in Norwegian manufacturing industry," STEP Report series 199603, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy.
    15. Johan Schot & Laur Kanger, 2016. "Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality," SPRU Working Paper Series 2016-15, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    16. Romar Correa, 2010. "Regime-Changes in a Stock-Flow-Consistent Model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 8(1), pages 24-33.
    17. Bertacchini Enrico & Borrione Paola, 2009. "The city mouse and the country mouse: the geography of creativity and cultural production in Italy," EBLA Working Papers 200902, University of Turin.
    18. Martin Wrobel, 2009. "Das Konzept regionaler Cluster: zwischen Schein und Sein?," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 29(1), pages 85-103, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:13:y:2001:i:4:p:405-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.