IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Cost-benefit analysis and the European union cohesion fund: On the social cost of capital and labour

Listed author(s):
  • Massimo Florio

Florio M. (2006) Cost-benefit analysis and the European Union Cohesion Fund: on the social cost of capital and labour, Regional Studies 40, 211-224. Cost-benefit analysis is a formal regulatory requirement for the evaluation of Cohesion Fund projects. It requires the calculation of shadow prices. Observed prices in less-developed European Union regions do not reflect the social opportunity cost of labour and capital because of market failures and policy constraints. The paper discusses simple rules for the calculation of financial and economic discount rates, and of shadow wages, i.e. the opportunity costs of capital and labour, in the context of the appraisal of infrastructure projects part-financed under the Cohesion Fund. It is argued that for the 2007-13 programming period, the European Commission should adopt a unique financial discount rate of 3.5% in real terms, social discount rates of 5.5% for the Convergence regions and 3.5% for Competitiveness regions, and a region-specific shadow wage rate. Cost-benefit analysis Social discount rate Shadow wage Cohesion Fund Florio M. (2006) L'analyse cout-benefice et le Fonds de cohesion de l'UE: a propos du cou t social du capital et du travail, Regional Studies 40, 211-224. L'analyse cout-benefice est une obligation legale prealable a l'evaluation des projets assistes par le Fonds de cohesion. Elle necessite le calcul des prix virtuels. Les prix observes dans les zones de l'UE en voie de developpement ne refletent le cou t d'opportunite social, ni du travail, ni du capital, a cause de la distorsion du marche et des contraintes de politique. Cet article cherche a discuter des regles simples visant le calcul des taux d'escompte financiers et economiques, et des salaires virtuels; autrement dit les cou ts d'opportunite du capital et du travail, dans le cadre de l'evaluation des projets d'equipement finances en partie sous l'egide du Fonds de cohesion. On affirme que, pour la periode de programmation 2007-13, la Commission europeenne devrait adopter un taux d'escompte financier unique de 3,5% en termes reels, des taux d'escompte sociaux de 5,5% pour les regions de convergence et de 3,5% pour les regions de l'Objectif 'competitivite', et un taux des salaires virtuels propre a chaque zone. Analyse cout-benefice Taux d'escompte social Salaire virtuel Fonds de cohesion Florio M. (2006) Kosten-Nutzenanalyse und der Kohasionsfond der EU: Bemerkungen zu den Sozialkosten von Kapital und Arbeit, Regional Studies 40, 211-224. Kosten-Nutzenanalyse ist ein formales beho rdliches Erfordernis fur die Evaluierung von Kohasionsfondprojekten. Es bedarf der Berechnung von 'Schattenpreisen'. In weniger entwickelten EU Regionen beobachtete Preise spiegeln nicht die sozialen Opportunitatskosten von Arbeit und Kapital wider aufgrund von Marktversagen und Policybedingten Einsdrankungen. Dieser Aufsatz bespricht einfache Regeln fur die Berechnung finanzieller und wirtschaftlicher Diskontsatze und fur Schattenlohne, d.h. die Opportunitatskosten von Kapital und Arbeit im Zusammenhang mit der Einschatzung von Infrastrukturprojekten, die vom Kohasionsfond teilfinanziert werden. Es wird der Standpunkt vertreten, dass die Europaische Kommission fur die Programmperiode 2007-2013 einen einmaligen Finanzdiskontsatz von effektiv 3,5% einfuhren sollte, einen sozialen Diskontsatz von 5,5% fur “Konvergenz” Regionen und 3,5% fur “Wettbewerbs” Regionen sowie einen bestimmten regionenspezifisch zugeschnittenen Schattenlohnsatz. Kosten-Nutzenanalyse sozialer Diskontsatz Schattenlohn Kohasionsfond Florio M. (2006) Analisis coste-beneficio y el Fondo de Cohesion de la UE: sobre el coste social de capital y trabajo, Regional Studies 40, 211-224. Los analisis de costes y beneficios son un requisito formal y reglamentario para llevar a cabo la evaluacion de los proyectos del Fondo de Cohesion. Requieren el calculo de los 'precios sombra'. En los precios de las regiones de la UE menos desarrolladas no queda reflejado el coste de oportunidad social de trabajo y capital debido a fallos de mercado y restricciones poli- ticas. Aqui se exponen reglas simples para el calculo de las tasas de descuento, segun un valor financiero y economico, y los 'salarios sombra', es decir, los costes de oportunidad de capital y trabajo, en el ambito de una valoracion de proyectos de infraestructura financiado en parte por el Fondo de Cohesion. Se sostiene que para el periodo de programacion 2007-2013, la Comision Europea deberia adoptar una tasa exclusiva de descuento financiero del 3,5% en terminos reales, tasas de descuento social del 5,5% para las regiones de Convergencia, un 3,5% para las regiones de Competitividad y una tasa especifica de salario sombra para cada region. Analisis de costes y beneficios Tasa de descuento social Salario sombra Fondo de cohesion

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 211-224

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:211-224
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600600579
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:211-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.