IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why an auditor can't be competent and independent: A french case study


  • Chrystelle Richard


This research proposes an understanding of the role of the relationship between the finance director and the auditor in the audit process and its effect on audit quality. We adopt an interpretative and qualitative approach. Based on 60 interviews, this qualitative method is the object of an interpretative process, composed of two complementary theoretical fields: contractual economic theories and economic sociology. Two notions emerge from this process, which are considered as the interpretation bases: relationship dualism (professional/personal relationship) and hybrid trust. This interpretative conception leads to a redefinition of the relationship between a finance director and an auditor as a peers' relationship. The emergence conditions of a peers' relationship are the sharing of professional and cultural norms, the frequency of relationship and the multiplexity of relationship. A peers' relationship is characterised by a hybrid trust, a joint generation of knowledge and a role equality. This parity conception of a relationship leads to a new reading of the foundations of audit quality that are auditor independence and competence. Audit quality appears as a balance between its two determinants, competence and independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Chrystelle Richard, 2006. "Why an auditor can't be competent and independent: A french case study," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 153-179.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:153-179
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180500104832

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Frédéric Wacheux, 1996. "Méthodes qualitatives de recherches en gestion," Post-Print hal-00157140, HAL.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3659 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Emna Ben Saad & Cédric Lesage, 2009. "Perception De L'Indépendance De L'Auditeur : Analyse Par La Théorie D'Attribution," Post-Print halshs-00460618, HAL.
    2. Patrick Ifergan, 2011. "Interprétativisme et complexité des normes d'audit françaises," Post-Print hal-00650464, HAL.
    3. Christine Noël Le maitre & Cathy Krohmer, 2010. "L’éthique est-elle (vraiment) une compétence clef des auditeurs légaux?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie,, vol. 13(4), pages 75-100., December.
    4. Philip Law, 2008. "An empirical comparison of non-Big 4 and Big 4 auditors' perceptions of auditor independence," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(9), pages 917-934, October.
    5. repec:eee:spacre:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:115-126 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sophie Audousset-Coulier, 2009. "L'utilisation des honoraires d'audit pour mesurer la qualité de l'audit : théorie et évidence," Post-Print halshs-00460230, HAL.
    7. Alice Garcia & Olivier Herrbach, 2010. "Organisational commitment, role tension and affective states in audit firms," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(3), pages 226-239, March.
    8. Philip Law, 2010. "The influence of the types of NAS provisions and gifts hospitality on auditor independence," International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 18(2), pages 105-117, June.
    9. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13554 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3505 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Geneviève Causse & Viet Ha Vu, 2010. "La performance des cabinets d'audit légal : comparaison de points de vue," Post-Print hal-00479509, HAL.
    12. Kym Butcher & Graeme Harrison & Jill McKinnon & Philip Ross, 2011. "Auditor appointment in compulsory audit tendering," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(2), pages 104-149, September.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7609 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Fabien Cerruti & Christelle Richard, 2008. "Qualité de l'audit et Satisfaction de l'audité : Chronique d'une Innovation Ordinaire," Post-Print halshs-00522438, HAL.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:153-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.