IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Testing for contagion in US industry portfolios -- a four-factor pricing approach

Listed author(s):
  • George Milunovich
  • Antony Tan

We conduct an empirical investigation into the financial contagion hypothesis in the context of 12 US industry portfolios. Using a four-factor asset pricing model we measure contagion as the excess co-movement between idiosyncratic portfolio shocks, and test for an increase in the frequency of contagion during the 2007--2009 crisis sub-sample. We find evidence of 22 instances of financial contagion during the noncrisis sample period, and 21 such occurrences during the 2007--2009 crisis period, at the 5% level. It appears that the frequency of contagion remained steady or declined during the crisis for the industries that had a relatively high frequency of contagion prior to the crisis, but increased for those industries that had relatively few such incidences. Interestingly, the financial sector exhibited the least number of contagion instances across both crisis and noncrisis periods.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.

Volume (Year): 23 (2013)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Pages: 15-26

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:15-26
DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2012.699185
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:23:y:2013:i:1:p:15-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.