Overreaction in the NFL point spread market
A tendency for individuals to overweigh recent information and underweigh prior data has been discovered by researchers in financial markets, economic forecasting, security analysis and other areas. A study of point spread patterns in the 2264 regular season National Football League (NFL) games over the 1981-;1995 seasons was conducted to investigate the overreaction bias of bettors. Results indicated that bettors tend to overweigh outstanding positive performance when measured over the previous game, over the previous two to five games or over the previous season. In general, the more outstanding the performance, the greater the overreaction. However, bettors did not overreact to unusual negative performance over the same periods. This result is congruent with the tendency for heavy favourites to cover the point spread less than half the time over the 1969-;1995 seasons. The overreaction bias in the NFL betting market provides another example of a violation of the weak form of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 11 (2001)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAFE20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAFE20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:11:y:2001:i:5:p:497-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.