IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v142y2019i3d10.1007_s11205-018-1946-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Longitudinal Analysis Combining Measurement Issues and Implications of the Exercise

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella Sulis

    () (Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e delle Istituzioni)

  • Mariano Porcu

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e delle Istituzioni)

  • Vincenza Capursi

    (Aziendali e Statistiche)

Abstract

Multi item questionnaires are widely used to collect students’ evaluation of teaching at university. This article makes an attempt to analyse students’ evaluation on a broad perspective. Its main aim is to adjust the evaluations from a wide range of factors which jointly may influence the teaching process: academic year peculiarities, course characteristics, students’ characteristics and item dimensionality. By setting the analysis in a generalised mixed models framework a large flexibility is introduced in the measurement of the quality of university teaching in students’ perception. In that way we consider (1) the effects of potential confounding factors which are external to the process under evaluation; (2) the dependency structure across units in the same clusters; (3) the assessment of real improvement in lecturers’ performance over time and (4) the uncertainty related to the use of an overall indicator to assess the global level of quality of the teaching as it has been assessed by the students. The implications related to a misuse of the evaluation results in implementing university policies are discussed comparing point versus interval estimates and adjusted versus unadjusted indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella Sulis & Mariano Porcu & Vincenza Capursi, 2019. "On the Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Longitudinal Analysis Combining Measurement Issues and Implications of the Exercise," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 1305-1331, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:142:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1946-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-018-1946-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-018-1946-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Ark, L. Andries, 2007. "Mokken Scale Analysis in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i11).
    2. Leckie, George & Charlton, Chris, 2013. "runmlwin: A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modeling Software from within Stata," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i11).
    3. Braga, Michela & Paccagnella, Marco & Pellizzari, Michele, 2014. "Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 71-88.
    4. Harvey Goldstein & Michael J. R. Healy, 1995. "The Graphical Presentation of a Collection of Means," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 158(1), pages 175-177, January.
    5. Helen Slater & Neil M. Davies & Simon Burgess, 2012. "Do Teachers Matter? Measuring the Variation in Teacher Effectiveness in England," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 74(5), pages 629-645, October.
    6. Isabella Sulis & Vincenza Capursi, 2013. "Building up adjusted indicators of students’ evaluation of university courses using generalized item response models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 88-102, January.
    7. Michele La Rocca & Maria Lucia Parrella & Ilaria Primerano & Isabella Sulis & Maria Prosperina Vitale, 2017. "An integrated strategy for the analysis of student evaluation of teaching: from descriptive measures to explanatory models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 675-691, March.
    8. George Leckie & Harvey Goldstein, 2009. "The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(4), pages 835-851, October.
    9. Isabella Sulis & Mariano Porcu, 2017. "Handling Missing Data in Item Response Theory. Assessing the Accuracy of a Multiple Imputation Procedure Based on Latent Class Analysis," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(2), pages 327-359, July.
    10. Silvia Bacci, 2012. "Longitudinal data: different approaches in the context of item-response theory models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 2047-2065, June.
    11. David Draper & Mark Gittoes, 2004. "Statistical analysis of performance indicators in UK higher education," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(3), pages 449-474, August.
    12. Michael A McPherson & R Todd Jewell & Myungsup Kim, 2009. "What Determines Student Evaluation Scores? A Random Effects Analysis of Undergraduate Economics Classes," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 37-51.
    13. Silvia Bacci & Valeria Caviezel, 2011. "Multilevel IRT models for the university teaching evaluation," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(12), pages 2775-2791, February.
    14. Jim Taylor & Anh Ngoc Nguyen, 2006. "An Analysis of the Value Added by Secondary Schools in England: Is the Value Added Indicator of Any Value?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 68(2), pages 203-224, April.
    15. Harvey Goldstein & David J. Spiegelhalter, 1996. "League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(3), pages 385-409, May.
    16. Peter M. Fayers & David J. Hand, 2002. "Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(2), pages 233-253, June.
    17. Carla Rampichini & Leonardo Grilli & Alessandra Petrucci, 2004. "Analysis of university course evaluations: from descriptive measures to multilevel models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 13(3), pages 357-373, December.
    18. Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal & Andrew Pickles, 2004. "Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 167-190, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sulis, Isabella & Giambona, Francesca & Porcu, Mariano, 2020. "Adjusted indicators of quality and equity for monitoring the education systems over time. Insights on EU15 countries from PISA surveys," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Michele La Rocca & Maria Lucia Parrella & Ilaria Primerano & Isabella Sulis & Maria Prosperina Vitale, 2017. "An integrated strategy for the analysis of student evaluation of teaching: from descriptive measures to explanatory models," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 675-691, March.
    3. Marco Guerra & Francesca Bassi & José G. Dias, 2020. "A Multiple-Indicator Latent Growth Mixture Model to Track Courses with Low-Quality Teaching," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 361-381, January.
    4. Isabella Sulis & Mariano Porcu, 2012. "Comparing degree programs from students’ assessments: A LCRA-based adjusted composite indicator," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 21(2), pages 193-209, June.
    5. Paul Hewson & Keming Yu, 2008. "Quantile regression for binary performance indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 401-418, September.
    6. Arpino, Bruno & Varriale, Roberta, 2009. "Assessing the quality of institutions’ rankings obtained through multilevel linear regression models," MPRA Paper 19873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Luque, Mariano & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, Oscar D. & Ruiz, Ana B., 2020. "Evaluating the global efficiency of teachers through a multi-criteria approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Ali Palali & Roel van Elk & Jonneke Bolhaar & Iryna Rud, 2017. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," CPB Discussion Paper 347, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. George Leckie & Harvey Goldstein, 2009. "The limitations of using school league tables to inform school choice," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(4), pages 835-851, October.
    10. Bruno ARPINO & Roberta VARRIALE, 2010. "Assessing The Quality Of Institutions’ Rankings Obtained Through Multilevel Linear Regression Models," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 5(1(11)_Spr), pages 7-22.
    11. Anna Salomons & Maarten Goos, 2014. "Measuring Teaching Quality in Higher Education : Assessing the Problem of Selection Bias in Course Evaluations," Working Papers 14-16, Utrecht School of Economics.
    12. Galeotti, Marzio & Rubashkina, Yana & Salini, Silvia & Verdolini, Elena, 2018. "Environmental policy performance and its determinants: Application of a three-level random intercept model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 134-144.
    13. Nicholas T. Longford, 2020. "Performance assessment as an application of causal inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(4), pages 1363-1385, October.
    14. Isabella Sulis & Mariano Porcu, 2015. "Assessing Divergences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement in Italian Primary Schools: A Proposal of Adjusted Indicators of School Effectiveness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 607-634, June.
    15. Ali Palali & Roel van Elk & Jonneke Bolhaar & Iryna Rud, 2017. "Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality," CPB Discussion Paper 347.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe‐Hesketh, 2009. "Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(3), pages 659-687, June.
    17. Donghun Cho & Joonmo Cho, 2017. "Does More Accurate Knowledge of Course Grade Impact Teaching Evaluation?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 12(2), pages 224-240, Spring.
    18. Maarten Goos & Anna Salomons, 2017. "Measuring teaching quality in higher education: assessing selection bias in course evaluations," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(4), pages 341-364, June.
    19. Giorgio E. Montanari & Marco Doretti, 2019. "Ranking Nursing Homes’ Performances Through a Latent Markov Model with Fixed and Random Effects," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 307-326, November.
    20. David I. Ohlssen & Linda D. Sharples & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2007. "A hierarchical modelling framework for identifying unusual performance in health care providers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 865-890, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:142:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-018-1946-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.