IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v18y2025i3d10.1007_s12063-025-00542-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does institutionalization enhance logistics performance in international businesses? A moderated and mediated model

Author

Listed:
  • Artuğ Eren Coşkun

    (Akdeniz University)

  • Ramazan Erturgut

    (Akdeniz University)

Abstract

The performance of interdependent international companies is required to be consistently high, leading to an increase in sectoral competition. Furthermore, they are endeavoring to establish an institutional structure in order to enhance their professional and distinctive commercial procedures while also maintaining their competitive advantages. This study aims to investigate the influence of institutionalization, which holds significant organizational and operational importance, on logistics performance, a key factor in gaining a competitive edge. Specifically, it investigates the moderating role of autonomy and the mediating role of logistics agility in this relationship, providing empirical insights through a model grounded in the Dynamic Capabilities View. By addressing the gap in literature where institutionalization and logistics performance have not been studied together, this research highlights how autonomy and agility can transform the effects of institutionalization on performance outcomes. The data collected through the questionnaire were empirically tested using path analysis in structural equation modeling. Data were collected from 390 employees by visiting 108 companies in Western Mediterranean region of Türkiye. The study concludes that formalization and cultural strength positively affect logistics performance, logistics agility positively partially mediates these interactions, and autonomy has a moderating effect on the effect of cultural strength on logistics performance. The findings provide a nuanced understanding of how formalization and cultural strength can synergistically enhance logistics performance, thereby offering actionable insights for practitioners. This study also emphasizes the critical importance of fostering a supportive culture that empowers employees through autonomy, which is essential for optimizing logistics operations in dynamic environments. It is expected that the results of the research will serve as a guide for organizations seeking to improve their logistics performance through institutionalization and will contribute to future studies by filling the gap in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Artuğ Eren Coşkun & Ramazan Erturgut, 2025. "Does institutionalization enhance logistics performance in international businesses? A moderated and mediated model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1045-1066, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12063-025-00542-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-025-00542-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-025-00542-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-025-00542-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindsey Hall, Kristina K. & Qi, Ji (Miracle) & Richey, Robert Glenn & Patil, Ripinka Koli, 2022. "Collaboration, feedback, and performance: Supply chain insights from service-dominant logic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 385-397.
    2. Ahmed Hamdy, 2024. "Supply chain capabilities matter: digital transformation and green supply chain management in post-pandemic emerging economies: A case from Egypt," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 963-981, September.
    3. Carmen M. Felipe & José L. Roldán & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2017. "Impact of Organizational Culture Values on Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2002. "Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 249-273, June.
    5. Ayman Bahjat Abdallah & Omar Mohammad Rawadiah & Walaa Al-Byati & Salah Alhyari, 2021. "Supply chain integration and export performance: the mediating role of supply chain performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(7), pages 1907-1929, August.
    6. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2016. "Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1544-1549.
    7. Farwa Qureshi & Abida Ellahi & Yasir Javed & Mobashar Rehman & Hafiz Mudassir Rehman, 2023. "Empirical investigation into impact of IT adoption on supply chain agility in fast food sector in Pakistan," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2170516-217, December.
    8. R. K. A. Bhalaji & S. Bathrinath & Syed Mithun Ali & K. Koppiahraj, 2024. "Risk assessment in sustainable supply chain: theoretical and managerial implications for circular economy in emerging economies," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(10), pages 4966-4981, October.
    9. Veronica Rattini, 2023. "Worker autonomy and performance: Evidence from a real‐effort experiment," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 300-327, April.
    10. David Martin Herold & Łukasz Marzantowicz, 2024. "Neo-institutionalism in supply chain management: from supply chain susceptibility to supply chain resilience," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(8), pages 1199-1220, February.
    11. Yingjie Ju & Yue Wang & Ye Cheng & Jun Jia, 2019. "Investigating the Impact Factors of the Logistics Service Supply Chain for Sustainable Performance: Focused on Integrators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Sayan, Zafer & Sürücü, Lütfi, 2024. "The role of transformational leadership and employee productivity in logistics performance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10.
    13. Herbes, Carsten & Brummer, Vasco & Rognli, Judith & Blazejewski, Susanne & Gericke, Naomi, 2017. "Responding to policy change: New business models for renewable energy cooperatives – Barriers perceived by cooperatives’ members," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 82-95.
    14. Feifei Yang & George A Shinkle & Mirjam Goudsmit, 2022. "The complementarity of control formalization and control flexibility: The contingent effects of competitive turbulence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(4), pages 773-792, November.
    15. Guodong Ni & Xinyue Miao & Li Li & Huaikun Li & Shaobo Wang & Miaomiao Niu, 2022. "Can Professionalization Alleviate Job Burnout in Construction Workers in China? A Multivariable Mediating Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Agarwal, Ashish & Shankar, Ravi & Tiwari, M.K., 2006. "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 211-225, August.
    17. Muhammad Irfan & Mingzheng Wang & Naeem Akhtar, 2019. "Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: a dynamic capability view," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 113-128, December.
    18. Arianna Marchetti & Phanish Puranam, 2022. "Organizational cultural strength as the negative cross-entropy of mindshare: a measure based on descriptive text," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Akmal Shahzad & Bushra Zulfiqar & Mumtaz Ali & Ayaz ul Haq & Maryam Sajjad & Ahmad Raza, 2022. "Mediating role of formalization of RM methods among the perceived business risk and organization performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2024116-202, December.
    20. Yang, Jie, 2014. "Supply chain agility: Securing performance for Chinese manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 104-113.
    21. Henk W. Volberda, 1996. "Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 359-374, August.
    22. Jiyang Cheng & Gongbing Bi & Umer Shahzad, 2024. "Influence of dynamic capabilities and supply chain finance on supply chain effectiveness in environmental dynamism: a conditional process analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 307-323, March.
    23. Do, Tien Kim Thi & Van Vu, Huong, 2021. "Does formalization increase firm investment in human capital? New evidence from Vietnam," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    24. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    25. Le, Hoi Quoc & Vu, Thi Phuong Lien & Do, Vu Phuong Anh & Do, Anh Duc, 2022. "The enduring effect of formalization on firm-level corruption in Vietnam: The mediating role of internal control," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 364-373.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AlNuaimi, Bader K. & Kumar Singh, Sanjay & Ren, Shuang & Budhwar, Pawan & Vorobyev, Dmitriy, 2022. "Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 636-648.
    2. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    3. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    4. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Busso, Donatella & Yahiaoui, Dorra, 2022. "Towards agility in international high-tech SMEs: Exploring key drivers and main outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Cécile Godé, 2008. "Les Pratiques De Coordination En Environnement Volatile : Le Cas Des Forces Aeriennes Françaises En Situation Operationnelle," Post-Print hal-00293535, HAL.
    6. Sanjai Kumar Shukla & Sushil & Manoj Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 349-370, December.
    7. Xiangsheng Dou & Fizza Ishaq, 2025. "Enterprise’s Strategic Agility and Resource Allocation Choice: A Case of SMEs in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 2229-2248, March.
    8. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    9. Katherine C. Kellogg & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2006. "Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 22-44, February.
    10. Nogalski Bogdan & Niewiadomski Przemysław & Szpitter Agnieszka A., 2020. "Agility Versus Flexibility? The Perception of Business Model Maturity in Agricultural Machinery Sector Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 57-97, September.
    11. Toshihiro Wakayama, 2008. "Thematic Networks: Structuring the Organization for Strategic Fit," Working Papers EMS_2008_09, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    12. Shekarian, Mansoor & Reza Nooraie, Seyed Vahid & Parast, Mahour Mellat, 2020. "An examination of the impact of flexibility and agility on mitigating supply chain disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    13. Cherbib, Jihene & Bahri, Fadia & Berraies, Sarra & Chebbi, Hela, 2023. "Towards the co-evolution of multinationals' and local firms' global strategies in an uncertain environment: Insights from International Joint Ventures," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    14. Troise, Ciro & Corvello, Vincenzo & Ghobadian, Abby & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2022. "How can SMEs successfully navigate VUCA environment: The role of agility in the digital transformation era," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Al-Omoush, Khaled Saleh & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ulrich, Klaus, 2022. "The impact of intellectual capital on supply chain agility and collaborative knowledge creation in responding to unprecedented pandemic crises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Man Zhu & Hongyan Gao, 2021. "The antecedents of supply chain agility and their effect on business performance: an organizational strategy perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 166-176, June.
    17. Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain & Santoro, Gabriele & Khan, Jabran & Rizzato, Fabio, 2021. "Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation in the IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 389-400.
    18. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2023. "Understanding the Relationship between Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Sustainable Performance: The Role of Strategic Agility and Firm Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Hung Nguyen & George Onofrei & Norma Harrison & Dothang Truong, 2020. "The influence of cultural compatibility and product complexity on manufacturing flexibility and financial performance," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 171-184, December.
    20. Shin, Hojung & Lee, Jae-Nam & Kim, DaeSoo & Rhim, Hosun, 2015. "Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 181-196.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D2 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:18:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s12063-025-00542-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.