IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v69y2016i5p1544-1549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility

Author

Listed:
  • Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel
  • Soto-Acosta, Pedro
  • Wensley, Anthony K.P.

Abstract

Organizational agility facilitates the search and retrieval of relevant knowledge and enables businesses to apply this knowledge to develop high-quality services and products or react to the emergence of new competitors. This work develops a research model that explores the relationships among knowledge management structures, organizational agility, and firm performance. The empirical study examines these relationships using partial least squares structural equation modelling on a dataset of 112 large Spanish companies. The results of this modelling exercise support the effectiveness of a specific set and sequence of knowledge management processes and confirm not only the direct effect of knowledge application on organizational performance, but also the mediating effect of organizational agility in this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Soto-Acosta, Pedro & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2016. "Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1544-1549.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1544-1549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315004373
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gutiérrez, Jaime Ortega & Cegarra Navarro, Juan G. & Cepeda Carrión, Gabriel A. & Leal Rodríguez, Antonio L., 2015. "Linking unlearning with quality of health services through knowledge corridors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 815-822.
    2. Paul E. Bierly & Fariborz Damanpour & Michael D. Santoro, 2009. "The Application of External Knowledge: Organizational Conditions for Exploration and Exploitation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 481-509, May.
    3. Alegre, Joaquín & Sard, Maria, 2015. "When demand drops and prices rise. Tourist packages in the Balearic Islands during the economic crisis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 375-385.
    4. Robert E. Quinn & John Rohrbaugh, 1983. "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 363-377, March.
    5. Cepeda, Gabriel & Vera, Dusya, 2007. "Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 426-437, May.
    6. Wu, Lei-Yu, 2007. "Entrepreneurial resources, dynamic capabilities and start-up performance of Taiwan's high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 549-555, May.
    7. Ahmed Seleim & Omar Khalil, 2007. "Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance in the Egyptian Software Firms," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 37-66, October.
    8. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Eldridge, Stephen & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2014. "Counter-knowledge and realised absorptive capacity," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 165-176.
    9. Fosfuri, Andrea & Tribø, Josep A., 2008. "Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 173-187, April.
    10. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    11. William Q. Judge & Thomas J. Douglas, 1998. "Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 241-262, March.
    12. Liao, Chechen & Chuang, Shu-Hui & To, Pui-Lai, 2011. "How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 728-736, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    2. Burcharth, Ana Luiza Lara de Araújo & Lettl, Christopher & Ulhøi, John Parm, 2015. "Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 269-284.
    3. Rafael Sancho-Zamora & Isidro Peña-García & Santiago Gutiérrez-Broncano & Felipe Hernández-Perlines, 2021. "Moderating Effect of Proactivity on Firm Absorptive Capacity and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Firms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Wensley, Anthony K.P. & Navarro, Juan Gabriel Cegarra, 2015. "Overcoming knowledge loss through the utilization of an unlearning context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1563-1569.
    5. López, Cristina Segovia & Pérez, Manuel Sánchez, 2014. "Effects of Learning from Distributors on Manufacturers’ Exploitation and Exploration Innovation Strategies in Food and Beverages Industry," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199371, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    6. Beatriz Ortiz García Navas & Mario Javier Donate Manzanares & Fátima Guadamillas Gómez, 2017. "Capacidad de Absorción: Revisión Crítica y Proposición de un Modelo Teórico (Absorptive Capacity: Critical Review and Proposition of a Theoretical Model)," Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología (GECONTEC), vol. 5(2), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Antonio Botti & Massimiliano Vesci, 2018. "Competing Value Framework and Public Administration: Managerial Insights, Theoretical Reflections and Practical Implications from Italy," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 147-160, February.
    8. Tseng, Shu-Mei, 2012. "Correlations between external knowledge and the knowledge chain as impacting service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 429-437.
    9. Alar Kolk & Mait Rungi, 2012. "Total Exploitation Orientation in Capability Development: The Cross-case of Google, Ericsson, Microsoft and Nokia," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 4(2).
    10. Ines Karra, 2021. "Resources and green strategic intent: towards improving the competitiveness of Tunisian industrial companies," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-25, April.
    11. Wang, Yi & Chen, Yang & Benitez-Amado, Jose, 2015. "How information technology influences environmental performance: Empirical evidence from China," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 160-170.
    12. Shao, Zhen, 2019. "Interaction effect of strategic leadership behaviors and organizational culture on IS-Business strategic alignment and Enterprise Systems assimilation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 96-108.
    13. Siyuan Wang & Linglan Huang, 2022. "A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Culture and Corporate Sustainable Performance: Evidence from Chinese SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Rapp, Adam & Trainor, Kevin J. & Agnihotri, Raj, 2010. "Performance implications of customer-linking capabilities: Examining the complementary role of customer orientation and CRM technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1229-1236, November.
    15. Henri, Jean-François & Journeault, Marc, 2010. "Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 63-80, January.
    16. Martínez-Caro, Eva & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Alfonso-Ruiz, Francisco Javier, 2020. "Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Tan, Justin & Wang, Liang, 2010. "Flexibility-efficiency tradeoff and performance implications among Chinese SOEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 356-362, April.
    18. Molden, Lars Hovdan & Clausen, Tommy Hoyvarde, 2021. "Playing 3D chess, or how firms can thrive under complexity: The mediating role of innovation capabilities in the use of innovation input," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-13.
    19. Chiara Franco & Alberto Marzucchi & Sandro Montresor, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, innovation cooperation and human-capital. Evidence from 3 European countries," JRC Research Reports JRC77090, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Ku-Ho Lin, 2019. "Impact of Ambidexterity and Environmental Dynamism on Dynamic Capability Development Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:69:y:2016:i:5:p:1544-1549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.