IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/manrev/v75y2025i2d10.1007_s11301-024-00424-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bidding for B2B or B2G tenders: toward the adoption of pricing models in practice

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz Herrmann

    (Torrens University Australia)

  • M. J. Cobo Martín

    (University of Granada)

Abstract

This study investigates the lack of adoption of pricing models for tenders in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-government (B2G) markets. We aim to identify the gaps between research and practice and propose a future research agenda to bridge these gaps. Our study contributes in three ways: First, we outline how our research agenda can influence the adoption of pricing models across specific practitioner roles in tendering. Second, we introduce systematic science mapping (SSM) as a novel methodology for literature reviews. SSM combines a systematic review and science mapping in a multi-stage, mixed-methods research design. We chart the evolution of 1042 research publications from 1956 to 2022 into three thematic areas. Our review of 163 gray literature publications reveals seven schools of thought on tender price modeling and the causes of theory-to-practice gaps. Finally, we introduce a new metric, the mapping factor (MAPF), as a robustness indicator for systematic literature reviews.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz Herrmann & M. J. Cobo Martín, 2025. "Bidding for B2B or B2G tenders: toward the adoption of pricing models in practice," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 1495-1533, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-024-00424-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11301-024-00424-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-024-00424-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11301-024-00424-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heinz Herrmann, 2019. "How to Increase Profits Through Predictive Analytics When Only Few Competitors’ Bids Are Known," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 8(1), pages 61-76, March.
    2. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López‐Herrera & E. Herrera‐Viedma & F. Herrera, 2012. "SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(8), pages 1609-1630, August.
    3. Osborne, Martin J., 2009. "Introduction to Game Theory: International Edition," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195322484, Decembrie.
    4. Peter Džupka & Matúš Kubák & Peter Nemec, 2020. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Niccolò Comerio & Fernanda Strozzi, 2019. "Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(1), pages 109-131, February.
    6. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    7. Martin Skitmore, 2008. "First and second price independent values sealed bid procurement auctions: some scalar equilibrium results," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 787-803.
    8. Michael H. Rothkopf, 2007. "Thirteen Reasons Why the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves Process Is Not Practical," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 191-197, April.
    9. Michael H. Rothkopf & Ronald M. Harstad, 1994. "Modeling Competitive Bidding: A Critical Essay," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 364-384, March.
    10. Mohammed Wanous & Halim Boussabaine & John Lewis, 2003. "A neural network bid/no bid model: the case for contractors in Syria," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 737-744.
    11. Christian Sternitzke & Isumo Bergmann, 2009. "Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 113-130, January.
    12. Omar Itani & Vishag Badrinarayanan & Deva Rangarajan, 2022. "The impact of business-to-business salespeople’s social media use on value co-creation and cross/up-selling: the role of social capital," Post-Print hal-03978956, HAL.
    13. William Vickrey, 1961. "Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 16(1), pages 8-37, March.
    14. Bj–rn Johnson & Edward Lorenz & Bengt-Åke Lundvall, 2002. "Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge?," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 11(2), pages 245-262.
    15. Martin Skitmore, 2004. "Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: the effects of outliers on bidding models," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 101-109.
    16. M Skitmore, 2002. "Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: a comparison of models," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(1), pages 47-56, January.
    17. Christian Fisch & Joern Block, 2018. "Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 103-106, April.
    18. William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson, 2001. "The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(2), pages 291-314, October.
    19. Güçbilmez, Ufuk & Ó Briain, Tomás, 2021. "Bidding styles of institutional investors in IPO auctions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    21. Su Xiu Xu & George Q. Huang, 2015. "Auction-based transportation procurement in make-to-order systems," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1236-1251, November.
    22. Martin Skitmore & Hedley Smyth, 2007. "Pricing construction work: a marketing viewpoint," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 619-630.
    23. Goran Runeson & Martin Skitmore, 1999. "Tendering theory revisited," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 285-296.
    24. Borges, Aline F.S. & Laurindo, Fernando J.B. & Spínola, Mauro M. & Gonçalves, Rodrigo F. & Mattos, Claudia A., 2021. "The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    25. Johan Nyström & Svante Mandell, 2019. "Skew to win, not to profit – unbalanced bidding among informed bidders," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 46-54, March.
    26. Santana, Monica & Cobo, Manuel J., 2020. "What is the future of work? A science mapping analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 846-862.
    27. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2012. "SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(8), pages 1609-1630, August.
    28. Sandy D. Jap & Prasad A. Naik, 2008. "BidAnalyzer: A Method for Estimation and Selection of Dynamic Bidding Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 949-960, 11-12.
    29. Shree, Deep & Kumar Singh, Rajesh & Paul, Justin & Hao, Andy & Xu, Shichun, 2021. "Digital platforms for business-to-business markets: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 354-365.
    30. Perianes-Rodriguez, Antonio & Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan, 2016. "Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 1178-1195.
    31. Lawrence Friedman, 1956. "A Competitive-Bidding Strategy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 104-112, February.
    32. Martin Skitmore & Goran Runeson, 2006. "Bidding models: testing the stationarity assumption," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 791-803.
    33. Richard Engelbrecht-Wiggans & Ernan Haruvy & Elena Katok, 2007. "A Comparison of Buyer-Determined and Price-Based Multiattribute Mechanisms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 629-641, 09-10.
    34. Martin Skitmore, 2014. "kmth price sealed-bid auctions with general independent values and equilibrium linear mark-ups," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(12), pages 1864-1875, December.
    35. M. Heyvaert & B. Maes & P. Onghena, 2013. "Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 659-676, February.
    36. Heinz Herrmann & Sudhir Rana, 2020. "Which B2B thinker are you?," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(1), pages 45-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    2. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Juan Vidal & Ramón A. Carrasco & Manuel J. Cobo & María F. Blasco, 2024. "Data Sources as a Driver for Market-Oriented Tourism Organizations: a Bibliometric Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 7588-7621, June.
    4. Nabila Abid & James A Cunningham & José-Luis Perea-Vicente, 2024. "A thematic review of 45 years of The Journal of Technology Transfer," Post-Print hal-04980007, HAL.
    5. Michael H. Rothkopf, 2007. "Decision Analysis: The Right Tool for Auctions," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 167-172, September.
    6. Lorentziadis, Panos L., 2016. "Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 347-371.
    7. Raquel Ruiz-Rodríguez & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2023. "Neuroleadership: a new way for happiness management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Qiao, Yu & Labi, Samuel & Fricker, Jon D., 2021. "Does highway project bundling policy affect bidding competition? Insights from a mixed ordinal logistic model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 228-242.
    9. Ballesteros-Pérez, Pablo & del Campo-Hitschfeld, Maria Luisa & Mora-Melià, Daniel & Domínguez, David, 2015. "Modeling bidding competitiveness and position performance in multi-attribute construction auctions," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 24-35.
    10. Alexander Wenzel & Pablo Guindos & Manuel Carpio, 2025. "Using Timber in Mid-Rise and Tall Buildings to Construct Our Cities: A Science Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, February.
    11. A. Velez-Estevez & P. García-Sánchez & J. A. Moral-Munoz & M. J. Cobo, 2022. "Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7517-7555, December.
    12. Batista-Canino, Rosa M. & Santana-Hernández, Lidia & Medina-Brito, Pino, 2024. "A holistic literature review on entrepreneurial Intention: A scientometric approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Ronald M. Harstad & Aleksandar Saša Pekeč, 2008. "Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 367-380, October.
    14. Lorentziadis, Panos L., 2012. "Optimal bidding in auctions of mixed populations of bidders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 653-663.
    15. Mónica Santana & Mirta Díaz-Fernández, 2023. "Competencies for the artificial intelligence age: visualisation of the state of the art and future perspectives," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 1971-2004, August.
    16. Gomez-Jauregui, Valentin & Gomez-Jauregui, Cecilia & Manchado, Cristina & Otero, Cesar, 2014. "Information management and improvement of citation indices," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 257-271.
    17. Eva-María Mora-Valentín & Marta Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado & Juan-José Nájera-Sánchez, 2018. "Mapping the conceptual structure of science and technology parks," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1410-1435, October.
    18. Arash Najmaei & Zahra Sadeghinejad, 2023. "Green and sustainable business models: historical roots, growth trajectory, conceptual architecture and an agenda for future research—A bibliometric review of green and sustainable business models," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 957-999, February.
    19. Dutta, Goutam & Natesan, Sumeetha R., 2016. "Optimization of Customized Pricing with Multiple Overlapping Competing Bids," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-11-02, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    20. Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden & Karen Pak & Mónica Santana, 2021. "Menopause and Sustainable Career Outcomes: A Science Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-21, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitive bidding; Tendering; B2B pricing; Systematic science mapping (SSM); Systematic review; Mapping factor (MAPF);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms
    • L74 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Construction
    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:75:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-024-00424-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.