IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v22y2025i2d10.1007_s12208-025-00430-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analysis and scientific mapping of the literature on political marketing and brand: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyoon An

    (Fayetteville State University)

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the scholarship of political marketing and brand. The systematic literature review method was conducted to assess the emergence and influence of the evolving scholarship by performance analysis and scientific mapping. Whereas performance analysis summarizes publication trends and most influential papers based on citation counts at the micro level, scientific mapping examines keywords, papers, and themes with network analysis for interwoven relationships at the meso and macro levels. The results revealed the rising dominance of the voter-consumer paradigm to view voters and political campaigns as political brand consumers and branding strategies. This research has identified the lack of promotion and engagement for social goods through political marketing in scholarship, which threatens the important role of civic society: the collective pursuit of social good. Theoretical implications were drawn from the critical marketing perspective by examining the risks, consequences, and remedies of the voter-consumer paradigm. Practitioners may develop strategies for working with emerging technologies for political brands, as exhibited in Truth Social’s engagement and political polarization. Future researchers gain insights from the research propositions based on the Theory-Context-Characteristics-Methodology (TCCM) framework. They may conduct an empirical investigation with longitudinal research from the processual perspective with big data to expand empirical contexts. This approach helps enhance the representation of social issues on diversity, equity, and inclusion and advises implementing evidence-driven strategies to co-create political brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyoon An, 2025. "Performance analysis and scientific mapping of the literature on political marketing and brand: a systematic review," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(2), pages 327-347, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00430-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-025-00430-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-025-00430-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-025-00430-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    2. Paul, Justin & Criado, Alex Rialp, 2020. "The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    3. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    4. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López‐Herrera & E. Herrera‐Viedma & F. Herrera, 2012. "SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(8), pages 1609-1630, August.
    5. Mustak, Mekhail & Salminen, Joni & Plé, Loïc & Wirtz, Jochen, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 389-404.
    6. Vallaster, Christine & von Wallpach, Sylvia, 2013. "An online discursive inquiry into the social dynamics of multi-stakeholder brand meaning co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1505-1515.
    7. Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2024. "How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Jiyoon An, 2024. "Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: review and research trend," Maritime Business Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 229-242, July.
    9. Koll, Oliver & von Wallpach, Sylvia & Uzelac, Borislav, 2023. "Stakeholder-oriented brand management: A Venn-diagram approach to monitor brand associations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 437-444.
    10. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Rojas-Lamorena, Álvaro J. & Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Alcántara-Pilar, Juan Miguel, 2022. "A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: A bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1067-1083.
    12. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    13. Dennis F. X. Mathaisel & Clare L. Comm, 2021. "Political marketing with data analytics," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 56-64, March.
    14. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2012. "SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(8), pages 1609-1630, August.
    15. Martin Mende & Abhishek Borah & Maura L Scott & Lisa E Bolton & Leonard Lee, 2024. "People, Peace, Prosperity, and the Planet: A Journey toward Sustainable Development in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 51(1), pages 91-103.
    16. Black, Iain & Veloutsou, Cleopatra, 2017. "Working consumers: Co-creation of brand identity, consumer identity and brand community identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 416-429.
    17. Lawrence D. Fu & Constantin F. Aliferis, 2010. "Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(1), pages 257-270, October.
    18. Anne-Wil Harzing & Satu Alakangas, 2016. "Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 787-804, February.
    19. Margaret Scammell, 2007. "Political Brands and Consumer Citizens: The Rebranding of Tony Blair," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 176-192, May.
    20. Mekhail Mustak & Joni Salminen & Loïc Plé & Jochen Wirtz, 2021. "Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda," Post-Print hal-03269994, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    2. Erik Karger & Marvin Jagals & Frederik Ahlemann, 2021. "Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    3. Sakshi Goyal & Praveen Goyal, 2024. "The evolution of pro‐environmental behavior research in three decades using bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4133-4153, September.
    4. Areeba Khan & Saboohi Nasim, 2025. "Mapping research on the subjective well-being of knowledge workers: a systematic enquiry deploying bibliometrics," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 911-954, February.
    5. Ahmed Gamal ElKattan & Diana Gavilan & Mohamed Hamed Elsharnouby & Amira Fouad Ahmed Mahran, 2024. "Mapping sharing economy themes: science mapping, topic modeling, and research agenda," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 843-864, December.
    6. Omar Carrasco-Carvajal & Mauricio Castillo-Vergara & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2023. "Measuring open innovation in SMEs: an overview of current research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 397-442, February.
    7. Lopreite, Milena & Misuraca, Michelangelo & Puliga, Michelangelo, 2023. "An analysis of the thematic evolution of ageing and healthcare expenditure using word embedding: A scoping review of policy implications," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    8. Marcel R. Sieber & Milan Malý & Radek Liška, 2022. "Conceptualizing organizational culture and business-IT alignment: a systematic literature review," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Shreya Mishra & Ajoy K. Dey, 2023. "Expectation of the Editors’ from Hybrid Review Studies: Focus on Contribution," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(3), pages 243-252, December.
    10. Baliga, Ashwin J. & Goel, Ashish & Fletcher-Chen, Chavi C.-Y. & Guda, Sridhar & Kumar, Rajesh, 2025. "Mental health among B2B salespeople: A morphological analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Seuring, 2023. "How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1899-1933, July.
    12. Ed-Dafali, Slimane & Patel, Ritesh & Iqbal, Najaf, 2023. "A bibliometric review of dividend policy literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Mariani, Marcello M. & Machado, Isa & Magrelli, Vittoria & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Siano, Alfonso & Vollero, Agostino & Bertolini, Alessandra, 2022. "From brand control to brand co-creation: An integrated framework of brand paradigms and emerging brand perspectives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 372-386.
    15. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    16. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    17. Alida Volkmer, Sara & Meißner, Martin, 2024. "Beyond livestreaming: The rise of social media gifting and paid memberships − A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    19. Guillén-Pujadas, Miguel & Alaminos, David & Vizuete-Luciano, Emili & Callejón-Gil, Ángela M. & Merigó-Lindahl, José María, 2024. "Mapping the evolution of ethical standards in trading: A bibliometric analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    20. Alexander Wenzel & Pablo Guindos & Manuel Carpio, 2025. "Using Timber in Mid-Rise and Tall Buildings to Construct Our Cities: A Science Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12208-025-00430-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.