IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v8y2025i4d10.1007_s42001-025-00408-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Even I believed it! How is it possible?” The disinformation exam of journalists in the AI age: fuzzy logical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gülay Demir

    (Sivas Cumhuriyet University)

  • Sefer Darıcı

    (Sivas Cumhuriyet University
    Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC))

  • Zekiye Tamer

    (Sivas Cumhuriyet University)

  • Onur Taydaş

    (Sivas Cumhuriyet University)

  • Dragan Pamučar

    (Korea University
    Dogus University
    Western Caspian University)

Abstract

This research investigates the impact of fake news photos generated by artificial intelligence (AI) compared to real news photos. In the experimental phase, 20 reporters with at least 5 years of experience from various national media organizations in Turkey evaluated the “news impact” of selected published news stories in their original form and with AI-generated photos. The results indicate that while the criterion “news photo (image)” ranked highest for real photos, it ranked lowest for AI-generated photos. For real news, experts prioritized “photograph/visual of the news” as the most important criterion, followed by the presence of expert opinion and public authority. In contrast, for AI-generated photos, the presence of expert opinion was the top criterion. Interestingly, experts did not question the authenticity of AI-generated photos but rated them as less impactful. The fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operator to synthesise expert opinions. The F-WENSLO analysis demonstrated a difference in the magnitude of criteria only in the “Photo/image of the news,” indicating a distinction between real and AI-generated photos in this aspect. However, the F-CRADIS analysis revealed that the overall ranking of news items did not significantly differ between real and AI-generated photos, suggesting that AI-generated photos produce an impact close to real ones. This study, limited to experienced reporters in Turkey, highlights the potential of AI to mislead experts and underscores the need for robust verification methods in news media. In this context, the scope encompasses any aspect of human–computer interaction (HCI) within the field of information science. Through this sentence, the research not only summarizes the effects of news photos but also addresses a broader aspect of information science, thereby encapsulating the significant findings of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Gülay Demir & Sefer Darıcı & Zekiye Tamer & Onur Taydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2025. "“Even I believed it! How is it possible?” The disinformation exam of journalists in the AI age: fuzzy logical approach," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 1-48, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00408-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-025-00408-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-025-00408-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-025-00408-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s42001-025-00408-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.