IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v68y2022ics0160791x22000288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers

Author

Listed:
  • Sindhwani, Rahul
  • Afridi, Shayan
  • Kumar, Anil
  • Banaitis, Audrius
  • Luthra, Sunil
  • Singh, Punj Lata

Abstract

The ever-changing times demand a resilient industry that quickly adapts to the oncoming wave of new technology; however, a strong social environment that comprises organic social values is needed for a thriving human society. Industry 4.0 has become the standard for applications in recent years, as its technologies are rapidly being implemented and positively impacting every sector. However, these developments are still unable to achieve the desired outcomes and have neglected the environment by prioritizing machines over humans. Therefore, the Industry 5.0 (I5.0) revolution is a call to bring forth the ideas of sustainability into practice, integrate human values with technology, and is considered a step forward for achieving sustainable development goals. Hence, the present study proposes a framework for analyzing I5.0 enablers for achieving sustainability by integrating human values with technology. To achieve the objectives, this study was conducted in three different phases: 1) through extensive review, the list of criteria and enablers was identified; 2) Pythagorean fuzzy Delphi was used to validate the enablers against criteria; 3) a hybrid approach of Pythagorean fuzzy analytical hierarchy process-combined compromise solution was employed to calculate the weights of selected criteria and determine the ranks of enablers. A sensitivity analysis was then performed to check the robustness of this framework. The findings show that the criterion of personal customization obtained the highest weight followed by human-machine collaboration, which will create a smart cognitive environment for humans. Human intelligence is used in more important places, which will help society focus on developing social values. The authors also put forward seven propositions about adopting I5.0 enablers for best results, taking examples from existing case studies and helping industrialists adopt I5.0 methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Sindhwani, Rahul & Afridi, Shayan & Kumar, Anil & Banaitis, Audrius & Luthra, Sunil & Singh, Punj Lata, 2022. "Can industry 5.0 revolutionize the wave of resilience and social value creation? A multi-criteria framework to analyze enablers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22000288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101887?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seppo Leminen & Mika Westerlund, 2012. "Towards innovation in Living Labs networks," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1/2), pages 43-59.
    2. Anil Kumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Varun Agrawal & Kartik Sharma & Divyanshu Gupta, 2019. "When risks need attention: adoption of green supply chain initiatives in the pharmaceutical industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 3554-3576, June.
    3. Dost, Mir & Badir, Yuosre F. & Sambasivan, Murali & Umrani, Waheed Ali, 2020. "Open-and-closed process innovation generation and adoption: Analyzing the effects of sources of knowledge," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    4. Daniel Paschek & Anca Mocan & Anca Draghici, 2019. "Industry 5.0 – The Expected Impact Of Next Industrial Revolution," Thriving on Future Education, Industry, Business and Society; Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM International Conference 2019,, ToKnowPress.
    5. Erlane K Ghani & Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, 2019. "Industry 4.0: Employers Expectations of Accounting Graduates and its Implications on Teaching and Learning Practices," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 19-29.
    6. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Pradeep & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2015. "Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 375-390.
    7. Lioutas, Evagelos D. & Charatsari, Chrysanthi & De Rosa, Marcello, 2021. "Digitalization of agriculture: A way to solve the food problem or a trolley dilemma?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Erlane K Ghani & Kamaruzzaman Muhammad, 2019. "Industry 4.0: Employers Expectations of Accounting Graduates and its Implications on Teaching and Learning Practices," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 19-29.
    9. Ling Li, 2020. "Education supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 579-592, July.
    10. Naveed, Kashif & Watanabe, Chihiro & Neittaanmäki, Pekka, 2018. "The transformative direction of innovation toward an IoT-based society - Increasing dependency on uncaptured GDP in global ICT firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 23-46.
    11. Sony, Michael & Naik, Subhash, 2020. "Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Sony, Michael & Antony, Jiju & Mc Dermott, Olivia & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, 2021. "An empirical examination of benefits, challenges, and critical success factors of industry 4.0 in manufacturing and service sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Tay, S.I. & Alipal, J. & Lee, T.C., 2021. "Industry 4.0: Current practice and challenges in Malaysian manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Pratibha Rani & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    15. Selimović, Jasmina & Pilav-Velić, Amila & Krndžija, Lamija, 2021. "Digital workplace transformation in the financial service sector: Investigating the relationship between employees' expectations and intentions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin & Jabbour, Charbel Jose Chiappetta & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ndubisi, Nelson Oly & Venkatesh, Mani, 2021. "Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Morteza Yazdani & Pascale Zaraté & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Zenonas Turskis, 2019. "A Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems," Post-Print hal-02879091, HAL.
    18. Xiao Chen & Martin A. Eder & Asm Shihavuddin & Dan Zheng, 2021. "A Human-Cyber-Physical System toward Intelligent Wind Turbine Operation and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, January.
    19. Reiman, Arto & Kaivo-oja, Jari & Parviainen, Elina & Takala, Esa-Pekka & Lauraeus, Theresa, 2021. "Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context – A scoping review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behl, Abhishek & Singh, Ramandeep & Pereira, Vijay & Laker, Benjamin, 2023. "Analysis of Industry 4.0 and circular economy enablers: A step towards resilient sustainable operations management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Sindhwani, Rahul & Singh, Punj Lata & Behl, Abhishek & Afridi, Mohd. Shayan & Sammanit, Debaroti & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2022. "Modeling the critical success factors of implementing net zero emission (NZE) and promoting resilience and social value creation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Chand Bhatt, Priyanka & Kumar, Vimal & Lu, Tzu-Chuen & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Technology convergence assessment: Case of blockchain within the IR 4.0 platform," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Somohano-Rodríguez, Francisco M. & Madrid-Guijarro, Antonia, 2022. "Do industry 4.0 technologies improve Cantabrian manufacturing smes performance? The role played by industry competition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Sayyid Ali Banihashemi & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Jurgita Antucheviciene, 2021. "Investigating the Environmental Impacts of Construction Projects in Time-Cost Trade-Off Project Scheduling Problems with CoCoSo Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Haolun Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Circular Supplier Selection in the Power Battery Industry Using a Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MAGDM Model Based on the Improved ARAS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Haolun Wang & Faming Zhang & Kifayat Ullah, 2022. "Waste Clothing Recycling Channel Selection Using a CoCoSo-D Method Based on Sine Trigonometric Interaction Operational Laws with Pythagorean Fuzzy Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Alka Kumari & Manvendra Pratap Singh, 2025. "The dharma of work: Cracking the code to social sustainability puzzle for the future of human resources," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2047-2059, April.
    9. Puppala, Harish & Maganti, Lakshmi Sirisha & Peddinti, Pranav R.T. & Motapothula, Mallikarjuna Rao, 2024. "Thermographic inspections of solar photovoltaic plants in India using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Analysing the gap between theory and practice," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    10. Pratibha Rani & Jabir Ali & Raghunathan Krishankumar & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Fausto Cavallaro & Kattur S. Ravichandran, 2021. "An Integrated Single-Valued Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution Methodology for Renewable Energy Resource Selection Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:1095-1105 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    13. Rohit Agrawal & Vishal A. Wankhede & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2021. "Analysing the roadblocks of circular economy adoption in the automobile sector: Reducing waste and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1051-1066, February.
    14. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Leonardo de Assis Santos & Leonardo Marques, 2022. "Big data analytics for supply chain risk management: research opportunities at process crossroads," Post-Print hal-03766121, HAL.
    17. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Michael Görges & Michael Freitag, 2022. "Design and Evaluation of an Integrated Autonomous Control Method for Automobile Terminals," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Xue, Biao & Lin, Yan & Ren, Fangxiao & Li, Runfo, 2024. "Business environment ecosystem and manufacturing upgrading: A configurational approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1225-1237.
    20. Kamil Wrobel, 2024. "Modelling Sustainable Organizational Development and the Scope of Ergonomic Interventions," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 560-581.
    21. Ágota Bányai & Tamás Bányai, 2022. "Real-Time Maintenance Policy Optimization in Manufacturing Systems: An Energy Efficiency and Emission-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.