IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v22y2025i1d10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countering activism from CSR beneficiaries: a typology of strategic responses for firms

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Mahimkar

    (The University of Texas at El Paso)

  • Edward Ramirez

    (The University of Texas at El Paso)

Abstract

In the context of targeted activism, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives serve as both an asset and a liability for firms. While these initiatives can bolster firms’ reputations as socially responsible entities, deterring activism, they may also attract activism from the very groups they aim to support. Extant research lacks guidance on how CSR firms can respond to such challenges, highlighting the need for further investigation. Drawing on Construal Level and Socio-cognitive theories, this paper proposes strategic responses for CSR firms based on Hirschman’s Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (EVL) framework. Using a qualitative case study approach, it analyzes firms’ strategic responses—Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Boycott—demonstrating how varied approaches, influenced by construal levels, CSR strategies, and contextual factors, safeguard brand integrity. Furthermore, this study enhances the EVL framework by introducing Boycott as a new response option, broadening its applicability to individuals, groups, and firms. It concludes by offering essential recommendations to help firms prevent future activism and establish a successful, long-term CSR strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Mahimkar & Edward Ramirez, 2025. "Countering activism from CSR beneficiaries: a typology of strategic responses for firms," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(1), pages 167-190, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard B. Freeman, 1980. "The Exit-Voice Tradeoff in the Labor Market: Unionism, Job Tenure, Quits, and Separations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 94(4), pages 643-673.
    2. Maxwell, John W & Lyon, Thomas P & Hackett, Steven C, 2000. "Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 583-617, October.
    3. McDonnell, Mary-Hunter & King, Brayden & Soule, Sarah A., 2015. "A Dynamic Process Model of Private Politics: Activist Targeting and Corporate Receptivity to Social Challenges," Research Papers 3319, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    4. Rashid Saeed, Muhammad & Khan, Huda & Lee, Richard & Lockshin, Larry & Bellman, Steven & Cohen, Justin & Yang, Song, 2024. "Construal level theory in advertising research: A systematic review and directions for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Young, Dennis R, 1976. "Consolidation or Diversity: Choices in the Structure of Urban Governance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(2), pages 378-385, May.
    6. David P. Baron & Daniel Diermeier, 2007. "Strategic Activism and Nonmarket Strategy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 599-634, September.
    7. Alexander Chernev & Sean Blair, 2015. "Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1412-1425.
    8. Matevž (Matt) Rašković & Katalin Takacs Haynes & Anastas Vangeli, 2024. "The emergence of populism as an institution and its recursive mechanisms: A socio-cognitive theory perspective," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 19-40, March.
    9. Maute, Manfred F. & Forrester, William Jr., 1993. "The structure and determinants of consumer complaint intentions and behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 219-247, June.
    10. Cannings, Kathy, 1989. "An exit-voice model of managerial attachment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 107-129, August.
    11. Kato, Junko, 1998. "When the Party Breaks Up: Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 92(4), pages 857-870, December.
    12. Peter Foreman, 2024. "Organizational attachment in hybrids: identification, commitment and exit/voice/loyalty," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 1855-1872, August.
    13. Ran Tao & Jian Wu & Hong Zhao, 2023. "Do Corporate Customers Prefer Socially Responsible Suppliers? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 689-712, July.
    14. Paul C. Godfrey & Craig B. Merrill & Jared M. Hansen, 2009. "The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 425-445, April.
    15. Malik, Mohsin & Andargoli, Amir & Ali, Imran & Chavez, Roberto, 2024. "A socio-cognitive theorisation of how data-driven digital transformation affects operational productivity?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kolcava, Dennis, 2020. "Do citizens hold business accountable for greenwashing by demanding more government intervention?," OSF Preprints sj4dk, Center for Open Science.
    2. Johan Graafland, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Put Reputation at Risk by Inviting Activist Targeting? An Empirical Test among European SMEs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Adam R. Fremeth & Guy L. F. Holburn & Richard G. Vanden Bergh, 2016. "Corporate Political Strategy in Contested Regulatory Environments," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 272-284, December.
    4. Dylan Minor, 2015. "The Value of Corporate Citizenship: Protection," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-021, Harvard Business School.
    5. David A. Dana & Janice Nadler, 2019. "Regulation, Public Attitudes, and Private Governance," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 69-93, March.
    6. Richard Hunt & Lauren Ortiz-Hunt, 2018. "Deinstitutionalization through Business Model Evolution: Women Entrepreneurs in the Middle East and North Africa," Chapters, in: Ladislav Mura (ed.), Entrepreneurship - Development Tendencies and Empirical Approach, IntechOpen.
    7. Aaron K. Chatterji & David I. Levine & Michael W. Toffel, 2009. "How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 125-169, March.
    8. Mohammed Benlemlih & M. Arif & M. Nadeem, 2023. "Institutional Ownership and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Comparative Study of the UK and the USA," Post-Print hal-04435468, HAL.
    9. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    10. Meiying Hua & Pervaiz Alam, 2021. "Audit Quality and Environment, Social, and Governance Risks," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(2), pages 50-75, April.
    11. Hayagreeva Rao & Sunasir Dutta, 2018. "Why Great Strategies Spring from Identity Movements," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 313-322, March.
    12. David P. Baron, 2016. "Self‐Regulation and the Market for Activism," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 584-607, September.
    13. Chung, Leanne & Lo, Carlos Wing-Hung & Li, Pansy Hon Ying, 2016. "The interaction effects of institutional constraints on managerial intentions and sustainable performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 374-383.
    14. Julien Daubanes & Jean-Charles Rochet, 2019. "The Rise of NGO Activism," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 183-212, November.
    15. Mukherjee, Vivekananda & Ramani, Shyama V., 2011. "Voluntary agreements and community development as CSR in innovation strategies," MERIT Working Papers 2011-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    16. Anat Toder‐Alon & Eyal Rosenstreich & Tali Te'eni Harari, 2019. "Give or take? Consumers' ambivalent perspectives on the relationship between a firm's corporate social responsibility engagement and its responsible tax payments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 872-884, July.
    17. Chien‐Ming Chen & Maria J. Montes‐Sancho, 2017. "Do Perceived Operational Impacts Affect the Portfolio of Carbon‐Abatement Technologies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 235-248, May.
    18. Zhi Li & Jiuchang Wei & Yue Gurt Ge, 2023. "Local Support for the Corporate New Investment Project: The Roles of Corporate Reputation, Project’s CSR Behavior and Residential Income Level," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 59-85, March.
    19. Timothy Werner, 2015. "Gaining Access by Doing Good: The Effect of Sociopolitical Reputation on Firm Participation in Public Policy Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1989-2011, August.
    20. Baron, David P. & Harjoto, Maretno A. & Jo, Hoje, 2009. "The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance," Research Papers 1993r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.