IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/irpnmk/v22y2025i1d10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countering activism from CSR beneficiaries: a typology of strategic responses for firms

Author

Listed:
  • Amit Mahimkar

    (The University of Texas at El Paso)

  • Edward Ramirez

    (The University of Texas at El Paso)

Abstract

In the context of targeted activism, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives serve as both an asset and a liability for firms. While these initiatives can bolster firms’ reputations as socially responsible entities, deterring activism, they may also attract activism from the very groups they aim to support. Extant research lacks guidance on how CSR firms can respond to such challenges, highlighting the need for further investigation. Drawing on Construal Level and Socio-cognitive theories, this paper proposes strategic responses for CSR firms based on Hirschman’s Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (EVL) framework. Using a qualitative case study approach, it analyzes firms’ strategic responses—Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Boycott—demonstrating how varied approaches, influenced by construal levels, CSR strategies, and contextual factors, safeguard brand integrity. Furthermore, this study enhances the EVL framework by introducing Boycott as a new response option, broadening its applicability to individuals, groups, and firms. It concludes by offering essential recommendations to help firms prevent future activism and establish a successful, long-term CSR strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit Mahimkar & Edward Ramirez, 2025. "Countering activism from CSR beneficiaries: a typology of strategic responses for firms," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(1), pages 167-190, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12208-024-00422-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:irpnmk:v:22:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12208-024-00422-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.