IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v22y2024i3d10.1007_s10257-024-00681-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing next generation BP-x initiatives

Author

Listed:
  • Myriam Schaschek

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

  • Fabian Gwinner

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

  • Nicolas Neis

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

  • Christoph Tomitza

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

  • Christian Zeiß

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

  • Axel Winkelmann

    (Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg (JMU))

Abstract

Past generations of BPM involved the efficient and effective management of business processes. Yet, we currently face a turning point. The technological facets of data-driven BPM add complexity to traditional BPM applications. As a result, organizations face intended and unintended technology-related changes across all business process initiatives. Using the term BP-x, we summarize the recent changes in BPM knowledge that has hitherto been fragmented across academic literature. To address the challenges of BP-x initiatives, we envision a holistic model that focuses on managing related cutting-edge technologies and BPM. Thus, we propose the operationalized BP-x management model as a valuable IT meta-artifact. We develop the model using a two-cycled Design Science Research methodology and conduct a threefold summative evaluation. The results of our study indicate that creating awareness of potentials and opportunities accelerates the process toward action and fosters new business outcomes in terms of performance and innovation. By strategically aligning BP-x endeavors, organizations promote visibility, shared understanding, and culture among stakeholders. Our model guides managers throughout the BP-x adoption journey in conjunction with organizational, managerial, and technological prerequisites.

Suggested Citation

  • Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-024-00681-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-024-00681-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-024-00681-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-024-00681-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Engel & Philipp Ebel & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2022. "Cognitive automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 339-350, March.
    2. Juhani Iivari, 2015. "Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 107-115, January.
    3. Georgi Dimov Kerpedzhiev & Ulrich Matthias König & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Rosemann, 2021. "An Exploration into Future Business Process Management Capabilities in View of Digitalization," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(2), pages 83-96, April.
    4. Thomas Grisold & Steven Groß & Katharina Stelzl & Jan Brocke & Jan Mendling & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Rosemann, 2022. "The Five Diamond Method for Explorative Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(2), pages 149-166, April.
    5. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    6. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993. "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 90-91.
    7. Richard Baskerville & Jan Pries-Heje, 2010. "Explanatory Design Theory," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(5), pages 271-282, October.
    8. Daniel Beverungen & Joos C. A. M. Buijs & Jörg Becker & Claudio Ciccio & Wil M. P. Aalst & Christian Bartelheimer & Jan Brocke & Marco Comuzzi & Karsten Kraume & Henrik Leopold & Martin Matzner & Jan , 2021. "Seven Paradoxes of Business Process Management in a Hyper-Connected World," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(2), pages 145-156, April.
    9. Haridimos Tsoukas & Robert Chia, 2002. "On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
    10. Škrinjar, Rok & Trkman, Peter, 2013. "Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices’," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 48-60.
    11. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    12. Joost F Wolfswinkel & Elfi Furtmueller & Celeste P M Wilderom, 2013. "Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 45-55, January.
    13. Wasana Bandara & Guy G Gable & Michael Rosemann, 2005. "Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 347-360, December.
    14. Niels Martin & Dominik A. Fischer & Georgi D. Kerpedzhiev & Kanika Goel & Sander J. J. Leemans & Maximilian Röglinger & Wil M. P. van der Aalst & Marlon Dumas & Marcello La Rosa & Moe T. Wynn, 2021. "Opportunities and Challenges for Process Mining in Organizations: Results of a Delphi Study," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(5), pages 511-527, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paola Lara Machado & Montijn Ven & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken & Jan Brocke, 2024. "Navigating Business Model Redesign: The Compass Method for Identifying Changes to the Operating Model," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 607-638, October.
    2. Nagle, Tadhg & Doyle, Cathal & Alhassan, Ibrahim & Sammon, David, 2020. "The Research Method we Need or Deserve? A Literature Review of the Design Science Research Landscape," OSF Preprints yjbd7_v1, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy & Aygun Shafagatova, 2024. "Business Process Performance," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(1), pages 67-84, February.
    4. Christoph Stoiber & Maximilian Stöter & Ludwig Englbrecht & Stefan Schönig & Björn Häckel, 2023. "Keeping Your Maturity Assessment Alive," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(6), pages 703-721, December.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7962 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Jonathan Brock & Katharina Brennig & Bernd Löhr & Christian Bartelheimer & Sebastian Enzberg & Roman Dumitrescu, 2024. "Improving Process Mining Maturity – From Intentions to Actions," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 585-605, October.
    7. Enrique Saravia-Vergara & Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa & Gema Albort-Morant, 2023. "Organizational Culture, Process Management and Maturity of the Process: An Empirical Study of the Process Status in Peru," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(2), pages 258-280, April.
    8. Hunton, James E. & Gibson, Dana, 1999. "Soliciting user-input during the development of an accounting information system: investigating the efficacy of group discussion," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 597-618, October.
    9. Dedi I. Inan & Ghassan Beydoun & Biswajeet Pradhan, 2022. "Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2077-2097, December.
    10. Valerie Graf-Drasch & Robert Keller & Oliver Meindl & Felix Röhrich, 2023. "The Design of Citizen-Centric Green IS in Sustainable Smart Districts," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(5), pages 521-538, October.
    11. Arline Savage & Joesph Callaghan & Li Dang & Y. Sun, 2010. "Operating Performance in the Wake of ERP Implementation: Triangulating Results for Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Discussion Paper Series 2010-03, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte.
    12. Amandine Pascal & Alexandre Renaud, 2020. "15 Years of Information System Design Science Research: A Bibliographic Analysis," Post-Print halshs-02489630, HAL.
    13. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    14. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    15. Shahzad Khurram & Sandra Charreire Petit, 2017. "Investigating the Dynamics of Stakeholder Salience: What Happens When the Institutional Change Process Unfolds?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(3), pages 485-515, July.
    16. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    17. Toppen, R. & Smits, M.T. & Ribbers, P.M.A., 1998. "Improving process performance through market network design : A study of the impact of electronic markets in the financial securities sector," Other publications TiSEM c3c8d2ea-7727-475e-83cf-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    19. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    20. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    21. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10257-024-00681-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.