IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/binfse/v65y2023i6d10.1007_s12599-023-00805-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Keeping Your Maturity Assessment Alive

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Stoiber

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Maximilian Stöter

    (Project Group Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT)

  • Ludwig Englbrecht

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Stefan Schönig

    (University of Regensburg)

  • Björn Häckel

    (Project Group Business & Information Systems Engineering of Fraunhofer FIT
    University of Applied Sciences Augsburg)

Abstract

Maturity models are valuable management tools for assessing and managing capabilities and therefore creating a basis for their identification, prioritization, and further development. Numerous maturity assessment methods have been developed to support organizations in applying maturity models. However, these methods are mostly used for unique assessments and only provide a snapshot of the current state of capabilities and their maturity. Certainly, this does not reflect the continuous change of capabilities within dynamic organizational environments. Moreover, the systematic selection of suitable maturity models and the identification of the actions that should be targeted following the maturity assessment require more attention. To fill these research gaps, this study proposes the generally applicable Continuous Maturity Assessment Method (CMAM) that enables comprehensive and continuous maturity assessments. The CMAM comprises five steps that extend and advance existing principles of maturity assessment and can be implemented as an organizational routine. The rigorous development of the CMAM followed basic principles of the design science research methodology, including an evaluation of six organizations in different industry sectors and an extensive industrial case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Stoiber & Maximilian Stöter & Ludwig Englbrecht & Stefan Schönig & Björn Häckel, 2023. "Keeping Your Maturity Assessment Alive," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(6), pages 703-721, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:65:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00805-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s12599-023-00805-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12599-023-00805-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12599-023-00805-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgi Dimov Kerpedzhiev & Ulrich Matthias König & Maximilian Röglinger & Michael Rosemann, 2021. "An Exploration into Future Business Process Management Capabilities in View of Digitalization," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(2), pages 83-96, April.
    2. Jan Recker, 2013. "Scientific Research in Information Systems," Progress in IS, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-30048-6, December.
    3. Loasby, Brian J., 1998. "The organisation of capabilities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 139-160, April.
    4. John Venable & Jan Pries-Heje & Richard Baskerville, 2016. "FEDS: a Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-89, January.
    5. Frederik Marx & Felix Wortmann & Jörg Mayer, 2012. "A Maturity Model for Management Control Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(4), pages 193-207, August.
    6. Jörg Becker & Ralf Knackstedt & Jens Pöppelbuß, 2009. "Developing Maturity Models for IT Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 213-222, June.
    7. Umit S. Bititci & Patrizia Garengo & Aylin Ates & Sai S. Nudurupati, 2015. "Value of maturity models in performance measurement," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 3062-3085, May.
    8. C J Stefanou, 2001. "A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 204-215, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tristan Thordsen & Markus Bick, 2023. "A decade of digital maturity models: much ado about nothing?," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 947-976, December.
    2. Paola Lara Machado & Montijn Ven & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken & Jan Brocke, 2024. "Navigating Business Model Redesign: The Compass Method for Identifying Changes to the Operating Model," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 607-638, October.
    3. Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.
    4. Michael Möhring & Barbara Keller & Rainer Schmidt & Kurt Sandkuhl & Alfred Zimmermann, 2023. "Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Katharina Breiter & Carlotta Crome & Anna Maria Oberländer & Feline Schnaak, 2024. "Dynamic Capabilities for the Twin Transformation Climb: A Capability Maturity Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 2205-2226, December.
    6. Helena Holter Antonsen & Dag Øivind Madsen, 2021. "Developing a Maturity Model for the Compliance Function of Investment Firms: A Preliminary Case Study from Norway," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-34, October.
    7. Marcus Grieger & André Ludwig, 2019. "On the move towards customer-centric business models in the automotive industry - a conceptual reference framework of shared automotive service systems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 473-500, September.
    8. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Llerena, 2008. "A case study of a creative start-up: governance, communities and knowledge management," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 125-146.
    10. John Finch, 2000. "Is post-Marshallian economics an evolutionary research tradition?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 377-406.
    11. Raffaele Fabio Ciriello & Alexandra Cecilie Gjøl Torbensen & Magnus Rotvit Perlt Hansen & Christoph Müller-Bloch, 2023. "Blockchain-based digital rights management systems: Design principles for the music industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Andreas Engelmann & Gerhard Schwabe, 2024. "Certified data chats for future used car markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Buenstorf, Guido & Costa, Carla, 2018. "Drivers of spin-off performance in industry clusters: Embodied knowledge or embedded firms?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 663-673.
    14. Alexandra Hoess & Jonathan Lautenschlager & Johannes Sedlmeir & Gilbert Fridgen & Vincent Schlatt & Nils Urbach, 2025. "Toward Seamless Mobility-as-a-Service," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 67(2), pages 149-170, April.
    15. Frederik Marx & Felix Wortmann & Jörg Mayer, 2012. "A Maturity Model for Management Control Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(4), pages 193-207, August.
    16. Ramlogan, Ronnie & Consoli, Davide, 2007. "Knowledge, Understanding and the Dynamics of Medical Innovation," European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, Lavoisier, vol. 20(2), pages 231-249.
    17. Taudes, Alfred & Trcka, Michael & Lukanowicz, Martin, 2002. "Organizational learning in production networks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 141-163, February.
    18. Steven DeSimone & Giuseppe D’Onza & Gerrit Sarens, 2019. "Correlates of Internal Audit Function Maturity," Working Papers 1905, College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics.
    19. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy & Aygun Shafagatova, 2024. "Business Process Performance," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(1), pages 67-84, February.
    20. Tom Lewandowski & Emir Kučević & Stephan Leible & Mathis Poser & Tilo Böhmann, 2023. "Enhancing conversational agents for successful operation: A multi-perspective evaluation approach for continuous improvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:binfse:v:65:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s12599-023-00805-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.