IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjisxx/v22y2013i1p45-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature

Author

Listed:
  • Joost F Wolfswinkel
  • Elfi Furtmueller
  • Celeste P M Wilderom

Abstract

This paper offers guidance to conducting a rigorous literature review. We present this in the form of a five-stage process in which we use Grounded Theory as a method. We first probe the guidelines explicated by Webster and Watson, and then we show the added value of Grounded Theory for rigorously analyzing a carefully chosen set of studies; it assures solidly legitimized, in-depth analyses of empirical facts and related insights. This includes, the emergence of new themes, issues and opportunities; interrelationships and dependencies in or beyond a particular area; as well as inconsistencies. If carried out meticulously, reviewing a well-carved out piece of literature by following this guide is likely to lead to more integrated and fruitful theory emergence, something that would enrich many fields in the social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Joost F Wolfswinkel & Elfi Furtmueller & Celeste P M Wilderom, 2013. "Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 45-55, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:45-55
    DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1057/ejis.2011.51
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/ejis.2011.51?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Vries, Jasper R. & Turner, James A. & Finlay-Smits, Susanna & Ryan, Alyssa & Klerkx, Laurens, 2022. "Trust in agri-food value chains: a systematic review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 26(2), November.
    2. Duan, Mimi & Li, Lingyan & Liu, Xiaojun & Pei, Jiajia & Song, Huihui, 2023. "Turning awareness into behavior: Meta-analysis of household residential life energy transition behavior from the dual perspective of internal driving forces and external inducing forces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    3. Carina Pasqualotto & Claudio Hoffmann Sampaio & Daniela Callegaro de Menezes, 2024. "Drivers and Barriers towards Circular Economy: A Systematic Review on Consumer Perspective in the Consumer Journey," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(6), pages 1-36, January.
    4. Kanika Goel & Wasana Bandara & Guy Gable, 2023. "Conceptualizing Business Process Standardization: A Review and Synthesis," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 195-237, June.
    5. Maximilian Julius Krome & Ulrich Pidun, 2023. "Conceptualization of research themes and directions in business ecosystem strategies: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 873-920, June.
    6. Kevin Friedrich, 2023. "A systematic literature review concerning the different interpretations of the role of sustainability in project management," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 31-60, February.
    7. Tenanoia Simona & Tauisi Taupo & Pedro Antunes, 2023. "A Scoping Review on Agency Collaboration in Emergency Management Based on the 3C Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 291-302, February.
    8. Matthias Fabian Gregersen Trischler & Jason Li-Ying, 2023. "Digital business model innovation: toward construct clarity and future research directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 3-32, January.
    9. Elia Pizzolitto & Ida Verna & Michelina Venditti, 2023. "Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 841-871, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjisxx:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:45-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.