IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v26y2025i1d10.1007_s40171-024-00419-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision Support Framework for Resilient and Sustainable Service Design

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Maruf Hossan Chowdhury

    (University of Technology Sydney)

  • Seyed Zeinab Aliahmadi

    (École de Technologie Supérieure, University of Québec)

  • Mohammed A. Quaddus

    (Curtin University)

  • Amir H. Ansaripoor

    (Curtin University)

  • Seyedali Mirjalili

    (Torrens University Australia
    VSB-Technical University of Ostrava)

Abstract

Resilient and sustainable service design is essential for ensuring the longevity and effectiveness of service systems. However, existing literature often neglects key aspects such as articulating resilience attributes and integrating sustainability dimensions. This study proposes a decision support model for a “resilient-sustainable service design” that merges service design principles with resilient system attributes and organizational sustainability goals. The framework incorporates a multi-objective mathematical programming model and a multi-phased Quality Function Deployment (QFD) approach to derive Pareto optimal solutions using the Brute Force algorithm. Applied in the m-health service sector in Bangladesh, the study reveals significant challenges, including limited awareness of services and logistical inefficiencies. To address these issues, flexible strategies such as demand planning and service innovation are implemented. The findings have direct implications for the improvement of service delivery processes and underscore the importance of considering both resilience and sustainability. While focusing on Bangladesh’s m-health sector, the insights gained have broader relevance globally. The integration of resilience and sustainability principles into service design is crucial for addressing complex challenges across sectors and regions. Future research could involve longitudinal studies to capture evolving resilience strategies and explore resilient-sustainable service systems from a broader perspective. This entails examining various factors such as technological advancements and socio-economic dynamics shaping resilient and sustainable service ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Seyed Zeinab Aliahmadi & Mohammed A. Quaddus & Amir H. Ansaripoor & Seyedali Mirjalili, 2025. "A Decision Support Framework for Resilient and Sustainable Service Design," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(1), pages 25-55, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00419-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-024-00419-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-024-00419-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-024-00419-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Higor Leite & Ian R. Hodgkinson, 2023. "Examining Resilience Across a Service Ecosystem under Crisis," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 690-709, April.
    2. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu, 2020. "Optimal regulation and sustainable product design under uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2022. "Stress testing supply chains and creating viable ecosystems," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 475-486, June.
    4. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2012. "An evolutionary framework for service innovation: Insights of complexity theory for service science," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 813-822.
    5. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2016. "A multi-phased QFD based optimization approach to sustainable service design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 165-178.
    6. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Priyabrata Chowdhury & Mohammed Quaddus & Kazi Waziur Rahman & Sakib Shahriar, 2024. "Flexibility in Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience: Developing a Resilience Capability Portfolio in the Event of Severe Disruption," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(2), pages 395-417, June.
    7. Salomée Ruel & Jamal El Baz & Dmitry Ivanov & Ajay Das, 2024. "Supply chain viability: conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1107-1136, April.
    8. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    9. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    10. Mona Haji & Frank Himpel, 2024. "Building Resilience in Food Security: Sustainable Strategies Post-COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Dmitry Ivanov, 2024. "Transformation of supply chain resilience research through the COVID-19 pandemic," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(23), pages 8217-8238, December.
    12. Derissen, Sandra & Quaas, Martin F. & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2011. "The relationship between resilience and sustainability of ecological-economic systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1121-1128, April.
    13. Chan, Lai-Kow & Wu, Ming-Lu, 2002. "Quality function deployment: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 463-497, December.
    14. Ali, Imran & Arslan, Ahmad & Chowdhury, Maruf & Khan, Zaheer & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2022. "Reimagining global food value chains through effective resilience to COVID-19 shocks and similar future events: A dynamic capability perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-12.
    15. Mohd. Nishat Faisal, 2013. "Managing Risk in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Supply Chains’ Using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Approach," International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 64-83, January.
    16. Ahmed Mohammed & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Ali Diabat, 2023. "COVID-19 pandemic disruption: a matter of building companies’ internal and external resilience," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(8), pages 2716-2737, April.
    17. Biswas, Debajyoti & Jalali, Hamed & Ansaripoor, Amir H. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2023. "Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: The implications of blockchain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 128-147.
    18. Alice Villar & Sarah Abowitz & Robert Read & James Butler, 2024. "Maximizing Supply Chain Resilience: Viability of a Distributed Manufacturing Network Platform Using the Open Knowledge Resilience Framework," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-41, June.
    19. Dmitry Ivanov, 2018. "Revealing interfaces of supply chain resilience and sustainability: a simulation study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3507-3523, May.
    20. Palash Saha & Subrata Talapatra & H. M. Belal & Victoria Jackson, 2022. "Unleashing the Potential of the TQM and Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainability Performance in the Context of a Developing Country," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 495-513, December.
    21. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    22. Veepan Kumar & Prem Vrat & Ravi Shankar, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Implementation of Industry 4.0 for Sustainability in Manufacturing," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 453-478, December.
    23. Kamar Zekhnini & Anass Cherrafi & Imane Bouhaddou & Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Surajit Bag, 2022. "A model integrating lean and green practices for viable, sustainable, and digital supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(21), pages 6529-6555, November.
    24. Ahmed Mohammed & Irina Harris & Anthony Soroka & Mohamed Naim & Tim Ramjaun & Morteza Yazdani, 2021. "Gresilient supplier assessment and order allocation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 335-362, January.
    25. Md Maruf Hossan Chowdhury & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Eijaz Ahmed Khan & A. K. M. Shakil Mahmud, 2024. "A Decision Support Model for Barriers and Optimal Strategy Design in Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chain Management," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 467-486, September.
    26. Benjamin McLellan & Qi Zhang & Hooman Farzaneh & N. Agya Utama & Keiichi N. Ishihara, 2012. "Resilience, Sustainability and Risk Management: A Focus on Energy," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-30, August.
    27. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexandre Dolgui, 2020. "Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2904-2915, May.
    28. A. Mohammed & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & A. Diabat, 2023. "COVID-19 Pandemic Disruption: A Matter of Building Companies' Internal and External Resilience," Post-Print hal-04276027, HAL.
    29. Eng Wolniak & A. Sȩdek, 2009. "Using QFD method for the ecological designing of products and services," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 695-701, July.
    30. Mozhu Wang & Jianming Yao, 2023. "Intertwined supply network design under facility and transportation disruption from the viability perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(8), pages 2513-2543, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed, Ahmed & Yazdani, Morteza & Govindan, Kannan & Chatterjee, Prasenjit & Hubbard, Nicolas, 2023. "Would your company’s resilience be internally viable after COVID-19 pandemic disruption?: A new PADRIC-based diagnostic methodology," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Abhijit Majumdar & Shefali Srivastava, 2025. "Building Resilience Through Flexibility to Mitigate Pandemic Disruption: A SAP–LAP Analysis of Textile and Clothing Supply Chain," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(1), pages 147-170, March.
    3. Chervenkova, Tanya & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Adaptation strategies for building supply chain viability: A case study analysis of the global automotive industry re-purposing during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Elena G. Popkova & Gulbakhyt Zh. Zholdasbekova & Anastasia A. Sozinova & Tatul Mkrtchyan & Bruno S. Sergi, 2024. "The Black Swan Theory Perspective and the Challenges of the COVID-19 Crisis as Catalysts for Managing a Business," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(1), pages 155-171, September.
    5. Kamar Zekhnini & Abla Chaouni Benabdellah & Anass Cherrafi, 2024. "A multi-agent based big data analytics system for viable supplier selection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(8), pages 3753-3773, December.
    6. Dmitry Ivanov, 2024. "Exiting the COVID-19 pandemic: after-shock risks and avoidance of disruption tails in supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1627-1644, April.
    7. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Intelligent digital twin (iDT) for supply chain stress-testing, resilience, and viability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    8. Sawik, Tadeusz, 2025. "Economically viable reshoring of supply chains under ripple effect," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    10. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    11. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    12. Samadhiya, Ashutosh & Yadav, Sanjeev & Kumar, Anil & Majumdar, Abhijit & Luthra, Sunil & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Upadhyay, Arvind, 2023. "The influence of artificial intelligence techniques on disruption management: Does supply chain dynamism matter?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    14. Cheng, Ru & Tao, Lei & Wang, Qiang & Zhao, Xiande, 2023. "The impact of value co-creation orientation on radical service innovation: Exploring a serial mediation mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    15. Chowdhury, Md. Maruf Hossan & Quaddus, Mohammed A., 2015. "A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh☆,☆☆☆This manuscript was pro," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 5-21.
    16. Yogita Swamy & Arun A. Elias & Matthew Pepper, 2023. "Post-Pandemic Resilience in the Pacific: A Research Agenda Linking Regional Supply Chains and Business Process Outsourcing in Fiji," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 65-75, December.
    17. Kristina Höse & Afonso Amaral & Uwe Götze & Paulo Peças, 2023. "Manufacturing Flexibility through Industry 4.0 Technological Concepts—Impact and Assessment," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 271-289, June.
    18. Ivanov, Dmitry, 2024. "Supply chain resilience: Conceptual and formal models drawing from immune system analogy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Zhu, Qingyun & Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2022. "Blockchain technology and supply chains: The paradox of the atheoretical research discourse," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Song-Man Wu & Hu-Chen Liu & Li-En Wang, 2017. "Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4436-4449, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:26:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00419-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.