IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/gjofsm/v25y2024i3d10.1007_s40171-024-00398-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Knowledge Management Processes by Strategic Management Accounting on Organizational Ambidexterity: Mediation of Operational Processes Under Environmental Dynamism

Author

Listed:
  • Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Rajeev Dwivedi

    (Eastern Washington University)

  • Marcio Quadros Lopes Santos

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Ronaldo Fragoso

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Anderson Costa Souza

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Fabio Henrique Sousa

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Wagner Argibe Pio Santos

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

  • Denise Souza Romboli

    (Mackenzie Presbyterian University)

Abstract

An important question for scholars and professionals is how knowledge management processes (KMP) supported by strategic management accounting (SMA) can strengthen operational processes (OPs) to enhance organizational ambidexterity (OA) in dynamic environments (ED). The empirical research utilizes knowledge management practices (KMPs) including knowledge generation, storage, and application/sharing to develop organizational performance (OP) and utilize organizational agility (OA) inside an environment of disruption (ED). The research involved surveying 203 Brazilian businesses and examining the assumptions through structural equation modeling. The findings showed that knowledge development and knowledge storage impact knowledge application and sharing. Knowledge application and sharing, as a strategic information system, impacts organizational ambidexterity by completely mediating organizational performance. Post hoc study revealed three enterprise clusters with varying levels of adoption of competitive orientation strategy, assistance from business partner accountants, and features of companies showing diverse knowledge management process roles on organizational performance and organizational ambidexterity under low and high environmental dynamism. The research results address gaps in information related to knowledge management procedures, strategic management accounting, and organizational ambidexterity literature, offering practical implications for professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Marcio Quadros Lopes Santos & Ronaldo Fragoso & Anderson Costa Souza & Fabio Henrique Sousa & Wagner Argibe Pio Santos & Denise Souza Romboli, 2024. "Effects of Knowledge Management Processes by Strategic Management Accounting on Organizational Ambidexterity: Mediation of Operational Processes Under Environmental Dynamism," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(3), pages 513-532, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00398-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40171-024-00398-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40171-024-00398-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40171-024-00398-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharmila Jayasingam & Mahfooz A Ansari & T Ramayah & Muhamad Jantan, 2013. "Knowledge management practices and performance: are they truly linked?," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 255-264, August.
    2. Radhakrishnan, Abirami & Zu, Xingxing & Grover, Varun, 2008. "A process-oriented perspective on differential business value creation by information technology: An empirical investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1105-1125, December.
    3. Md. Mamunur Rashid & Md. Mohobbot Ali & Dewan Mahboob Hossain, 2020. "Strategic management accounting practices: a literature review and opportunity for future research," Asian Journal of Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 109-132, November.
    4. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    5. Kim Langfield‐Smith, 2008. "Strategic management accounting: how far have we come in 25 years?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 204-228, February.
    6. Jafar Ojra & Abdullah Promise Opute & Mohammad Mobarak Alsolmi, 2021. "Strategic management accounting and performance implications: a literature review and research agenda," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Edimilson Costa Lucas, 2022. "The Effect of IS-Innovation Strategy Alignment on Corporate Performance: Investigating the Role of Environmental Uncertainty by Heterogeneity," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(07), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Akter, Shahriar, 2020. "The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Ragmoun Wided, 2023. "IT Capabilities, Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Resilience in SMEs Post-COVID-19: A Mediating and Moderating Role of Big Data Analytics Capabilities," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 123-142, March.
    10. Marta Peris-Ortiz & Dayanis García-Hurtado & Carlos Devece, 2019. "Influence of the balanced scorecard on the science and innovation performance of Latin American universities," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 373-383, October.
    11. Richard J. Arend & Y. Lisa Zhao & Michael Song & Subin Im, 2017. "Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(8), pages 1741-1752, August.
    12. Bernardo Gala-Velásquez & Américo Hurtado-Palomino & Angela Y. Arredondo-Salas, 2023. "Organisational Flexibility and Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Management Support," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 219-234, June.
    13. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    14. Jaflah Al-Ammary, 2014. "The Strategic Alignment between Knowledge Management and Information Systems Strategy: The Impact of Contextual and Cultural Factors," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 1-12.
    15. Peter Maik Hamann & Oliver Halw & Thomas W. Guenther, 2023. "Meta‐analysis of the corporate planning–organizational performance relationship: A research note," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7), pages 1803-1819, July.
    16. Pradeep Dwivedi & Jawaher Ibrahim Alabdooli & Rajeev Dwivedi, 2021. "Role of FinTech Adoption for Competitiveness and Performance of the Bank: A Study of Banking Industry in UAE," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 130-138, December.
    17. José Roberto Frega & Alex Antonio Ferraresi & Carlos Olavo Quandt & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2018. "Relationships Among Knowledge Management, Organisational Innovativeness and Performance: Covariance-Based Versus Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modelling," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Yolande E. Chan & James S. Denford & Joyce Y. Jin, 2016. "Competing Through Knowledge and Information Systems Strategies: A Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-37, September.
    19. Mikalef, Patrick & Pateli, Adamantia, 2017. "Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-16.
    20. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Edmilson Costa Lucas, 2021. "Knowledge Management Processes and Performance: Key Role of IS Strategies in Knowledge Capture and Utilisation," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-33, December.
    21. MacKenzie, Scott B. & Podsakoff, Philip M., 2012. "Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 542-555.
    22. Janet Kyogabiirwe Bagorogoza & Jaap van den Herik & Andrea de Waal & Bartel van de Walle, 2023. "The mediating effect of knowledge management in the relationship between the HPO framework and performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 73(4), pages 1167-1186, June.
    23. Yunyue Zhou & Chengli Shu & Wei Jiang & Shanxing Gao, 2019. "Green management, firm innovations, and environmental turbulence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 567-581, May.
    24. M. K. Dhillon & P. M. Rafi-Ul-Shan & H. Amar & F. Sher & S. Ahmed, 2023. "Flexible Green Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, March.
    25. Justin J. P. Jansen & Michiel P. Tempelaar & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 797-811, August.
    26. Murilo Catussi Almeida & Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Cláudio Luís Carvalho Larieira, 2022. "Do Leadership Styles Influence Employee Information Systems Security Intention? A Study of the Banking Industry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 535-550, December.
    27. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Machado, Marcio C., 2022. "Supply chain resilience in the UK during the coronavirus pandemic: A resource orchestration perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    28. Tanja Wolf & Michael Kuttner & Birgit Feldbauer-Durstmüller & Christine Mitter, 2020. "What we know about management accountants’ changing identities and roles – a systematic literature review," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 311-347, August.
    29. Pradeep Dwivedi & Rajeev Dwivedi & Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Bo Xie & B. Koteswar Rao Naik, 2023. "Role of Digitalization in Business Process to Reduce Manpower: A Case of Human Resource Management Process," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 66-76.
    30. Silvia Martelo-Landroguez & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2016. "How knowledge management processes can create and capture value for firms?," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 423-433, November.
    31. Rifat Kamasak & Ugur Yozgat & Meltem Yavuz, 2017. "Knowledge process capabilities and innovation: testing the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and strategic flexibility," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 356-368, August.
    32. Mahmoud M. Migdadi & Mohammed K. Abu Zaid & Mohammed Yousif & Ra’d Almestarihi & Khalil Al-Hyari, 2017. "An Empirical Examination of Knowledge Management Processes and Market Orientation, Innovation Capability, and Organisational Performance: Insights from Jordan," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-32, March.
    33. Adrianela Angeles & Adriana Perez-Encinas & Cristian E. Villanueva, 2022. "Characterizing Organizational Lifecycle through Strategic and Structural Flexibility: Insights from MSMEs in Mexico," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 271-290, June.
    34. Bo Karlsson & Anders Hersinger & Monika Kurkkio, 2019. "Hybrid accountants in the age of the business partner: exploring institutional drivers in a mining company," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 185-211, July.
    35. Rabab H. Saleh & Christopher M. Durugbo & Soud M. Almahamid, 2023. "What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 3013-3056, November.
    36. Lucas, Edimilson Costa & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley, 2018. "Impact of climate on firm value: Evidence from the electric power industry in Brazil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 359-368.
    37. Aydiner, Arafat Salih & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Bayraktar, Erkan & Zaim, Selim, 2019. "Information system capabilities and firm performance: Opening the black box through decision-making performance and business-process performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 168-182.
    38. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Alberto Luiz Albertin, 2018. "Effects of strategic information systems on competitive strategy and performance," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(9), pages 2018-2045, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & Rajeev Dwivedi & Ronaldo Gomes Dultra-de-Lima & Claudio Parisi & José Carlos Tiomatsu Oyadomari, 2023. "Role of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Information Systems for Achieving Strategic Flexibility through Decision-Making Performance: An Exploratory Study Based on North American and South American," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(2), pages 199-218, June.
    2. Yolande E. Chan & James S. Denford & Junjun Jane Wang, 2019. "The Co-Evolution of IT, Knowledge, and Agility in Micro and Small Enterprises," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-34, September.
    3. Dubey, Rameshwar & Bryde, David J. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Graham, Gary & Foropon, Cyril & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2023. "Dynamic digital capabilities and supply chain resilience: The role of government effectiveness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Monferrer, Diego & Moliner, Miguel Ángel & Irún, Beatriz & Estrada, Marta, 2021. "Network market and entrepreneurial orientations as facilitators of international performance in born globals. The mediating role of ambidextrous dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 430-443.
    5. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo Ricciardi Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2022. "How can Strategy-as-Practice Enable Innovation under the Influence of Environmental Dynamism?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(1), pages 200131-2001.
    6. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2021. "Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2111-2136, October.
    7. Rialti, Riccardo & Zollo, Lamberto & Ferraris, Alberto & Alon, Ilan, 2019. "Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Mirta Díaz & Susana Pasamar & Ramón Valle, 2012. "Are Ambidextrous Intellectual Capital and HRM Needed for an Ambidextrous Learning?," Working Papers 12.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Organization and Marketing (former Department of Business Administration).
    9. Wong, David T.W. & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2023. "The impact of advanced manufacturing technology, sensing and analytics capabilities, and planning comprehensiveness on sustained competitive advantage: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Sebastian Raisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Gilbert Probst & Michael L. Tushman, 2009. "Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 685-695, August.
    11. Lysander Weiss & Dominik Kanbach, 2022. "Toward an integrated framework of corporate venturing for organizational ambidexterity as a dynamic capability," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(4), pages 1129-1170, December.
    12. Zhang, Yixiang & Yang, Jialei & Liu, Meiling, 2022. "Enterprises’ energy-saving capability: Empirical study from a dynamic capability perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2020. "Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 363-372.
    14. Giorgi Shuradze & Yevgen Bogodistov & Heinz-Theo Wagner, 2018. "The Role Of Marketing-Enabled Data Analytics Capability And Organisational Agility For Innovation: Empirical Evidence From German Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-32, May.
    15. Samuel Fosso Wamba & Maciel M. Queiroz & Ilias O. Pappas & Yulia Sullivan, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Capability and Firm Performance: A Sustainable Development Perspective by the Mediating Role of Data-Driven Culture," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 2189-2203, December.
    16. Soumya Varma & Nitin Singh & Ajit Patra, 2024. "Supply Chain Flexibility: Unravelling the Research Trajectory Through Citation Path Analysis," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(2), pages 199-222, June.
    17. Murat Arslan & Huseyin Ince & Salih Zeki Imamoglu, 2024. "Effects of Standardized Innovation Management Systems on Innovation Ambidexterity and Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Canale, Fernanda & Müller, Claudio & Laveren, Eddy & Cambré, Bart, 2024. "The role of the family and the institutional context for ambidexterity in Latin American family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1).
    19. Chang, Yuan-Chieh & Yang, Phil Yihsing & Martin, Ben R. & Chi, Hui-Ru & Tsai-Lin, Tung-Fei, 2016. "Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 7-21.
    20. John Enrique Sánchez Otero & Jaider Manuel Vega Jurado & Joaquín Alegre Vidal, 2023. "Factors that Influence the Development of Innovations with a Social Focus in the Firm: A Systematic Literature Review," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 341-360, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:gjofsm:v:25:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40171-024-00398-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.