IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-025-00761-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design factors of the tag-based review summarization system: Perspective of the consumers’ intention to use

Author

Listed:
  • Han Yan

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

  • Rui Wang

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

  • Jin Qin

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

Abstract

The tag-based review summarization system (TBRSS) has been introduced and widely adopted by e-commerce platforms in recent years. However, limited research has been conducted to understand the design factors that influence consumers’ intention to use the system. Considering both the content and appearance attributes of the system, we developed an integrated model to investigate what affects consumers’ intention to use. The model combines both the content and appearance attributes of the factors and pathways. We used structural equation modeling (SEM) to analyse the 297 samples obtained through an online experiment. Results demonstrate that both the helpfulness of the tags’ content and the consistency between tags and original reviews positively influence the intention to use through information quality. Design aesthetics affects the intention to use through system quality. Moreover, our findings indicate that confidence in initial beliefs serves as an important moderating variable, exerting a positive influence on the relationship between information quality and intention to use.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Yan & Rui Wang & Jin Qin, 2025. "Design factors of the tag-based review summarization system: Perspective of the consumers’ intention to use," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00761-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00761-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-025-00761-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-025-00761-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janina Seutter & Kristin Kutzner & Maren Stadtländer & Dennis Kundisch & Ralf Knackstedt, 2023. "“Sorry, too much information”—Designing online review systems that support information search and processing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Zhang, Jason Q. & Craciun, Georgiana & Shin, Dongwoo, 2010. "When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1336-1341, December.
    3. Roggeveen, Anne L. & Grewal, Dhruv & Schweiger, Elisa B., 2020. "The DAST Framework for Retail Atmospherics: The Impact of In- and Out-of-Store Retail Journey Touchpoints on the Customer Experience," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 128-137.
    4. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    5. R. Filieri & E. Raguseo & C. Vitari, 2021. "Extremely Negative Ratings and Online Consumer Review Helpfulness: The Moderating Role of Product Quality Signals," Post-Print hal-04713689, HAL.
    6. Malhotra, Naresh K, 1984. "Reflections on the Information Overload Paradigm in Consumer Decision Making [Perspectives on Information Overload]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(4), pages 436-440, March.
    7. Hülya Karaman, 2021. "Online Review Solicitations Reduce Extremity Bias in Online Review Distributions and Increase Their Representativeness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4420-4445, July.
    8. Zhanfei Lei & Dezhi Yin & Han Zhang, 2021. "Focus Within or On Others: The Impact of Reviewers’ Attentional Focus on Review Helpfulness," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 801-819, September.
    9. Dezhi Yin & Triparna de Vreede & Logan M. Steele & Gert-Jan de Vreede, 2023. "Decide Now or Later: Making Sense of Incoherence Across Online Reviews," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1211-1227, September.
    10. Barbara H. Wixom & Peter A. Todd, 2005. "A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 85-102, March.
    11. Filieri, Raffaele & Lin, Zhibin & Pino, Giovanni & Alguezaui, Salma & Inversini, Alessandro, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-675.
    12. Rajat Kumar Behera & Pradip Kumar Bala & Arghya Ray, 2024. "Cognitive Chatbot for Personalised Contextual Customer Service: Behind the Scene and beyond the Hype," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 899-919, June.
    13. R. Filieri & Z. Lin & G. Pino & S. Alguezaui & A. Inversini, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Post-Print hal-04779114, HAL.
    14. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    15. Gupta, Pranjal & Harris, Judy, 2010. "How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1041-1049, September.
    16. Bigne, Enrique & Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi & Ruiz, Carla, 2020. "Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 403-416.
    17. Agrebi, Sinda & Jallais, Joël, 2015. "Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 16-23.
    18. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    19. Dezhi Yin & Sabyasachi Mitra & Han Zhang, 2016. "Research Note—When Do Consumers Value Positive vs. Negative Reviews? An Empirical Investigation of Confirmation Bias in Online Word of Mouth," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 131-144, March.
    20. Valérian Chambon & Héloïse Théro & Marie Vidal & Henri Vandendriessche & Patrick Haggard & Stefano Palminteri, 2020. "Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 1067-1079, October.
    21. Choi-Meng Leong & Alexa Min-Wei Loi & Steve Woon, 2022. "The influence of social media eWOM information on purchase intention," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(2), pages 145-157, June.
    22. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    23. JaeHong Park & Prabhudev Konana & Bin Gu & Alok Kumar & Rajagopal Raghunathan, 2013. "Information Valuation and Confirmation Bias in Virtual Communities: Evidence from Stock Message Boards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1050-1067, December.
    24. Kamal, Syeda Ayesha & Shafiq, Muhammad & Kakria, Priyanka, 2020. "Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Yang Liu & Xingchen Ding & Maomao Chi & Jiang Wu & Lili Ma, 2024. "Assessing the helpfulness of hotel reviews for information overload: a multi-view spatial feature approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 59-87, March.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2723 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Wanshu Niu & Liqiang Huang & Xixi Li & Jie Zhang & Mingliang Chen, 2023. "Beyond the review information: an investigation of individual- and group-based presentation forms of review information," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 159-176, June.
    5. Ronald T. Cenfetelli & Andrew Schwarz, 2011. "Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 808-823, December.
    6. Wen-Lung Shiau & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2013. "Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(3), pages 1317-1337, March.
    7. Eva Chen & Ilka Weber, 2010. "To Discount or Not to Discount: An Assessment of Perceptions, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Electronic Auctions with Discounts," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 127-148, March.
    8. Lutz, Bernhard & Pröllochs, Nicolas & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 888-901.
    9. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    10. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    11. Nitin Walia & Mark Srite & Wendy Huddleston, 2016. "Eyeing the web interface: the influence of price, product, and personal involvement," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-333, September.
    12. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    13. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    14. Turel, Ofir & Connelly, Catherine E., 2013. "Too busy to help: Antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 674-683.
    15. Judy E. Scott & Dawn G. Gregg & Jae Hoon Choi, 2015. "Lemon complaints: When online auctions go sour," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 177-191, February.
    16. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    17. Jianhong Gan & Si Shi & Raffaele Filieri & Wilson K.S. Leung, 2023. "Short video marketing and travel intentions: The interplay between visual perspective, visual content, and narration appeal," Post-Print hal-04779129, HAL.
    18. Jung Lee & Jae-Nam Lee & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2015. "Antecedents of cognitive trust and affective distrust and their mediating roles in building customer loyalty," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 159-175, February.
    19. Yoon, Hyun Shik & Occeña, Luis G., 2015. "Influencing factors of trust in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce with gender and age," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 352-363.
    20. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    21. Ilham Hidayah Napitupulu, 2023. "Internal Control, Manager’s Competency, Management Accounting Information Systems and Good Corporate Governance: Evidence from Rural Banks in Indonesia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(3), pages 563-585, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tag-based review summarization system; E-commerce; Online review; Review summarization; Initial belief;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-025-00761-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.