IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04582457.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

MetaWOM – toward a sensory word-of-mouth (WOM) in the metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • D. Mladenovic
  • E. Ismagilova
  • R. Filieri

    (Audencia Business School)

  • Y. Dwivedi

Abstract

Purpose Based on the key dimensions of the Metaverse environment (immersiveness, fidelity and sociability), this paper aims to develop the concept of sensory word-of-mouth (WOM) in Metaverse – the metaWOM. It attempts to upgrade the Reviewchain model and suggests the utilization of non-transferable tokens (NTTs) in curbing the explosion of fake WOM. Design/methodology/approach Following Macinnis' (2011) approach to conceptual contributions, the authors browsed the currently available literature on WOM, Metaverse and NTT to portray the emergence of metaWOM. Findings By relying on Metaverse's three building blocks, the authors map out the persuasiveness of metaWOM in the Metaverse-like environment. By incorporating NTT in the Reviewchain model, the authors upgraded it to provide a transparent, safe and trusted review ecosystem. An array of emerging research directions and research questions is presented. Research limitations/implications This paper comprehensively analyzes the implications of a Metaverse-like environment on WOM and debates on technologies that can enhance the metaWOM persuasiveness. The proposed model in this paper can assist various stakeholders in understanding the complex nature of virtual information-seeking and giving. Originality/value This is the original attempt to delineate the sensory aspect of WOM in the Metaverse based on three crucial aspects of the Metaverse environment: immersiveness, fidelity and sociability. This paper extends the discussion on the issue of fake reviews and offers viable suggestions to curb the ever-growing number of fraudulent WOM.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Mladenovic & E. Ismagilova & R. Filieri & Y. Dwivedi, 2024. "MetaWOM – toward a sensory word-of-mouth (WOM) in the metaverse," Post-Print hal-04582457, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04582457
    DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-04-2023-0474
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04582457v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04582457v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2023-0474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giang Barrera, Kevin & Shah, Denish, 2023. "Marketing in the Metaverse: Conceptual understanding, framework, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    2. Román, Sergio & Riquelme, Isabel P. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2023. "Fake or credible? Antecedents and consequences of perceived credibility in exaggerated online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Maity, Moutusy & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2018. "The impact of media richness on consumer information search and choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 36-45.
    4. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    5. A. Koohang & J.H. Nord & K.-B. Ooi & G.W.-H. Tan & M. Al-Emran & E.C.-X. Aw & A.M. Baabdullah & D. Buhalis & T.-H. Cham & C. Dennis & Vincent Dutot & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & L. Hughes & E. Mogaji & N. Pan, 2023. "Shaping the Metaverse into Reality: A Holistic Multidisciplinary Understanding of Opportunities, Challenges, and Avenues for Future Investigation," Post-Print hal-04292613, HAL.
    6. Javornik, Ana & Duffy, Katherine & Rokka, Joonas & Scholz, Joachim & Nobbs, Karinna & Motala, Anisa & Goldenberg, Adriana, 2021. "Strategic approaches to augmented reality deployment by luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 284-292.
    7. R. Filieri & F. Acikgoz & D. Hao, 2023. "Electronic word-of-mouth from video bloggers: The role of content quality and source homophily across hedonic and utilitarian products," Post-Print hal-04713695, HAL.
    8. Scholz, Joachim & Smith, Andrew N., 2016. "Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 149-161.
    9. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Lee, Ki Hoon, 2021. "Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 552-563.
    10. Yilmaz, Tuba & Sagfossen, Sofie & Velasco, Carlos, 2023. "What makes NFTs valuable to consumers? Perceived value drivers associated with NFTs liking, purchasing, and holding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Zeng, Guojun & Cao, Xinning & Lin, Zhibin & Xiao, Sarah H., 2020. "When online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. R. Filieri & Z. Lin & G. Pino & S. Alguezaui & A. Inversini, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Post-Print hal-04779114, HAL.
    13. Belk, Russell & Humayun, Mariam & Brouard, Myriam, 2022. "Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and Wild Markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 198-205.
    14. Flavián, Carlos & Ibáñez-Sánchez, Sergio & Orús, Carlos, 2019. "The impact of virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 547-560.
    15. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    16. Verma, Deepak & Prakash Dewani, Prem & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Dwivedi, Yogesh & Del Giudice, Manilo, 2023. "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of eWOM credibility: Investigation of moderating role of culture and platform type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Filieri, Raffaele, 2016. "What makes an online consumer review trustworthy?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 46-64.
    18. Filieri, Raffaele & Lin, Zhibin & Pino, Giovanni & Alguezaui, Salma & Inversini, Alessandro, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-675.
    19. Filieri, Raffaele & Acikgoz, Fulya & Du, Hao, 2023. "Electronic word-of-mouth from video bloggers: The role of content quality and source homophily across hedonic and utilitarian products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Pandey, Neeraj & Pandey, Nitesh & Mishra, Akanksha, 2021. "Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 758-773.
    21. Banerjee, Snehasish, 2022. "Exaggeration in fake vs. authentic online reviews for luxury and budget hotels," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nadeem, Waqar & Ashraf, Abdul Rehman & Shahid, Shadma, 2025. "What drives metaverse retail environments (non)usage? A behavioral reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mladenović, Dušan & Bruni, Roberto & Filieri, Raffaele & Ismagilova, Elvira & Kalia, Prateek & Jirásek, Michal, 2024. "The power of electronic Word of Mouth in inducing adoption of emerging technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Pooja Katyal & Reetika Sehgal, 2025. "Unraveling the impact of online consumer reviews on consumer buying behavior," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 330-345, January.
    3. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    4. Harrison-Walker, L. Jean & Jiang, Ying, 2023. "Suspicion of online product reviews as fake: Cues and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    5. Mukta Srivastava & S. Abhishek & Neeraj Pandey, 2025. "Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) and customer brand engagement (CBE): Do they really go hand-in-hand?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1865-1933, June.
    6. Barta, Sergio & Gurrea, Raquel & Flavián, Carlos, 2023. "Consequences of consumer regret with online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Liu, Hongfei & Jayawardhena, Chanaka & Shukla, Paurav & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie & Yoganathan, Vignesh, 2024. "Electronic word of mouth 2.0 (eWOM 2.0) – The evolution of eWOM research in the new age," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Filieri, Raffaele & Acikgoz, Fulya & Du, Hao, 2023. "Electronic word-of-mouth from video bloggers: The role of content quality and source homophily across hedonic and utilitarian products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Kostyk, Alena & Sheng, Jie, 2023. "VR in customer-centered marketing: Purpose-driven design," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 225-236.
    10. Agag, Gomaa & Ali Durrani, Baseer & Hassan Abdelmoety, Ziad & Mostafa Daher, Maya & Eid, Riyad, 2024. "Understanding the link between net promoter score and e-WOM behaviour on social media: The role of national culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Han Yan & Rui Wang & Jin Qin, 2025. "Design factors of the tag-based review summarization system: Perspective of the consumers’ intention to use," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Kumar, Sanjeev & Rajaguru, Rajesh & Yang, Lin, 2024. "Investigating how brand image and attitude mediate consumer susceptibility to eWOM and purchase intention: Comparing enterprise-owned vs. third-party online review websites using multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2024. "How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Onofrei, George & Filieri, Raffaele & Kennedy, Lorraine, 2022. "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-112.
    15. Kim, Yuna, 2025. "Not just for play: Why the metaverse should be leveraged for cocreation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 45-54.
    16. Singh, Gaganpreet & Roy, Sanjit K. & Apostolidis, Chrysostomos & Quaddus, Mohammed & Sadeque, Saalem, 2025. "Identifying the metaverse value recipe(s) affecting customer engagement and well-being in retailing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    17. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    18. Hu, Lala & Olivieri, Mirko & Giovannetti, Marta & Cedrola, Elena, 2025. "The retail strategies of luxury fashion firms in the metaverse: Enhancing brand experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Giang Barrera, Kevin & Shah, Denish, 2023. "Marketing in the Metaverse: Conceptual understanding, framework, and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    20. Kashyap, Abhishek & Shukla, Om Ji & Kumar, Rupesh & Alam, Md Mahmudul & Oberoi, Sarbjit Singh, 2025. "Online retailing and the metaverse: Addressing stakeholder impediments in e-commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04582457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.