IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infott/v26y2024i1d10.1007_s40558-023-00280-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the helpfulness of hotel reviews for information overload: a multi-view spatial feature approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xingchen Ding

    (Wuhan University)

  • Maomao Chi

    (China University of Geosciences)

  • Jiang Wu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Lili Ma

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Consumer perceptions of helpfulness remain an open question due to the lack of semantic and spatial features of review content. This paper aims to explore three aspects of the contents of a review: time, rating, and location, to assess the helpfulness of hotel reviews. A multi-view graph convolutional network (MVGCN) and attention mechanisms that capture multimodal semantic information are designed. The experimental results on Yelp and TripAdvisor are evaluated. The findings indicate that this facilitates the filtering of helpful information and avoids information overload when reading to customers. The results show that the proposed model outperforms the baseline and illustrates the interpretability of the models in each view. Our work is essential for professionals of both hotel and travel platforms that can utilize our findings to optimize their sales systems. Also, the results can help visitors or users acquire beneficial information and avoid information overload. This study is one of the few articles that can promote a model interpretable for information overload, which aims to guide research on evaluating the helpfulness of reviews in the hotel sector. This study contributes also to the methodology by developing extracting features of multimodal data, giving a multi-view feature with several novel assessments, and a novel framework involving deep learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Xingchen Ding & Maomao Chi & Jiang Wu & Lili Ma, 2024. "Assessing the helpfulness of hotel reviews for information overload: a multi-view spatial feature approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 59-87, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00280-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s40558-023-00280-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40558-023-00280-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40558-023-00280-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Fang & Karimi, Sahar, 2019. "This product works well (for me): The impact of first-person singular pronouns on online review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 283-294.
    2. R. Filieri & Fraser Mcleay & Bruce Tsui & Zhibin Lin, 2018. "Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention in online consumer reviews of services," Post-Print hal-04779103, HAL.
    3. Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2017. "The Effect of Brand on the Impact of e-WOM on Hotels’ Financial Performance," Post-Print halshs-01656399, HAL.
    4. Hu, Ya-Han & Chen, Kuanchin, 2016. "Predicting hotel review helpfulness: The impact of review visibility, and interaction between hotel stars and review ratings," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 929-944.
    5. Christopher P. Furner & Robert A. Zinko, 2017. "The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: an empirical investigation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(3), pages 211-224, August.
    6. Xiang, Zheng & Du, Qianzhou & Ma, Yufeng & Fan, Weiguo, 2017. "A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 51-65.
    7. Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2017. "The Effect of Brand on the Impact of e-WOM on Hotels’ Financial Performance," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-02013751, HAL.
    8. Bin Guo & Shasha Zhou, 2017. "What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 585-608, December.
    9. Yang Liu & Qingguo Zeng & Bobo Li & Lili Ma & Joaquín Ordieres‐Meré, 2022. "Anticipating financial distress of high‐tech startups in the European Union: A machine learning approach for imbalanced samples," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 1131-1155, September.
    10. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    11. Lutz, Bernhard & Pröllochs, Nicolas & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 888-901.
    12. Zhang, Jason Q. & Craciun, Georgiana & Shin, Dongwoo, 2010. "When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(12), pages 1336-1341, December.
    13. Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2017. "The Effect of Brand on the Impact of e-WOM on Hotels’ Financial Performance," Post-Print hal-02013751, HAL.
    14. Hu, Han-fen & Krishen, Anjala S., 2019. "When is enough, enough? Investigating product reviews and information overload from a consumer empowerment perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 27-37.
    15. R. Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2019. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print hal-04779104, HAL.
    16. Malhotra, Naresh K, 1984. "Reflections on the Information Overload Paradigm in Consumer Decision Making [Perspectives on Information Overload]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(4), pages 436-440, March.
    17. Robert Zinko & Paul Stolk & Zhan Furner & Brad Almond, 2020. "A picture is worth a thousand words: how images influence information quality and information load in online reviews," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 775-789, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Yani Wang & Jun Wang & Tang Yao, 2019. "What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 257-284, June.
    4. Pooja Katyal & Reetika Sehgal, 2025. "Unraveling the impact of online consumer reviews on consumer buying behavior," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 330-345, January.
    5. Filieri, Raffaele & Lin, Zhibin & Pino, Giovanni & Alguezaui, Salma & Inversini, Alessandro, 2021. "The role of visual cues in eWOM on consumers’ behavioral intention and decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 663-675.
    6. Lutz, Bernhard & Pröllochs, Nicolas & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Are longer reviews always more helpful? Disentangling the interplay between review length and line of argumentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 888-901.
    7. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    8. Yi Feng & Yunqiang Yin & Dujuan Wang & Lalitha Dhamotharan & Joshua Ignatius & Ajay Kumar, 2023. "Diabetic patient review helpfulness: unpacking online drug treatment reviews by text analytics and design science approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 387-418, September.
    9. Han Yan & Rui Wang & Jin Qin, 2025. "Design factors of the tag-based review summarization system: Perspective of the consumers’ intention to use," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Manuel Rodríguez-Díaz & Raquel Alonso-González & Crina Isabel Rodríguez-Voltes & Ana Cristina Rodríguez-Voltes, 2019. "A Rating of the Online Reputation Balance in Lodgings," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Alshawawreh, Ali Ra’Ed & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of big data analytics on telecom companies' competitive advantage," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    12. Juan Pedro Mellinas & Eva Martin-Fuentes, 2019. "Does hotel size matter to get more reviews per room?," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 165-180, June.
    13. Osterbrink Lars & Alpar Paul & Seher Alexander, 2020. "Influence of Images in Online Reviews for Search Goods on Helpfulness," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 43-73, September.
    14. Muhammad Bilal & Abdulwahab Ali Almazroi, 2023. "Effectiveness of Fine-tuned BERT Model in Classification of Helpful and Unhelpful Online Customer Reviews," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2737-2757, December.
    15. Rachita Kashyap & Ankit Kesharwani & Abhilash Ponnam, 2023. "Measurement of online review helpfulness: a formative measure development and validation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2183-2216, December.
    16. Benedikt M. Brand & Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin & Theresa Maria Rausch, 2022. "Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1039-1060, September.
    17. Janina Seutter & Kristin Kutzner & Maren Stadtländer & Dennis Kundisch & Ralf Knackstedt, 2023. "“Sorry, too much information”—Designing online review systems that support information search and processing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Pietro Pavone & Guido Migliaccio & Biagio Simonetti, 2023. "Investigating financial statements in hospitality: a quantitative approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 383-407, October.
    19. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Sunyoung Hlee & Hanna Lee & Chulmo Koo, 2018. "Hospitality and Tourism Online Review Research: A Systematic Analysis and Heuristic-Systematic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infott:v:26:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s40558-023-00280-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.