IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v35y2025i1d10.1007_s12525-024-00749-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does innovation emerge in open platform ecosystems?

Author

Listed:
  • María J. Quero

    (University of Málaga)

  • Montserrat Díaz-Méndez

    (University of Extremadura)

  • Jose L. Ruiz-Alba

    (University of Málaga and University of Westminster)

Abstract

New collaborative contexts like open platforms represent a growing area in which the institutions are questioned and, in some cases, challenged (de-institutionalized) as part of a process that drives market innovation, allowing for ecosystem self-adjustment. This research investigates the underlying processes of change and evolution linked to innovation in the arts crowdfunding ecosystem context from an institutional point of view and connects the de-institutionalization process with the capability of a system to rely on the actors to make it possible for the ecosystem to evolve and create new institutions as a result of the interplay and institutional work. This paper addresses a gap in innovation emergence in service ecosystems, shedding light on the role of the de-institutionalization process as a path for inducing disruption relying on actors’ co-creation to make the system adjust and evolve through the emergence of new network practices.

Suggested Citation

  • María J. Quero & Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Jose L. Ruiz-Alba, 2025. "How does innovation emerge in open platform ecosystems?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00749-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-024-00749-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-024-00749-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-024-00749-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens Poeppelbuss & Martin Ebel & Jürgen Anke, 2022. "Iterative uncertainty reduction in multi-actor smart service innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 599-627, June.
    2. W. Creed & Steven Taylor & Bryant Ashley Hudson, 2020. "Institutional Aesthetics: Embodied Ways of Encountering, Evaluating, and Enacting Institutions," Post-Print hal-02511020, HAL.
    3. Scaringella, Laurent & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2018. "Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 59-87.
    4. Cayetano Medina-Molina & Manuel Rey-Moreno & J. Augusto Felício & Inmaculada Romano Paguillo, 2019. "Participation in crowdfunding among users of collaborative platforms: the role of innovativeness and social capital," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 529-543, June.
    5. María José Quero & Rafael Ventura & Carol Kelleher, 2017. "Value-in-context in crowdfunding ecosystems: how context frames value co-creation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(2), pages 405-425, June.
    6. Markus Giesler, 2008. "Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(6), pages 739-753, August.
    7. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Stephen L. Vargo, 2021. "Formalizing service-dominant logic as a general theory of markets: taking stock and moving forward," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 375-389, December.
    8. Gilliland, David I. & Rudd, John M., 2013. "Control of electronic channel affiliates: An exploratory study and research propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2650-2656.
    9. Simon Michalke & Lisa Lohrenz & Christoph Lattemann & Susanne Robra-Bissantz, 2022. "Exploring engagement, well-being, and welfare on engagement platforms: Insight into the personal service sector from the DACH region," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2429-2444, December.
    10. R. Srinivasan, 2021. "Platform Business Models," Management for Professionals, Springer, number 978-981-16-2838-2, March.
    11. Gregor Dorfleitner & Lars Hornuf & Martina Weber, 2018. "Dynamics of investor communication in equity crowdfunding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(4), pages 523-540, November.
    12. Magnani, Giovanna & Gioia, Denny, 2023. "Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    13. Rotem Shneor & Urszula Mrzygłód & Joanna Adamska-Mieruszewska & Anna Fornalska-Skurczyńska, 2022. "The role of social trust in reward crowdfunding campaigns’ design and success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1103-1118, September.
    14. Juho Hamari & Mimmi Sjöklint & Antti Ukkonen, 2016. "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(9), pages 2047-2059, September.
    15. Korkman, Oskar & Storbacka, Kaj & Harald, Bo, 2010. "Practices as markets: Value co-creation in e-invoicing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 236-247.
    16. Stephen L. Vargo & Linda Peters & Hans Kjellberg & Kaisa Koskela-Huotari & Suvi Nenonen & Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Claudia Vaughan, 2023. "Emergence in marketing: an institutional and ecosystem framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 2-22, January.
    17. Peters, Linda D., 2016. "Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2999-3007.
    18. Storbacka, Kaj & Brodie, Roderick J. & Böhmann, Tilo & Maglio, Paul P. & Nenonen, Suvi, 2016. "Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3008-3017.
    19. Polese, Francesco & Payne, Adrian & Frow, Pennie & Sarno, Debora & Nenonen, Suvi, 2021. "Emergence and phase transitions in service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 25-34.
    20. Patrycja Klimas & Wojciech Czakon, 2022. "Species in the wild: a typology of innovation ecosystems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 249-282, January.
    21. Mixon Jr., Franklin G. & Asarta, Carlos J. & Caudill, Steven B., 2017. "Patreonomics: Public goods pedagogy for economics principles," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-7.
    22. Jerald Hage & Jonathon Mote & Gretchen Jordan, 2013. "Ideas, innovations, and networks: a new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(2), pages 199-216, June.
    23. Xiaoxu Zhang & Linchao Yang & Tianyu Gao & Wenyong Zhou, 2024. "The coordination mechanism of value co-creation between developers and users in digital innovation ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-18, December.
    24. Sara Martins Gonçalves & Rui Vinhas Silva, 2021. "Discussing the potential of the institutional theory to leverage service-dominant logic advancements," European Journal of Management Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(1), pages 3-16, July.
    25. Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa & Edvardsson, Bo & Jonas, Julia M. & Sörhammar, David & Witell, Lars, 2016. "Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2964-2971.
    26. Alessandro Zardini & Francesca Ricciardi & Ludovico Bullini Orlandi & Cecilia Rossignoli, 2020. "Business networks as breeding grounds for entrepreneurial options: organizational implications," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1029-1046, October.
    27. Paulin Gohoungodji & Nabil Amara, 2023. "Art of innovating in the arts: definitions, determinants, and mode of innovation in creative industries, a systematic review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(8), pages 2685-2725, November.
    28. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thompson-Whiteside, Helen & Fletcher-Brown, Judith & Middleton, Karen & Turnbull, Sarah, 2023. "Emergence in emergency: How actors adapt to service ecosystem disruption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Torres Pena, Maria Veronica & Breidbach, Christoph F., 2021. "On emergence in service platforms: An application to P2P lending," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 337-347.
    3. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Smyth, Hedley J., 2019. "Multiplex value cocreation in unique service exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-286.
    4. Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Chandler, Jennifer D. & Mele, Cristina, 2023. "Service ecosystem boundary and boundary work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Hunter-Jones, Philippa, 2021. "Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Lusch, Robert F. & Vargo, Stephen L. & Gustafsson, Anders, 2016. "Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2957-2963.
    8. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    9. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka, 2021. "Market-shaping: navigating multiple theoretical perspectives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 336-353, December.
    10. Schulz, Thomas & Zimmermann, Sina & Böhm, Markus & Gewald, Heiko & Krcmar, Helmut, 2021. "Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems: The case of the Reach Now app," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Tian, Chao & Tu, Kai & Sui, Haiqing & Sun, Qi, 2024. "Value co-creation in shared mobility: The case of carpooling in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Helkkula, Anu & Arnould, Eric J., 2022. "Using neo-animism to revisit actors for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in S-D logic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 860-868.
    13. Thomas Schulz & Markus Böhm & Heiko Gewald & Helmut Krcmar, 2021. "Smart mobility – an analysis of potential customers’ preference structures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 105-124, March.
    14. Jens Poeppelbuss & Martin Ebel & Jürgen Anke, 2022. "Iterative uncertainty reduction in multi-actor smart service innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 599-627, June.
    15. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Dyussembayeva, Shynar & Mifsud, Matthieu & Hollebeek, Linda D., 2023. "Engagement and value cocreation within a multi-stakeholder service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Yar Hamidi, Daniel & Machold, Silke, 2020. "Governance, boards and value co-creation: Changing perspectives towards a service dominant logic," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 956-966.
    17. Becker, Larissa & Karpen, Ingo Oswald & Kleinaltenkamp, Michael & Jaakkola, Elina & Helkkula, Anu & Nuutinen, Maaria, 2023. "Actor experience: Bridging individual and collective-level theorizing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Shan Jayasinghe & Lester Johnson & Chandana Hewege & Chamila Perera, 2022. "Defining Firm-Level Resource Integration Effectiveness from the Perspective of Service-Dominant Logic: A Critical Factor Contributing to the Sustainability of a Firm’s Competitive Advantage and the Ec," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Dickinger, Astrid & Kolomoyets, Yuliya, 2024. "Value co-creation in tourism living labs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Simmonds, Hamish & Gazley, Aaron & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Renton, Michelle & Hooper, Val, 2021. "Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public sector digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 100-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutions; Multi-sided platforms; Innovation ecosystems; Crowdfunding;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:35:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12525-024-00749-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.