IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v169y2023ics0148296323006173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Chu-Heng
  • Hsieh, Ming-Huei

Abstract

Drawing on service-dominant logic’s institutional view of market innovation, this study investigated how the institutional reconciliation of institutional complexity at the individual level affects market innovation. Two case studies of product introductions were analyzed to determine how actors maintain prevailing institutional arrangements, adopt new institutional arrangements associated with firms’ value propositions, and create novel institutional arrangements. The results suggest that actors undergo an institutional reconciliation process comprising three stages—namely: engaging in reflexivity, mobilizing resources, and normalizing practices; notably, this process is recursive until actors align all practices with an institutional arrangement and these practices are routinized and reproducible, although this depends on institutional complexity. The results also revealed that different approaches to reconciling multiple incompatible institutional arrangements across contexts at the micro level impact the emergence of macro-level market innovation. Ultimately, these findings shed light on the uncertain outcomes of market innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Chu-Heng & Hsieh, Ming-Huei, 2023. "Market innovation as an institutional reconciliation process: Two individual-level case studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323006173
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296323006173
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:169:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323006173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.