IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/doi10.1086-672358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing the Game: Assessing the Impact of Cultural Representations on Consumer Perceptions of Legitimacy

Author

Listed:
  • Ashlee Humphreys
  • Kathryn A. Latour

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to understand how media frames affect consumer judgments of legitimacy. Because frames exist on the sociocultural and individual level, our research takes a multimethod approach to this question. On the sociocultural level, we conduct a content analysis of operant media frames for discussing online gambling and perform an event analysis, finding that a shift in consumer judgments follows an abrupt shift in frame. Then, on the individual level, the causal mechanism for these shifts is investigated in an experimental setting using the Implicit Association Test (IAT). These experiments show that framing affects normative legitimacy judgments by changing implicit associations. Further, users and nonusers respond differently to frame elements, with users favoring an established frame and nonusers favoring a novel, legitimating frame. This suggests that media frames play a critical role in establishing legitimacy at the sociocultural level and that framing potentially bridges cognitive and normative legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashlee Humphreys & Kathryn A. Latour, 2013. "Framing the Game: Assessing the Impact of Cultural Representations on Consumer Perceptions of Legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 773-795.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/672358
    DOI: 10.1086/672358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/672358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/672358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mendoza, Mario A. & Rodriguez Alfonso, Mauricio & Lhuillery, Stephane, 2021. "A battle of drones: Utilizing legitimacy strategies for the transfer and diffusion of dual-use technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Fong, Cher-Min & Chang, Hsing-Hua Stella & Lin, Mong-Ching & Chen, I-Hung, 2022. "Reexamining emerging market animosity toward western developed countries: A social dilemma in physical retailing consumption under normative influence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Ben Slimane, Karim & Chaney, Damien & Humphreys, Ashlee & Leca, Bernard, 2019. "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 389-394.
    4. Chaney, Damien & Lunardo, Renaud & Bressolles, Grégory, 2016. "Making the store a place of learning: The effects of in-store educational activities on retailer legitimacy and shopping intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5886-5893.
    5. Kate Barclay & Alice Miller, 2018. "The Sustainable Seafood Movement Is a Governance Concert, with the Audience Playing a Key Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Chaney, Damien & Lunardo, Renaud & Saintives, Camille, 2015. "In-store quality (in)congruency as a driver of perceived legitimacy and shopping behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 51-59.
    7. Clauzel, Amélie & Delacour, Hélène & Liarte, Sébastien, 2019. "When cuisine becomes less haute: The impact of expert ratings on consumers' legitimacy judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 395-404.
    8. Slater, Stephanie & Demangeot, Catherine, 2021. "Marketer acculturation to diversity needs: The case of modest fashion across two multicultural contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 702-715.
    9. Amélie Clauzel & Hélène Delacour & Sébastien Liarte, 2019. "When cuisine becomes less haute : The impact of expert ratings on consumers' legitimacy judgments," Post-Print hal-02513471, HAL.
    10. Weiquan Wang & Jingjun (David) Xu & May Wang, 2018. "Effects of Recommendation Neutrality and Sponsorship Disclosure on Trust vs. Distrust in Online Recommendation Agents: Moderating Role of Explanations for Organic Recommendations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5198-5219, November.
    11. Stephanie Slater & Catherine Demangeot, 2021. "Marketer acculturation to diversity needs: The case of modest fashion across two multicultural contexts," Post-Print hal-03600360, HAL.
    12. Aruna Jha & Madhavi Kapoor & Nidhi, 2023. "Can One Size Fit All: A Multi-group Analysis of Indian Corporates," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(4), pages 535-559, December.
    13. Jianhong Zhang & David L. Deephouse & Désirée van Gorp & Haico Ebbers, 2022. "Individuals’ Perceptions of the Legitimacy of Emerging Market Multinationals: Ethical Foundations and Construct Validation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 801-825, April.
    14. Young Woong Park & Glenn B. Voss & Zannie Giraud Voss, 2023. "Advancing customer diversity, equity, and inclusion: Measurement, stakeholder influence, and the role of marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 174-197, January.
    15. Qiong Yao & Liwen Huang & Mingli Li, 2019. "The effects of tech and non-tech innovation on brand equity in China: The role of institutional environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, May.
    16. Steven Shepherd & Ted Matherly, 2021. "Racialization of peer‐to‐peer transactions: Inequality and barriers to legitimacy," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 417-444, June.
    17. Wiart, Lucie & Özçağlar-Toulouse, Nil & Shaw, Deirdre, 2022. "Maintaining market legitimacy: A discursive-hegemonic perspective on meat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 391-402.
    18. Patrick Haack & Oliver Schilke & Lynne Zucker, 2021. "Legitimacy Revisited: Disentangling Propriety, Validity, and Consensus," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 749-781, May.
    19. Thabo Gerald Maleka & Gibson Nyirenda & Michael Bamidele Fakoya, 2017. "The Relationship between Waste Management Expenditure and Waste Reduction Targets on Selected JSE Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    20. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:904-925. is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Alain Debenedetti & Déborah Philippe & Damien Chaney & Ashlee Humphreys, 2021. "Maintaining legitimacy in contested mature markets through discursive strategies: the case of corporate environmentalism in the French automotive industry," Post-Print hal-02493108, HAL.
    22. Anastasia Thyroff & Jennifer Christie Siemens & Jeff B. Murray, 2018. "Constructing a theoretical framework for the process of innovation legitimation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 180-194, December.
    23. Hartman, Anna E. & Coslor, Erica, 2019. "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 405-419.
    24. Dengfeng Yan, 2016. "Numbers Are Gendered: The Role of Numerical Precision," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(2), pages 303-316.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:doi:10.1086/672358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.