IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v277y2021ics0277953621002446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sudbury-Riley, Lynn
  • Hunter-Jones, Philippa

Abstract

A paradigm shift toward healthcare inter-professional collaboration is leading to searches for ways to better facilitate integration. However, policy rhetoric often fails to acknowledge the complexity of healthcare service systems, and the difficulties involved in achieving successful collaborations. Consequently, more research is called for. We utilize the concept of a service ecosystem, a perspective currently prominent in service science, which is transforming the ways service systems are studied. This research aims to examine palliative care provision through a service ecosystem lens in order to uncover previously unidentified insights and opportunities for improvement. The palliative care ecosystem under study encompasses a defined geographical area of the UK. Data comprises pathographies (i.e., narratives of illness) with patients and their families (n = 31) and in-depth interviews with a variety of palliative care providers (n = 21), collected between 2017 and 2018. Capability issues comprising collaboration, coordination, and resource integration, together with communicating value all emerged as common themes impacting palliative care services. Taking a service ecosystem perspective, we also found shared intentionality for better integration and collaboration, with a desire among palliative care providers for the ecosystem's hospice organization to take the role of leader and facilitator. Acting on these findings, we demonstrate the ways new institutional arrangements provide a foundation for value cocreation. We make a contribution to the burgeoning service ecosystem literature which currently lacks empirical insights, particularly in health. We argue that in complex service systems such as healthcare, the focus must be on service design rather than organizational design, approached from the perspective of aggregation of service providers. We demonstrate empirically how reconfiguring resources and developing new institutional arrangements at the meso level can change micro-macro level interaction, enabling the emergence of new and enhanced value cocreation in palliative care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudbury-Riley, Lynn & Hunter-Jones, Philippa, 2021. "Facilitating inter-professional integration in palliative care: A service ecosystem perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:277:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621002446
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621002446
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    2. Storbacka, Kaj & Brodie, Roderick J. & Böhmann, Tilo & Maglio, Paul P. & Nenonen, Suvi, 2016. "Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3008-3017.
    3. Zaman, Shahaduz & Inbadas, Hamilton & Whitelaw, Alexander & Clark, David, 2017. "Common or multiple futures for end of life care around the world? Ideas from the ‘waiting room of history’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 72-79.
    4. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    5. McDougall, A. & Goldszmidt, M. & Kinsella, E.A. & Smith, S. & Lingard, L., 2016. "Collaboration and entanglement: An actor-network theory analysis of team-based intraprofessional care for patients with advanced heart failure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 108-117.
    6. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    7. Khosla, Nidhi & Marsteller, Jill Ann & Hsu, Yea Jen & Elliott, David L., 2016. "Analysing collaboration among HIV agencies through combining network theory and relational coordination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 85-94.
    8. Taillard, Marie & Peters, Linda D. & Pels, Jaqueline & Mele, Cristina, 2016. "The role of shared intentions in the emergence of service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2972-2980.
    9. Hulda G. Black & Andrew S. Gallan, 2015. "Transformative service networks: cocreated value as well-being," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(15-16), pages 826-845, November.
    10. Peters, Linda D., 2016. "Heteropathic versus homopathic resource integration and value co-creation in service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2999-3007.
    11. Vargo, Stephen L. & Maglio, Paul P. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru, 2008. "On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 145-152, June.
    12. Lusch, Robert F. & Vargo, Stephen L. & Gustafsson, Anders, 2016. "Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2957-2963.
    13. Koskela-Huotari, Kaisa & Edvardsson, Bo & Jonas, Julia M. & Sörhammar, David & Witell, Lars, 2016. "Innovation in service ecosystems—Breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2964-2971.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Whitelaw, Sandy & Bell, Anthony & Clark, David, 2022. "The expression of ‘policy’ in palliative care: A critical review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 889-898.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thompson-Whiteside, Helen & Fletcher-Brown, Judith & Middleton, Karen & Turnbull, Sarah, 2023. "Emergence in emergency: How actors adapt to service ecosystem disruption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Torres Pena, Maria Veronica & Breidbach, Christoph F., 2021. "On emergence in service platforms: An application to P2P lending," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 337-347.
    3. Polese, Francesco & Payne, Adrian & Frow, Pennie & Sarno, Debora & Nenonen, Suvi, 2021. "Emergence and phase transitions in service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 25-34.
    4. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Smyth, Hedley J., 2019. "Multiplex value cocreation in unique service exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 277-286.
    6. Schulz, Thomas & Zimmermann, Sina & Böhm, Markus & Gewald, Heiko & Krcmar, Helmut, 2021. "Value co-creation and co-destruction in service ecosystems: The case of the Reach Now app," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    7. Thomas Schulz & Markus Böhm & Heiko Gewald & Helmut Krcmar, 2021. "Smart mobility – an analysis of potential customers’ preference structures," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 105-124, March.
    8. Razmdoost, Kamran & Alinaghian, Leila & Chandler, Jennifer D. & Mele, Cristina, 2023. "Service ecosystem boundary and boundary work," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Viglia, Giampaolo & Pera, Rebecca & Dyussembayeva, Shynar & Mifsud, Matthieu & Hollebeek, Linda D., 2023. "Engagement and value cocreation within a multi-stakeholder service ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    10. Yar Hamidi, Daniel & Machold, Silke, 2020. "Governance, boards and value co-creation: Changing perspectives towards a service dominant logic," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 956-966.
    11. Lusch, Robert F. & Vargo, Stephen L. & Gustafsson, Anders, 2016. "Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2957-2963.
    12. Simmonds, Hamish & Gazley, Aaron & Kaartemo, Valtteri & Renton, Michelle & Hooper, Val, 2021. "Mechanisms of service ecosystem emergence: Exploring the case of public sector digital transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 100-115.
    13. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    14. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    15. van Tonder, Estelle & Saunders, Stephen Graham & Farquhar, Jillian Dawes, 2020. "Explicating the resource integration process during self-service socialisation: Conceptual framework and research propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 516-523.
    16. Hsin-Hui Chou & Chao-Chin Huang & Pei-Yun Tu, 2023. "Towards becoming a service-dominant enterprise: an actor engagement perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 607-632, June.
    17. Francesco Polese & Debora Sarno & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2018. "From B2B to A4A: An Integrated Framework for Viable Value Co-Creation," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 135-161.
    18. Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Mario R. Paredes & Michael Saren, 2019. "Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    19. Francesco Polese & Antonio Botti & Mara Grimaldi & Antonella Monda & Massimiliano Vesci, 2018. "Social Innovation in Smart Tourism Ecosystems: How Technology and Institutions Shape Sustainable Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Jens Poeppelbuss & Martin Ebel & Jürgen Anke, 2022. "Iterative uncertainty reduction in multi-actor smart service innovation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 599-627, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:277:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621002446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.