IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v23y2023i2d10.1007_s10660-021-09491-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study of cognitive effort involved in the framing effect of summary descriptions of online product reviews for search vs. experience products

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Jin

    (Shanghai International Studies University)

  • Chenchen Lin

    (Ningbo University)

  • Fenghua Wang

    (Shanghai International Studies University)

  • Ting Xu

    (Ningbo University)

  • Wuke Zhang

    (Ningbo University)

Abstract

Few studies have focused on summary descriptions of online product reviews regarding purchase decisions, and there is a gap between individual product reviews and summary descriptions of online product reviews. The current study applied eye-tracking to explore how the product type moderates the framing effect of summary descriptions of product reviews on e-consumers’ purchase decisions. The results showed that product type moderated the framing effect of summary reviews on e-consumers’ purchase intention. Specifically, for search products, compared with a negative frame, a positive frame increased e-consumers’ attention to function attributes and led to higher purchase intention. However, with experience products, e-consumers’ attention and purchase intention did not vary across framing messages. Referring to information asymmetry theory and signal theory, we posit that the cognitive effort involved in summary review information is high for search products and low for experience products since summary reviews are a more useful signal in reducing information asymmetry for search products than for experience products. The theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Jin & Chenchen Lin & Fenghua Wang & Ting Xu & Wuke Zhang, 2023. "A study of cognitive effort involved in the framing effect of summary descriptions of online product reviews for search vs. experience products," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 785-806, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09491-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-021-09491-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-021-09491-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-021-09491-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dina Mayzlin & Judith A. Chevalier, 2003. "The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm413, Yale School of Management.
    2. Nelson, Philip, 1974. "Advertising as Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(4), pages 729-754, July/Aug..
    3. Wagner Kamakura & Suman Basuroy & Peter Boatwright, 2006. "Is silence golden? An inquiry into the meaning of silence in professional product evaluations," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 119-141, June.
    4. Girard, Tulay & Dion, Paul, 2010. "Validating the search, experience, and credence product classification framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1079-1087, September.
    5. Levin, Irwin P & Gaeth, Gary J, 1988. "How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 374-378, December.
    6. Pan, Lee-Yun & Chiou, Jyh-Shen, 2011. "How Much Can You Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 67-74.
    7. Jeen-Su Lim & Abdulrahman Al-Aali & John Heinrichs, 2015. "Erratum to: Impact of satisfaction with e-retailers’ touch points on purchase behavior: the moderating effect of search and experience product type," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 727-727, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeen-Su Lim & Abdulrahman Al-Aali & John Heinrichs, 2015. "Impact of satisfaction with e-retailers’ touch points on purchase behavior: the moderating effect of search and experience product type," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 225-235, June.
    2. C F Elliott & R Simmons, 2007. "Determinants of UK box office success: the impact of quality signals," Working Papers 584026, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    3. Tibert Verhagen & Daniel Bloemers, 2018. "Exploring the cognitive and affective bases of online purchase intentions: a hierarchical test across product types," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 537-561, September.
    4. repec:lan:wpaper:1090 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jonah Berger & Michaela Draganska & Itamar Simonson, 2007. "The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 460-472, 07-08.
    6. Dokyun Lee & Kartik Hosanagar, 2021. "How Do Product Attributes and Reviews Moderate the Impact of Recommender Systems Through Purchase Stages?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 524-546, January.
    7. Zakaria Babutsidze, 2012. "If you love it I'll probably hate it : local interaction among consumers of information goods," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2012-24, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    8. Velasco, Franklin & Yang, Zhiyong & Janakiraman, Narayanan, 2021. "A meta-analytic investigation of consumer response to anthropomorphic appeals: The roles of product type and uncertainty avoidance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 735-746.
    9. Bartikowski, Boris & Laroche, Michel & Richard, Marie-Odile, 2019. "A content analysis of fear appeal advertising in Canada, China, and France," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 232-239.
    10. repec:lan:wpaper:1176 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Verma, Deepak & Prakash Dewani, Prem & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Dwivedi, Yogesh & Del Giudice, Manilo, 2023. "A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of eWOM credibility: Investigation of moderating role of culture and platform type," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. repec:lan:wpaper:1111 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Xiao, Lin & Li, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Yucheng, 2023. "Exploring the factors influencing consumer engagement behavior regarding short-form video advertising: A big data perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. repec:lan:wpaper:1089 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Pham, Thi Song Hanh & Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 332-342.
    16. Yu, Haihong & Liang, Yongchong & Wang, Ailian & Fan, Qi & Jin, Jia, 2022. "Pay online or pay on delivery? An ERP study of how payment methods affect online purchase decisions for search vs. experience products," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Caroline Elliott & Rob Simmons, 2008. "Determinants of UK Box Office Success: The Impact of Quality Signals," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 33(2), pages 93-111, September.
    18. Bartikowski, Boris & Berens, Guido, 2021. "Attribute framing in CSR communication: Doing good and spreading the word – But how?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 700-708.
    19. Liu, Huan & Lobschat, Lara & Verhoef, Peter C. & Zhao, Hong, 2019. "App Adoption: The Effect on Purchasing of Customers Who Have Used a Mobile Website Previously," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 16-34.
    20. Li, Kunlin & Chen, Yuhan & Zhang, Liyi, 2020. "Exploring the influence of online reviews and motivating factors on sales: A meta-analytic study and the moderating role of product category," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    21. Erik Ernesto Vazquez, 2021. "Effect of an e-retailer’s product category and social media platform selection on perceived quality of e-retail products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 139-157, March.
    22. Fouad El Ouardighi & Gustav Feichtinger & Dieter Grass & Richard F. Hartl & Peter M. Kort, 2016. "Advertising and Quality-Dependent Word-of-Mouth in a Contagion Sales Model," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(1), pages 323-342, July.
    23. Nima Jalali & Sangkil Moon & Moon-Yong Kim, 2023. "Profiling diverse reviewer segments using online reviews of service industries," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 130-148, June.
    24. Qingfeng Zeng & Qian Guo & Wei Zhuang & Yu Zhang & Weiguo Fan, 2023. "Do Real-Time Reviews Matter? Examining how Bullet Screen Influences Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Live Streaming Commerce," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 2051-2067, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:23:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10660-021-09491-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.