IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i3d10.1007_s10584-025-03885-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening local siting authority for utility-scale solar: effects on regulatory decisions and public opposition

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Hess

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Hayoung Seo

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Kaelee Belletto

    (Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

As governments have implemented climate mitigation policy, the construction of utility-scale renewable energy has led to increased opposition. Some governments have responded by preempting local authority over siting decisions, whereas others have opted to strengthen it. In the US, the state of Ohio is the leading example of the latter. Its enabling law for increased local authority is also part of a broader policy push by the conservative-controlled government to support continued use of fossil fuels. Based on the analysis of regulatory and media documents for 55 cases of proposed utility-scale solar farms in the state, the study examines the motivations and outcomes of the state’s local authority law. First, the study analyzes concerns expressed in local government resolutions since the state government implemented the law. Concerns with preserving the county’s rural character and with potential negative economic effects are the most salient, followed by specific site-related issues. Second, the study analyzes how the regulatory agency responded to the law by shifting its decision-making criteria to strengthen its consideration of local opposition. Third, the study quantifies the volume of opposition with two measures that show how the law increased opposition from local governments and the public. In summary, the law has been an effective instrument not only to undermine new utility-scale, renewable energy development but also to increase local opposition. Recommendations are developed for improving community acceptance of controversial siting proposals, no matter what decision a government makes on the preemption versus local siting authority issue.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Hess & Hayoung Seo & Kaelee Belletto, 2025. "Strengthening local siting authority for utility-scale solar: effects on regulatory decisions and public opposition," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03885-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03885-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03885-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03885-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua A. Basseches & Rebecca Bromley-Trujillo & Maxwell T. Boykoff & Trevor Culhane & Galen Hall & Noel Healy & David J. Hess & David Hsu & Rachel M. Krause & Harland Prechel & J. Timmons Roberts & J, 2022. "Climate policy conflict in the U.S. states: a critical review and way forward," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Cousse, Julia, 2021. "Still in love with solar energy? Installation size, affect, and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Leah C. Stokes, 2016. "Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy: A Natural Experiment on Retrospective Voting and Local Resistance to Public Policy," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 958-974, October.
    4. Susskind, Lawrence & Chun, Jungwoo & Gant, Alexander & Hodgkins, Chelsea & Cohen, Jessica & Lohmar, Sarah, 2022. "Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Faye Holder & Sanober Mirza & Namson-Ngo-Lee & Jake Carbone & Ruth E. McKie, 2023. "Climate obstruction and Facebook advertising: how a sample of climate obstruction organizations use social media to disseminate discourses of delay," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Robert J. Brulle & Galen Hall & Loredana Loy & Kennedy Schell-Smith, 2021. "Obstructing action: foundation funding and US climate change counter-movement organizations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-7, May.
    7. Robert Brulle & Christian Downie, 2022. "Following the money: trade associations, political activity and climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Anthony Lopez & Wesley Cole & Brian Sergi & Aaron Levine & Jesse Carey & Cailee Mangan & Trieu Mai & Travis Williams & Pavlo Pinchuk & Jianyu Gu, 2023. "Impact of siting ordinances on land availability for wind and solar development," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(9), pages 1034-1043, September.
    9. Maxwell Boykoff, 2024. "Climate change countermovements and adaptive strategies: insights from Heartland Institute annual conferences a decade apart," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Huang & Matthew E. Kahn, 2024. "Do Red States Have a Comparative Advantage in Generating Green Power?," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(1), pages 200-238.
    2. Grafström, Jonas, 2025. "Vertical industrial policy: principles, practice and potential," Ratio Working Papers 384, The Ratio Institute.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:y74uh_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Réka Juhász & Nathan Lane, 2024. "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 38(4), pages 27-54, Fall.
    5. Faye Holder & Sanober Mirza & Namson-Ngo-Lee & Jake Carbone & Ruth E. McKie, 2023. "Climate obstruction and Facebook advertising: how a sample of climate obstruction organizations use social media to disseminate discourses of delay," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Samuel Trachtman & Jonas Meckling, 2022. "The climate advocacy gap," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-7, June.
    7. Paul Lachapelle & Patrick Belmont & Marco Grasso & Roslynn McCann & Dawn H. Gouge & Jerri Husch & Cheryl Boer & Daniela Molzbichler & Sarah Klain, 2024. "Academic capture in the Anthropocene: a framework to assess climate action in higher education," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    9. Wilking, Jennifer & Madonia, Greg & Hansen, Peter, 2025. "Analysis of crime around a low-barrier, rotating homeless shelter," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Eurich, Marina, 2025. "Not in my postcode? Wind turbines and U.S. presidential approval," HWWI Working Paper Series 2/2025, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    11. Mitsch, Frieder & McNeil, Andrew, 2022. "Political implications of ‘green’ infrastructure in one’s ‘backyard’: the Green Party’s Catch 22?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115269, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. El Tinay, Hassan & Schor, Juliet B., 2025. "Do economists think about climate change and inequality? Semantic analysis and topic modeling of top five economics journals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    13. Steven Lloyd & Tetsuya Nakamura, 2022. "Public Perceptions of Renewable Energy in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz & Magdalena Zioło & Marek Dylewski, 2021. "Dynamic Analysis of the Similarity of Objects in Research on the Use of Renewable Energy Resources in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Jann Weinand & Tristan Pelser & Max Kleinebrahm & Detlef Stolten, 2024. "Countries across the world use more land for golf courses than wind or solar energy," Papers 2412.15376, arXiv.org.
    16. Italo Colantone & Livio Di Lonardo & Yotam Margalit & Marco Percoco, 2022. "The Political Consequences of Green Policies: Evidence from Italy," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 22176, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    17. Arndt, Christoph, 2023. "Climate change vs energy security? The conditional support for energy sources among Western Europeans," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    18. Eugene Y. Chan & Jack Lin, 2022. "Political ideology and psychological reactance: how serious should climate change be?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Apoorva Lal & Mac Lockhart & Yiqing Xu & Ziwen Zu, 2023. "How Much Should We Trust Instrumental Variable Estimates in Political Science? Practical Advice Based on Over 60 Replicated Studies," Papers 2303.11399, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    20. De Groote, Olivier & Gautier, Axel & Verboven, Frank, 2024. "The political economy of financing climate policy — Evidence from the solar PV subsidy programs," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    21. Dai, Tao & Scown, Corinne D., 2025. "A novel approach for large-scale wind energy potential assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03885-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.