IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v281y2019i1d10.1007_s10479-018-2792-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computation of the corrected Cornish–Fisher expansion using the response surface methodology: application to VaR and CVaR

Author

Listed:
  • Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme

    (Laval University)

  • Fabrice Barthélémy

    (Universite Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Didier Maillard

    (Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM); Amundi Asset Management)

Abstract

The Cornish–Fisher expansion is a simple way to determine quantiles of non-normal distributions. It is frequently used by practitioners and by academics in risk management, portfolio allocation, and asset liability management. It allows us to consider non-normality and, thus, moments higher than the second moment, using a formula in which terms in higher-order moments appear explicitly. This paper has two primary objectives. First, we resolve the classic confusion between the skewness and kurtosis coefficients of the formula and the actual skewness and kurtosis of the distribution when using the Cornish–Fisher expansion. Second, we use the response surface approach to estimate a function for these two values. This helps to overcome the difficulties associated with using the Cornish–Fisher expansion correctly to compute value at risk. In particular, it allows a direct computation of the quantiles. Our methodology has many practical applications in risk management and asset allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy & Didier Maillard, 2019. "Computation of the corrected Cornish–Fisher expansion using the response surface methodology: application to VaR and CVaR," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 281(1), pages 423-453, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:281:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2792-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-018-2792-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-018-2792-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-018-2792-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. S. Isukapalli & A. Roy & P. G. Georgopoulos, 2000. "Efficient Sensitivity/Uncertainty Analysis Using the Combined Stochastic Response Surface Method and Automated Differentiation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 591-602, October.
    2. W. Sauerbrei & P. Royston, 1999. "Building multivariable prognostic and diagnostic models: transformation of the predictors by using fractional polynomials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 162(1), pages 71-94.
    3. Neddermeijer, H.G. & van Oortmarssen, G.J. & Piersma, N. & Dekker, R., 2000. "A framework for response surface methodology for simulation optimization," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2000-14/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. Sofiane Aboura & Didier Maillard, 2016. "Option Pricing Under Skewness and Kurtosis Using a Cornish–Fisher Expansion," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(12), pages 1194-1209, December.
    5. V. Chernozhukov & I. Fernández-Val & A. Galichon, 2009. "Improving point and interval estimators of monotone functions by rearrangement," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 559-575.
    6. Patrick Royston & Douglas G. Altman, 1994. "Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric Modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 43(3), pages 429-453, September.
    7. Sofiane Aboura & Didier Maillard, 2016. "Option Pricing Under Skewness and Kurtosis Using a Cornish-Fisher Expansion," Post-Print halshs-01348685, HAL.
    8. Carlo Acerbi & Dirk Tasche, 2002. "Expected Shortfall: A Natural Coherent Alternative to Value at Risk," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 31(2), pages 379-388, July.
    9. James G. MacKinnon, 2010. "Critical Values For Cointegration Tests," Working Paper 1227, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    10. Jaschke, Stefan R., 2001. "The Cornish-Fisher-Expansion in the context of Delta - Gamma - Normal approximations," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2001,54, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    11. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val & Alfred Galichon, 2010. "Rearranging Edgeworth–Cornish–Fisher expansions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(2), pages 419-435, February.
    12. N. Naguez & J. L. Prigent, 2017. "Optimal portfolio positioning within generalized Johnson distributions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 1037-1055, July.
    13. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy & Donald Keenan, 2015. "Cornish-Fisher Expansion for Commercial Real Estate Value at Risk," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 439-464, May.
    14. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    15. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    16. Robert F. Engle & Simone Manganelli, 2004. "CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantiles," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 22, pages 367-381, October.
    17. Tae-Hwy Lee & Yong Bao & Burak Saltoglu, 2006. "Evaluating predictive performance of value-at-risk models in emerging markets: a reality check," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 101-128.
    18. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    19. Matthew Pritsker, 1997. "Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 12(2), pages 201-242, October.
    20. He, Zhen & Zhu, Peng-Fei & Park, Sung-Hyun, 2012. "A robust desirability function method for multi-response surface optimization considering model uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 241-247.
    21. Philip Yu & Wai Keung Li & Shusong Jin, 2010. "On Some Models for Value-At-Risk," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5-6), pages 622-641.
    22. Longin, Francois M., 2000. "From value at risk to stress testing: The extreme value approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1097-1130, July.
    23. Patrick Royston & Gareth Ambler, 1999. "Multivariable fractional polynomials," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(43).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theo Berger & Christina Uffmann, 2021. "Assessing liquidity‐adjusted risk forecasts," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 1179-1189, November.
    2. Bavaud, François, 2023. "Exact first moments of the RV coefficient by invariant orthogonal integration," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. León, Ángel & Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel, 2021. "The transformed Gram Charlier distribution: Parametric properties and financial risk applications," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 323-349.
    4. Lehlohonolo Letho & Grieve Chelwa & Abdul Latif Alhassan, 2022. "Cryptocurrencies and portfolio diversification in an emerging market," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 20-50, January.
    5. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2022. "Proper use of the modified Sharpe ratios in performance measurement: rearranging the Cornish Fisher expansion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 691-712, June.
    6. Mikhail Stolbov & Maria Shchepeleva, 2021. "Macrofinancial linkages in Europe: Evidence from quantile local projections," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5557-5569, October.
    7. Zhang, Ning & Su, Xiaoman & Qi, Shuyuan, 2023. "An empirical investigation of multiperiod tail risk forecasting models," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2022. "Proper use of the modified Sharpe ratios in performance measurement: rearranging the Cornish Fisher expansion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 691-712, June.
    2. Nieto, Maria Rosa & Ruiz, Esther, 2016. "Frontiers in VaR forecasting and backtesting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 475-501.
    3. Luigi Aldieri & Alessandra Amendola & Vincenzo Candila, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Marco Rocco, 2011. "Extreme value theory for finance: a survey," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 99, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    6. Alexis Bonnet & Isabelle Nagot, 2005. "Methodology of measuring performance in alternative investment," Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques b05078, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).
    7. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy, 2018. "Ex-ante real estate Value at Risk calculation method," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 262(2), pages 257-285, March.
    8. So Yeon Chun & Alexander Shapiro & Stan Uryasev, 2012. "Conditional Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk: Estimation and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 739-756, August.
    9. Pritsker, Matthew, 2006. "The hidden dangers of historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 561-582, February.
    10. Lisa R. Goldberg & Ola Mahmoud, 2014. "Drawdown: From Practice to Theory and Back Again," Papers 1404.7493, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    11. Nieto, María Rosa, 2008. "Measuring financial risk : comparison of alternative procedures to estimate VaR and ES," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws087326, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    12. Alexis Bonnet & Isabelle Nagot, 2005. "Methodology of measuring performance in alternative investment," Post-Print halshs-00196443, HAL.
    13. Charles-Olivier Amédée-Manesme & Fabrice Barthélémy & Donald Keenan, 2015. "Cornish-Fisher Expansion for Commercial Real Estate Value at Risk," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 439-464, May.
    14. Huang, Jinbo & Ding, Ashley & Li, Yong & Lu, Dong, 2020. "Increasing the risk management effectiveness from higher accuracy: A novel non-parametric method," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    16. Yuzhi Cai, 2021. "Estimating expected shortfall using a quantile function model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4332-4360, July.
    17. Brenda Castillo-Brais & Ángel León & Juan Mora, 2022. "Estimating Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall: Do Polynomial Expansions Outperform Parametric Densities?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Giannopoulos, Kostas & Tunaru, Radu, 2005. "Coherent risk measures under filtered historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 979-996, April.
    19. Brandtner, Mario, 2013. "Conditional Value-at-Risk, spectral risk measures and (non-)diversification in portfolio selection problems – A comparison with mean–variance analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5526-5537.
    20. Winter, Peter, 2007. "Managerial Risk Accounting and Control – A German perspective," MPRA Paper 8185, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cornish–Fisher expansion; Response surface methodology; Quantiles; Value at Risk; Expected shortfall;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C46 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Specific Distributions
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:281:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-018-2792-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.